diff --git a/_posts/2026-02-12-fcs-iimoc-collab.md b/_posts/2026-02-12-fcs-iimoc-collab.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..acd7545
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_posts/2026-02-12-fcs-iimoc-collab.md
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+---
+layout: distill
+title: "Frontier-CS × IIMOC Collaboration"
+description: "Frontier-CS and the International Invitational Math Optimization Challenge (IIMOC) announce a formal collaboration to study open-ended algorithmic problem solving, solution diversity, and long-horizon improvement across humans and AI systems."
+
+date: 2026-02-12
+date_display: "Feb 12, 2026"
+htmlwidgets: true
+toc: true
+
+authors:
+  - name: "Edwin Chen"
+    url: "https://github.com/echen5503"
+    affiliations:
+      name: "Independent"
+  - name: "Alvin Cheung"
+    url: "https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~akcheung/"
+    affiliations:
+      name: "UC Berkeley"
+      url: "https://www.berkeley.edu/"
+  - name: Qiuyang Mang
+    url: "https://joyemang33.github.io"
+    affiliations:
+      name: UC Berkeley
+  - name: Hanchen Li
+    url: "https://hanchenli.github.io/"
+    affiliations:
+      name: UC Berkeley
+  - name: "Frontier-CS Team"
+    url: "https://frontier-cs.org"
+  - name: "IIMOC Team"
+    url: "https://iimoc.org"
+
+_styles: >
+  d-article img {
+    max-width: 100%;
+    height: auto;
+    display: block;
+    margin: 1.5rem auto;
+    border-radius: 6px;
+  }
+  d-article p img {
+    display: block;
+    margin-left: auto;
+    margin-right: auto;
+  }
+---
+![](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FrontierCS/Frontier-CS/main/assets/logo.png)
+
+We are pleased to announce a formal collaboration between **[Frontier-CS](https://github.com/FrontierCS/Frontier-CS)** and the **[International Invitational Math Optimization Challenge (IIMOC)](https://iimoc.org)**.
+
+Frontier-CS is an open research benchmark designed to evaluate high-difficulty algorithmic and optimization problems on a **continuous 0–100 scale**, rather than through binary correctness. This distinction is central: many meaningful optimization tasks do not admit a single canonical “correct” answer, but instead reward incremental refinement, structural insight, and strategic iteration.
+
+By contrast to classical contest-style problems that collapse to a single solution, Frontier-CS emphasizes problems where progress is measurable and multi-directional. Improvements can be partial, iterative, and comparative — allowing performance to be modeled as a trajectory rather than a point outcome.
+
+---
+
+## Why This Collaboration Matters
+
+Open-ended benchmarks are strongest when evaluated across diverse environments. Competitive settings introduce dynamics that static benchmarks cannot capture: time constraints, adversarial iteration, exploration under uncertainty, and heterogeneous strategy formation.
+
+The International Invitational Math Optimization Challenge (IIMOC) provides a large-scale, human-driven optimization setting that naturally complements model-based evaluation. Integrating Frontier-CS problems into IIMOC allows us to observe how humans:
+
+* allocate effort under time pressure
+* balance exploration versus exploitation
+* iterate across many submissions
+* converge (or fail to converge) toward high-performing strategies
+
+This pairing enables a rare alignment between controlled research benchmarking and real competitive dynamics.
+
+---
+
+## The 2025 Pilot Run
+
+In 2025, a pilot integration of Frontier-CS problems into IIMOC attracted:
+
+* **209 teams**
+* **9,549 total submissions**
+
+Rather than rapidly converging to a dominant solution, teams exhibited sustained improvement behavior over time. Multiple solution paradigms emerged, with distinct structural trade-offs and performance characteristics.
+
+Empirically, the pilot demonstrated that Frontier-CS problems:
+
+* support long-horizon improvement rather than short-term exploitation
+* admit multiple competitive approaches
+* resist collapse to a single dominant heuristic
+* produce measurable improvement curves across repeated submissions
+
+This evidence strengthens Frontier-CS as a benchmark for studying *optimization dynamics*, rather than static correctness or one-shot performance.
+
+---
+
+## Research Directions Enabled by the Collaboration
+
+Building on the pilot, Frontier-CS and IIMOC are formalizing this partnership as an evaluation and data-collection framework.
+
+The collaboration enables systematic study of:
+
+* **Solution multiplicity** in open-ended algorithmic search
+* **Human improvement curves** under iterative submission models
+* **Comparative improvement dynamics** between humans and AI systems
+* **Strategy diversity and convergence behavior** over time
+
+Because performance is scored on a continuous scale, we can model:
+
+* fine-grained optimization trajectories
+* plateau and breakthrough phenomena
+* exploration–exploitation trade-offs
+* variance across teams and across problem classes
+
+This transforms competitive programming from a binary success metric into a longitudinal study of adaptive search.
+
+---
+
+## Toward a Long-Term Pipeline
+
+Frontier-CS will continue expanding its library of high-difficulty algorithmic tasks. Select problems may be incorporated into future IIMOC competitions, forming a sustained pipeline between:
+
+* an **open research benchmark infrastructure**, and
+* a **competitive, time-bounded evaluation ecosystem**
+
+This structure supports:
+
+* controlled experimentation
+* large-scale human behavioral data
+* cross-comparison with frontier AI systems
+* longitudinal benchmarking across benchmark releases
+
+By integrating open benchmarking with competitive optimization dynamics, Frontier-CS × IIMOC aims to advance the study of measurable progress in algorithmic discovery — across both human and machine systems.
+
+We look forward to deepening this collaboration and continuing to develop Frontier-CS as a benchmark that meaningfully captures evolving intelligence across domains.
+