Skip to content

chore(deps-dev): bump turbo from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14#9195

Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/turbo-2.9.14
Open

chore(deps-dev): bump turbo from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14#9195
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/turbo-2.9.14

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github May 20, 2026

Bumps turbo from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14.

Release notes

Sourced from turbo's releases.

Turborepo v2.9.14

[!NOTE] This release contains important security fixes.

High:

Low:

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.12...v2.9.14

Turborepo v2.9.13-canary.1

What's Changed

Changelog

... (truncated)

Commits
Maintainer changes

This version was pushed to npm by GitHub Actions, a new releaser for turbo since your current version.


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

@dependabot
chore(deps-dev): bump turbo from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14
f3f3cee 
Bumps [turbo](https://github.com/vercel/turborepo) from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/vercel/turborepo/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/vercel/turborepo/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](vercel/turborepo@v2.3.0...v2.9.14)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: turbo
  dependency-version: 2.9.14
  dependency-type: direct:development
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update javascript code labels May 20, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 20, 2026 11:47
Copilot AI reviewed May 20, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

✅ PR Title

  • Current: chore(deps-dev): bump turbo from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14
  • Issue: Title is concise and follows conventional commit style. No major issue.
  • Recommendation: Optionally append reason/impact for clarity (e.g. chore(deps-dev): bump turbo from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14 (security fixes)), since the release contains security fixes — that helps reviewers prioritize.

❌ Commit Type

  • None selected in the provided PR body/template.
  • Commit Type Assessment: The PR body does not include the PR template selection for Commit Type. For a dependency bump, the correct commit type from the template is chore (or deps if you use that convention). Only one option should be selected.
  • Commit Type Note: Please select exactly one checkbox in the Commit Type section of the template (recommended: chore).

❌ Risk Level

  • Risk Level Assessment: Missing. The PR does not include the required Risk Level selection (Low/Medium/High) in the template and the repository labels do not include a risk:* label.
  • Recommendation: Based on the code diff (only package.json and pnpm-lock.yaml updates for a tooling dependency — turborepo 2.3.0 -> 2.9.14 — and lockfile updates that include platform-specific turbo packages and a few dependency bumps), I advise Medium risk. Rationale:
    • This is a tooling/monorepo build system upgrade (turborepo). Such upgrades can affect CI, caching, and build behavior across the repo.
    • The release notes mention security fixes; that increases urgency but does not necessarily change scope to High.
    • No source code logic changed, but build behavior/regeneration of lockfiles could have repo-wide effects.
  • Action: Please update the Risk Level checkbox in the PR body to Medium and add a corresponding label risk:medium to the PR.

❌ What & Why

  • Current: Bumps [turbo](https://github.com/vercel/turborepo) from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14. (Dependabot release notes are included in the body)
  • Issue: The PR body does not follow the required template sections. While the dependabot body includes release notes, the template expects a concise "What does this change" and "Why" section. The required short summary is not present in the template format.
  • Recommendation: Add a short clear "What & Why" section (2-3 sentences). Example to paste into the template's What & Why:
    • "What: Upgrade turborepo (dev tooling) from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14."
    • "Why: Includes important security fixes and bugfixes (see release notes). Upgrading helps avoid known vulnerabilities and keeps build tooling up to date."

❌ Impact of Change

  • Issue: The template's Impact of Change section is not filled. The PR body should explicitly state who/what is affected.
  • Recommendation:
    • Users: None - there are no user-facing application code changes. If your project publishes a CLI or otherwise exposes turbo outputs, mention any user-facing effects.
    • Developers: All contributors — local and CI builds may behave differently; suggest running a full bootstrap and a full CI run locally if possible.
    • System: CI caches and turbo remote caching behavior might change. Recommend clearing/rescoping caches if CI failures occur after upgrade.
  • Suggested text to add to the template's Impact of Change:
    • "Users: No runtime/user-facing changes expected."
    • "Developers: Build and dev commands may behave differently; run local builds and check CI."
    • "System: CI caching and turborepo remote caching may need validation; ensure pipelines are green and adjust cache keys if needed."

❌ Test Plan

  • Test Plan Assessment: No unit tests, E2E tests, or Manual testing checkbox are checked in the provided PR body. There is no explanation for why tests are not present.
  • Issue: For dependency/tooling upgrades (especially those that affect the build system), the PR must either add/adjust tests if required or provide a clear test plan explaining how the upgrade was validated. Because there are no tests or test plan provided, this check fails.
  • Recommendation: Provide at minimum a brief test plan and CI verification steps. Example checklist to add to the Test Plan section:
    • Run full CI (all pipelines) and ensure green
    • Locally: pnpm install && pnpm -w build && pnpm -w test (or equivalent project commands)
    • If you rely on remote caching: validate that remote caching is working in CI and cache keys remain valid
    • If you cannot add tests because this is only a lockfile bump, explicitly explain why and include CI green-check evidence.

Note: The repo contains only package.json/pnpm-lock changes. Even so, for a turborepo upgrade we expect a CI run and confirmation in the Test Plan that CI completed successfully.

⚠️ Contributors

  • Contributors Assessment: Empty. Not required but recommended to credit Dependabot and any reviewers who helped.
  • Recommendation: Add Contributors line: - dependabot[bot] (automated upgrade) and any internal reviewers if applicable.

✅ Screenshots/Videos

  • Screenshots Assessment: Not applicable (no UI changes). This is fine.

Summary Table

Section Status Recommendation
Title ✅ Title is good; consider adding (security fixes) for visibility
Commit Type ❌ Select one: chore (recommended for dependency bumps)
Risk Level ❌ Add Medium in template and label risk:medium
What & Why ❌ Add 2–3 sentence "What & Why" per template (include security CVEs)
Impact of Change ❌ Fill Users/Developers/System impacts per template
Test Plan ❌ Provide CI verification and local test commands; run full CI and mark checkboxes
Contributors ⚠️ Optional: add Dependabot and any reviewers/authors
Screenshots/Videos ✅ Not applicable for this PR

Final Message
This PR does not pass because the PR body does not follow the required template: Commit Type and Risk Level are missing, Impact and Test Plan are not filled, and there is no explicit CI/test validation provided. The code diff is limited to package.json and pnpm-lock.yaml changes for a turborepo upgrade (2.3.0 -> 2.9.14) — I recommend labeling this as risk:medium and updating the PR body accordingly.

What you should do to get this PR to pass the PR-body check:

  1. Update the PR body to use the required template and check exactly one Commit Type box (recommended: chore).
  2. Set Risk Level to Medium in the template and add a risk:medium label to the PR.
  3. Fill the "What & Why" section with a short summary (example below):
    • "What: Upgrade turborepo (dev tooling) from 2.3.0 to 2.9.14.\n - Why: Includes several security fixes (see release notes) and bug fixes; keeps tooling current."
  4. Fill the "Impact of Change" section with the three bullets (Users/Developers/System) provided above.
  5. Provide a Test Plan: at minimum confirm that the repository's CI passed with this bump and add steps you ran locally (commands). Example:
    • pnpm install (or your workspace install command)
    • pnpm -w build and pnpm -w test (or repo-specific equivalents)
    • Confirm CI pipelines are green and paste links or CI run snippet in the PR body.
  6. Add Contributors entry acknowledging dependabot[bot].

Once those changes are made and CI is green, re-request review. If you disagree with the advised risk level and believe it should be Low, include an explanation and evidence (passing full CI, no change to optionalDependencies that affect runtime, and a short compatibility checklist) and I will re-evaluate.

Thank you for keeping dependencies up to date — the release contains important security fixes and it's good to upgrade. Please update the PR body as requested and re-submit.

Last updated: Wed, 20 May 2026 11:51:13 GMT

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 20, 2026

📊 Coverage Check

No source files changed in this PR.

@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 22, 2026
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update javascript code needs-pr-update

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant