Skip to content

Consider adding actual code of spec example somewhere in Readme #1022

@matkoniecz

Description

@matkoniecz

https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/#see-it-in-action has "See it in action" but actual spec powering this example are not seen anywhere

personally I am curious whether it is better than my current approach (presumably less structure instructions in markdown file(s)) - so I am curious how OpenSpec persistent prompt/specs/however you call it actually look like

maybe link specs of openspec if you use it on this repo?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions