Skip to content

Commit 8f97924

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #120 from Catrobat/AIOTSonline-patch-2
Expand project details for GSoC 2026 proposals
2 parents 23fe3d0 + 2a6d7fe commit 8f97924

1 file changed

Lines changed: 146 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

  • pages/development/google-summer-of-code

pages/development/google-summer-of-code/2026.md

Lines changed: 146 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -286,6 +286,152 @@ Expected Outcome
286286

287287
<hr>
288288

289+
### Blockchain-Based Ethical Governance for IoT Care Systems
290+
291+
350 Hours
292+
{: .label .label-blue }
293+
294+
{: .highlight }
295+
> **Required Skills**: Strong programming fundamentals, smart contract development, blockchain architecture understanding, API design and system integration, security and access-control concepts
296+
> **Possible Mentors**: Garima Jain, Supreeth Kumar M
297+
> **Desirable Skills**: Privacy-by-design principles, cryptographic hashing, regulatory-aware system design
298+
> **Expected Outcome**: A complete blockchain-based consent and governance framework for IoT care systems
299+
> **Difficulty level**: Advanced
300+
> **Project Size**: Large
301+
302+
Description
303+
304+
This project focuses on designing and implementing a blockchain-based governance and consent framework for ethical IoT-based care monitoring systems. The objective is to ensure trust, transparency, data ownership, and immutable consent management for sensitive care-related data generated by IoT devices used in assisted living environments.
305+
306+
Rather than storing health data on-chain, the blockchain will act as a trust and audit layer, recording consent decisions, access approvals, role assignments, and accountability events.
307+
308+
Problem Context
309+
310+
IoT-based care systems face critical challenges:
311+
312+
- Consent is often implicit, unclear, or changeable without traceability
313+
- Care data access decisions are difficult to audit
314+
- Families, caregivers, and supervisors rely on centralized systems with limited transparency
315+
- Ethical compliance relies heavily on documentation rather than system-level enforcement
316+
317+
This project addresses these issues by embedding ethical governance directly into system architecture using blockchain.
318+
319+
Technical Scope
320+
321+
**A. Governance Model Design**
322+
- Definition of care-related roles (patient, caregiver, supervisor, relative)
323+
- Consent lifecycle modeling (grant, update, revoke)
324+
- Human-in-the-loop approval workflows
325+
326+
**B. Blockchain Layer**
327+
- Smart contracts for:
328+
- Consent registration and revocation
329+
- Role-based access authorization
330+
- Event logging for care-related decisions
331+
- Immutable audit trail for:
332+
- Who approved what
333+
- When access was granted or revoked
334+
- Which role initiated the action
335+
336+
**C. Off-Chain / On-Chain Architecture**
337+
- Sensitive IoT data stored off-chain
338+
- Cryptographic hashes and metadata stored on-chain
339+
- Blockchain used purely for verification, not data storage
340+
341+
**D. Integration Interface**
342+
- APIs to connect IoT systems with the blockchain layer
343+
- Verification endpoints for access checks
344+
- Read-only audit views for compliance and evaluation
345+
346+
Expected Outcome
347+
348+
At the end of the project, the contributor will deliver:
349+
350+
- A complete blockchain-based consent and governance framework
351+
- Deployed smart contracts implementing ethical access control
352+
- API layer enabling IoT system integration
353+
- Demonstrable immutable audit trail
354+
- System architecture documentation and threat analysis
355+
356+
The result is a production-relevant governance layer, not a theoretical blockchain demo.
357+
358+
<hr>
359+
360+
### Gemini-API–Powered Intelligent Care Assistant
361+
362+
350 Hours
363+
{: .label .label-blue }
364+
365+
{: .highlight }
366+
> **Required Skills**: Backend development, API integration, prompt engineering for structured systems, data processing and normalization, system-level reasoning
367+
> **Desirable Skills**: Human-centered AI design, ethical AI concepts, evaluation of AI outputs
368+
> **Possible Mentors**: Supreeth Kumar M, Atharva Prashant Joshi
369+
> **Expected Outcome**: An AI-powered, ethically governed intelligent care assistant built on Gemini API
370+
> **Difficulty level**: Intermediate to Advanced
371+
> **Project Size**: Large
372+
373+
Description
374+
375+
This project aims to build an AI-powered intelligent care assistant using the Gemini API to support caregivers, supervisors, and families by converting raw IoT activity signals into context-aware insights, summaries, and alerts—while maintaining ethical, permission-based access. The focus is on responsible AI usage, ensuring that AI augments human decision-making rather than replacing it.
376+
377+
The assistant acts as an interpretation and explanation layer over existing IoT-based care systems, not as a surveillance or diagnostic system.
378+
379+
Problem Context
380+
381+
IoT care systems generate large volumes of low-level signals such as:
382+
383+
- Activity logs
384+
- Time-based events
385+
- Movement patterns
386+
- Routine confirmations
387+
388+
These signals are difficult to interpret meaningfully and ethically in real time. Manual monitoring often leads to caregiver overload, missed anomalies, and increased anxiety among family members. This project introduces an AI interpretation layer that summarizes and contextualizes data while preserving human oversight.
389+
390+
Technical Scope
391+
392+
**A. Data Interpretation Layer**
393+
- Structured ingestion of non-invasive IoT activity data
394+
- Time-windowed summaries of daily routines
395+
- Detection of deviations from normal patterns
396+
397+
**B. Gemini API Integration**
398+
- Natural-language summaries of patient routines
399+
- Context-aware explanations for alerts (why an alert was triggered)
400+
- Ethical prompt design to avoid medical diagnosis or inference
401+
- Role-aware output filtering (different outputs for caregivers, supervisors, and relatives)
402+
403+
**C. Human-in-the-Loop Controls**
404+
- AI outputs require supervisor validation before escalation
405+
- Confidence indicators and uncertainty explanations
406+
- Manual override and feedback loop for continuous improvement
407+
408+
**D. Responsible AI Safeguards**
409+
- Prompt constraints and system instructions
410+
- No medical diagnosis generation
411+
- Explainability-first responses
412+
- Logging and review of AI outputs
413+
414+
**E. Application & System Integration**
415+
- Integration with a secure care monitoring application featuring role-restricted dashboards
416+
- Support for voice-assisted interactions to improve accessibility for elderly users
417+
- Backend services handling ingestion, summarization, and alert generation
418+
- Secure authentication and role-based access to AI-generated insights
419+
420+
Expected Outcome
421+
422+
By the end of the project, the contributor will deliver:
423+
424+
- An AI-powered intelligent care assistant service
425+
- Gemini API–based summarization and explanation engine
426+
- Ethical prompt and output governance framework
427+
- Role-based AI response filtering
428+
- Demonstration of AI-assisted, human-approved alerts
429+
- Complete documentation and evaluation report
430+
431+
The outcome demonstrates applied, responsible AI in a real-world care context, not chatbot experimentation.
432+
433+
<hr>
434+
289435
### AR Rocket Builder & Space Flight Sandbox
290436

291437
350 Hours

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)