From c05a6c2a472b526d9d6c1240aefbc64b8bd7dc0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Sauge <71391932+rya-sge@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:31:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Update readme

---
 README.md | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 9932ed7..186cca7 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ All deployable contracts share the same core functionality (`RuleEngineBase`, di
 
 > **Warning (shared engine across multiple tokens):** A "multi-tenant" setup here means one RuleEngine instance is shared by several token contracts (all bound through `bindToken`). In this setup, tokens must be equally trusted and governed together. ERC-3643 callbacks (`transferred`, `created`, `destroyed`) do not pass the token address to rules, so stateful/accounting rules are not safe for mutually untrusted tokens sharing the same engine.
 
-[TOC]
-
 ## Motivation
 
 - Why use a dedicated contract with rules instead of implementing it directly in CMTAT or [ERC-3643](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3643) tokens?