|
| 1 | +import marimo |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +__generated_with = "0.19.11" |
| 4 | +app = marimo.App(width="medium") |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +@app.cell |
| 8 | +def _(): |
| 9 | + import marimo as mo |
| 10 | + import matplotlib.pyplot as plt |
| 11 | + import numpy as np |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + return mo, np, plt |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 17 | +def _(mo): |
| 18 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 19 | + # Location-specific Contact Patterns and NPIs |
| 20 | +
|
| 21 | + ## Introduction |
| 22 | +
|
| 23 | + In Tutorial 3, we applied contact reductions (`Dampings`) uniformly to a single contact matrix. In reality, contacts between individuals occur in different locations: **at home**, **at school**, **at work**, and in **other** places such as transport. Different non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) target different settings, for instance a school closure reduces school contacts, while a home-office mandate mainly reduces work contacts. |
| 24 | +
|
| 25 | + Large-scale studies, such as the POLYMOD project, have measured social contact patterns across different locations (like home, school, work, and others) in various countries. For instance, see |
| 26 | +
|
| 27 | + * **Mossong2008**: Mossong J, Hens N, Jit M, Beutels P, Auranen K, et al. (2008) *Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases*. PLoS Med 5(3): e74. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074 |
| 28 | + * **Prem2017**: Prem K, Cook AR, Jit M (2017) *Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic data*. PLoS Comput Biol 13(9): e1005697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005697 |
| 29 | +
|
| 30 | + In this tutorial, we extend the approach from Tutorial 3 by splitting the contact matrix into **location-specific contact matrices** using `ContactMatrixGroup`. This allows us to apply NPIs to individual locations, allowing a more realistic and detailed representation of intervention effects. |
| 31 | + """) |
| 32 | + return |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 36 | +def _(mo): |
| 37 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 38 | + ## Model Setup |
| 39 | +
|
| 40 | + We first import the needed functions from the memilio-simulation package: |
| 41 | + """) |
| 42 | + return |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +@app.cell |
| 46 | +def _(): |
| 47 | + import memilio.simulation as mio |
| 48 | + import memilio.simulation.osecir as osecir |
| 49 | + from memilio.simulation import AgeGroup, Damping, LogLevel, set_log_level |
| 50 | + set_log_level(LogLevel.Off) |
| 51 | + return AgeGroup, Damping, mio, osecir |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 55 | +def _(mo): |
| 56 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 57 | + We define four contact locations and use an `IntEnum` to refer to them. We also set the basic simulation parameters - population size, time horizon, and step size - as in Tutorial 3: |
| 58 | + """) |
| 59 | + return |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +@app.cell |
| 63 | +def _(): |
| 64 | + from enum import IntEnum |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + class Location(IntEnum): |
| 67 | + Home = 0 |
| 68 | + School = 1 |
| 69 | + Work = 2 |
| 70 | + Other = 3 |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + total_population = 100000 |
| 73 | + t0 = 0 |
| 74 | + tmax = 100 |
| 75 | + dt = 0.1 |
| 76 | + return Location, dt, t0, tmax, total_population |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 80 | +def _(mo): |
| 81 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 82 | + ## Location-specific Contact Matrices |
| 83 | +
|
| 84 | + Instead of a single contact matrix, we now use a `ContactMatrixGroup`, containing one `ContactMatrix` per location. Each `ContactMatrix` has two components: |
| 85 | +
|
| 86 | + - **Baseline**: the typical number of daily contacts at the location under regular conditions. |
| 87 | + - **Minimum**: the minimal contact rate even under the strictest restrictions, as some contacts, especially at home, cannot be fully avoided. |
| 88 | +
|
| 89 | + The effective contact rate at simulation time $t$ for a location $\ell$ is: |
| 90 | +
|
| 91 | + $$C_\ell(t) = C_{\ell,\text{baseline}} - D_\ell(t) \cdot \left(C_{\ell,\text{baseline}} - C_{\ell,\text{minimum}}\right)$$ |
| 92 | +
|
| 93 | + where $D_\ell(t) \leq 1$ is the damping coefficient. For $D > 0$ contacts are reduced; for $D = 1$ they reach the minimum; and for $D < 0$ contacts are **increased above the baseline**. The upper bound $D \leq 1$ is enforced by MEmilio's C++ core. The ODE model uses the **sum** of all location-specific matrices as the total contact rate. |
| 94 | +
|
| 95 | + The total baseline contact rate (sum over all locations) equals $4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10$ contacts/day, matching Tutorial 3. |
| 96 | + """) |
| 97 | + return |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +@app.cell |
| 101 | +def _(AgeGroup, Location, mio, np, osecir, total_population): |
| 102 | + def create_model(): |
| 103 | + """Create an OSECIR model with location-specific contact matrices.""" |
| 104 | + m = osecir.Model(1) |
| 105 | + g = AgeGroup(0) |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + # Set infection state stay times (in days) |
| 108 | + m.parameters.TimeExposed[g] = 3.2 |
| 109 | + m.parameters.TimeInfectedNoSymptoms[g] = 2. |
| 110 | + m.parameters.TimeInfectedSymptoms[g] = 6. |
| 111 | + m.parameters.TimeInfectedSevere[g] = 12. |
| 112 | + m.parameters.TimeInfectedCritical[g] = 8. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | + # Set infection state transition probabilities |
| 115 | + m.parameters.RelativeTransmissionNoSymptoms[g] = 0.67 |
| 116 | + m.parameters.TransmissionProbabilityOnContact[g] = 0.1 |
| 117 | + m.parameters.RecoveredPerInfectedNoSymptoms[g] = 0.2 |
| 118 | + m.parameters.RiskOfInfectionFromSymptomatic[g] = 0.25 |
| 119 | + m.parameters.SeverePerInfectedSymptoms[g] = 0.2 |
| 120 | + m.parameters.CriticalPerSevere[g] = 0.25 |
| 121 | + m.parameters.DeathsPerCritical[g] = 0.3 |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | + # Create ContactMatrixGroup: 4 location matrices, each of size 1x1 (one age group) |
| 124 | + contacts = mio.ContactMatrixGroup(4, 1) |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | + # Home contacts: baseline 4/day, minimum 1/day (irreducible household contacts) |
| 127 | + contacts[Location.Home] = mio.ContactMatrix( |
| 128 | + np.array([[4.0]]), np.array([[1.0]])) |
| 129 | + # School contacts: baseline 3/day |
| 130 | + contacts[Location.School] = mio.ContactMatrix( |
| 131 | + np.array([[3.0]]), np.array([[0.0]])) |
| 132 | + # Work contacts: baseline 2/day |
| 133 | + contacts[Location.Work] = mio.ContactMatrix( |
| 134 | + np.array([[2.0]]), np.array([[0.0]])) |
| 135 | + # Other contacts: baseline 1/day |
| 136 | + contacts[Location.Other] = mio.ContactMatrix( |
| 137 | + np.array([[1.0]]), np.array([[0.0]])) |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + m.parameters.ContactPatterns.cont_freq_mat = contacts |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | + # Initial populations: 0.5% Exposed, 0.5% InfectedNoSymptoms, rest Susceptible |
| 142 | + m.populations[g, |
| 143 | + osecir.InfectionState.Exposed] = 0.005 * total_population |
| 144 | + m.populations[g, osecir.InfectionState.InfectedNoSymptoms] = 0.005 * total_population |
| 145 | + m.populations.set_difference_from_total( |
| 146 | + (g, osecir.InfectionState.Susceptible), total_population) |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | + return m |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | + return (create_model,) |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 154 | +def _(mo): |
| 155 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 156 | + ## Baseline Simulation Without NPIs |
| 157 | +
|
| 158 | + We first create and simulate the model without any interventions to obtain a baseline: |
| 159 | + """) |
| 160 | + return |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +@app.cell |
| 164 | +def _(create_model, dt, osecir, t0, tmax): |
| 165 | + model_no_npi = create_model() |
| 166 | + result_no_npi = osecir.simulate(t0, tmax, dt, model_no_npi) |
| 167 | + return (result_no_npi,) |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 171 | +def _(mo): |
| 172 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 173 | + ## Adding Location-specific NPIs |
| 174 | +
|
| 175 | + We now model a lockdown scenario in which three NPIs are activated simultaneously on **day 20**: |
| 176 | +
|
| 177 | + | Intervention | Location | Damping $D$ | Effect | |
| 178 | + |--------------------------|----------|-------------|--------------------------------------------| |
| 179 | + | School closure | School | 1.0 | All school contacts eliminated | |
| 180 | + | Home-office mandate | Work | 0.5 | Work contacts reduced by 50 % | |
| 181 | + | Public transport restriction | Other | 0.8 | Other contacts reduced by 80 % | |
| 182 | +
|
| 183 | + The key difference from Tutorial 3 is that each `Damping` is applied to a **specific location matrix** by indexing `cont_freq_mat[location_index]` before calling `add_damping`. In Tutorial 3, `add_damping` was called on the whole group, reducing **all** contact matrices simultaneously. Home contacts are left unrestricted here, but they cannot fall below the minimum of 1 contact/day regardless. |
| 184 | + """) |
| 185 | + return |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +@app.cell |
| 189 | +def _(Damping, Location, create_model, np): |
| 190 | + t_npi_start = 20.0 # day at which interventions start |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + model_with_npi = create_model() |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | + # School closure: damping of 1.0 -> effective school contacts reach the minimum (0) |
| 195 | + model_with_npi.parameters.ContactPatterns.cont_freq_mat[Location.School].add_damping( |
| 196 | + Damping(coeffs=np.ones((1, 1)) * 1.0, t=t_npi_start, level=0, type=0)) |
| 197 | + # Home-office mandate: damping of 0.5 -> work contacts halved |
| 198 | + model_with_npi.parameters.ContactPatterns.cont_freq_mat[Location.Work].add_damping( |
| 199 | + Damping(coeffs=np.ones((1, 1)) * 0.5, t=t_npi_start, level=0, type=0)) |
| 200 | + # Restrictions in public transport: damping of 0.8 -> other contacts reduced by 80 % |
| 201 | + model_with_npi.parameters.ContactPatterns.cont_freq_mat[Location.Other].add_damping( |
| 202 | + Damping(coeffs=np.ones((1, 1)) * 0.8, t=t_npi_start, level=0, type=0)) |
| 203 | + return model_with_npi, t_npi_start |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 207 | +def _(mo): |
| 208 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 209 | + We can verify the effective total contact rates before and after the NPIs by evaluating the contact matrix group at a specific point in time: |
| 210 | + """) |
| 211 | + return |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +@app.cell |
| 215 | +def _(model_with_npi, t_npi_start): |
| 216 | + contacts_before = model_with_npi.parameters.ContactPatterns.cont_freq_mat.get_matrix_at( |
| 217 | + t_npi_start - 1) |
| 218 | + contacts_after = model_with_npi.parameters.ContactPatterns.cont_freq_mat.get_matrix_at( |
| 219 | + t_npi_start + 1) |
| 220 | + print( |
| 221 | + f"Total contacts before NPIs (day {t_npi_start - 1:.0f}): {contacts_before[0, 0]} / day") |
| 222 | + print( |
| 223 | + f"Total contacts after NPIs (day {t_npi_start + 1:.0f}): {contacts_after[0, 0]} / day") |
| 224 | + return |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 228 | +def _(mo): |
| 229 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 230 | + We simulate the NPI scenario from `t0` to `tmax`: |
| 231 | + """) |
| 232 | + return |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +@app.cell |
| 236 | +def _(dt, model_with_npi, osecir, t0, tmax): |
| 237 | + result_with_npi = osecir.simulate(t0, tmax, dt, model_with_npi) |
| 238 | + return (result_with_npi,) |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 242 | +def _(mo): |
| 243 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 244 | + ## Visualization of Model Output |
| 245 | +
|
| 246 | + We plot and compare the `InfectedSymptoms` trajectories from both scenarios. The vertical dashed line marks the onset of the NPIs on day 20: |
| 247 | + """) |
| 248 | + return |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +@app.cell |
| 252 | +def _(osecir, plt, result_no_npi, result_with_npi, t_npi_start): |
| 253 | + arr_no_npi = result_no_npi.as_ndarray() |
| 254 | + arr_with_npi = result_with_npi.as_ndarray() |
| 255 | + |
| 256 | + inf_idx = 1 + int(osecir.InfectionState.InfectedSymptoms) |
| 257 | + |
| 258 | + fig, ax = plt.subplots() |
| 259 | + ax.plot(arr_no_npi[0], arr_no_npi[inf_idx], |
| 260 | + label='Without NPIs', color='tab:blue') |
| 261 | + ax.plot( |
| 262 | + arr_with_npi[0], |
| 263 | + arr_with_npi[inf_idx], |
| 264 | + label='With location-specific NPIs', linestyle='--', |
| 265 | + color='tab:orange') |
| 266 | + ax.axvline(x=t_npi_start, color='gray', linestyle=':', |
| 267 | + label=f'NPI start (day {int(t_npi_start)})') |
| 268 | + ax.set_xlabel('Time [days]') |
| 269 | + ax.set_ylabel('Individuals [#]') |
| 270 | + ax.set_title('Effect of Location-specific NPIs on InfectedSymptoms') |
| 271 | + ax.legend() |
| 272 | + plt.show() |
| 273 | + return |
| 274 | + |
| 275 | + |
| 276 | +@app.cell(hide_code=True) |
| 277 | +def _(mo): |
| 278 | + mo.md(r""" |
| 279 | + The NPIs substantially flatten the infection curve. After day 20, school contacts drop to zero, work contacts are halved, and other contacts are reduced by 80 %. Only household contacts remain, bounded from below by their minimum of 1 contact/day. |
| 280 | +
|
| 281 | + ## Summary and Next Steps |
| 282 | +
|
| 283 | + In this tutorial, we have introduced location-specific contact patterns via `ContactMatrixGroup` and applied targeted NPIs to individual location matrices. Key takeaways: |
| 284 | +
|
| 285 | + - A `ContactMatrixGroup` collects one `ContactMatrix` per location (Home, School, Work, Other). |
| 286 | + - Each `ContactMatrix` has a **baseline** (normal contacts) and a **minimum** (irreducible lower bound). |
| 287 | + - Location-specific NPIs are applied with `cont_freq_mat[location_index].add_damping(...)`. In contrast, Tutorial 3 used `cont_freq_mat.add_damping(...)` which applies to **all** matrices simultaneously. |
| 288 | + - The effective contact rate per location is $C_\text{eff} = C_\text{baseline} - D \cdot (C_\text{baseline} - C_\text{minimum})$, and the ODE model receives the **sum** over all locations. |
| 289 | +
|
| 290 | + In the next tutorial, we will extend this framework with **dynamic NPIs** that are triggered automatically when infection thresholds are exceeded. |
| 291 | + """) |
| 292 | + return |
| 293 | + |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | +if __name__ == "__main__": |
| 296 | + app.run() |
0 commit comments