+LPA results identified two dominant science and math anxiety profiles that accounted for most of the sample: Low Science and Math Anxiety (59.3%) and High Math Anxiety (21.9%) (Fig 3). Less common profiles, High Science and Math Anxiety (6.5%) and High Science Anxiety (4.1%), were not analyzed in this study. No significant differences between High Math Anxiety' and Low Science and Math Anxiety groups regarding age, sex, ethnicity, income, GPA, FIU enrollment years, general anxiety, FCI/PK tasks accuracy, and Phase II/III FCI task reaction times. However, High Math Anxiety group spent significantly more time on Phase I (Scenario) of the FCI task. In the FCI task, we observed significant variations in between-network connectivity. Specifically, High Math Anxiety participants showed reduced connectivity (DAN-VAN, DAN-DMN, VAN-DMN) exclusively in Phase III (Answer) compared to Low Science and Math Anxiety students. Notably, Phases I (Scenario) and II (Question) revealed no substantial connectivity difference. All phases were unaffected by covariates. During the PK task, High Math Anxiety participants presented significantly reduced DAN-VAN between-network connectivity compared to their Low Science and Math Anxiety counterparts. Covariates did not significantly influence connectivity. The FCI task showed significant alterations in within-network connectivity. High Math Anxiety participants had reduced connectivity (DAN, VAN, DMN) within networks only in Phase III (Answer) compared to Low Science and Math Anxiety participants. No significant difference was noted in within-network connectivity during Phase I (Scenario) and II (Question). Covariates had no impact across all phases. During the PK task, we found significant differences in within-network connectivity. Specifically, High Math Anxiety participants demonstrated a decrease in DAN within-network connectivity compared to Low Science and Math Anxiety participants. No covariate influence on connectivity variation was noted.
0 commit comments