X-POSURE Expansion Plan: "Expose Everything"

Date: 2025-12-22 Vision: Expose every delicate detail of a target with a single click Current State: 66 / 1036 credential types (6.4% coverage) Goal: Match or exceed TruffleHog's detection capabilities for web targets

Executive Summary

The Problem: X-POSURE currently detects only 6.4% of credential types that TruffleHog can find. For the vision of "exposing everything about a target," this is unacceptable.

The Gap: 970 missing credential types (93.6%)

The Solution: Systematic expansion across 10 priority tiers to reach 800+ credential types within 3-6 months.

Current State Analysis

✅ What X-POSURE Has (66 types)

Strengths:

Good cloud coverage: AWS (3), Azure (5), GCP (3), DigitalOcean (2), Alibaba (2)
Excellent AI/ML coverage: OpenAI (4), Anthropic, Cohere, HuggingFace, Stability, Replicate, Mistral, Pinecone, Weaviate, WandB, LangSmith
Solid VCS: GitHub (5), GitLab (3), Bitbucket (1)
Good communication: Slack (4), Discord (2), Twilio (2), Telegram, SendGrid, Mailgun, Zendesk
Basic payment: Stripe (3), PayPal, Square (2), Braintree
Essential databases: MongoDB, Postgres, MySQL, Redis, Supabase, Firebase

Weaknesses:

Only 1 monitoring tool (Zendesk - which is actually support, not monitoring)
Only 1 CI/CD tool (Terraform)
Zero secret management tools
Zero container/orchestration tools
Zero CMS/e-commerce beyond basic
Zero security/compliance tools
Minimal productivity/SaaS tools

❌ Critical Gaps (93.6% missing)

TruffleHog has 1036 detector types covering:

100+ cloud/infrastructure providers
50+ AI/ML services
30+ VCS integrations
80+ communication platforms
40+ payment processors
60+ database types
50+ CI/CD tools
40+ monitoring/observability platforms
30+ authentication providers
100+ productivity/SaaS tools
30+ container/orchestration platforms
20+ secret management tools
50+ CMS/e-commerce platforms
30+ security/compliance tools
400+ niche/specialized APIs

The Expansion Strategy

Philosophy: Quality Over Quantity, But Comprehensive Coverage

We need to add ~900+ credential types, but not all are equal. Strategy:

Tier 1 (Critical - Week 1): High-impact types commonly found in web apps
Tier 2 (Essential - Week 2-3): Common enterprise/startup infrastructure
Tier 3 (Important - Week 4-6): Additional cloud, SaaS, and dev tools
Tier 4 (Useful - Week 7-9): Niche but valuable services
Tier 5 (Long-tail - Week 10-12): Comprehensive coverage for "expose everything"

Tier 1: Critical Additions (Week 1)

Target: +100 types → 166 total Effort: 40 hours Impact: CRITICAL - These are everywhere

1.1 Missing Cloud Giants (15 types)

Cloudflare: API tokens, workers tokens, R2 keys, global API keys
Vercel: API tokens, team tokens
Netlify: API tokens, build hooks
IBM Cloud: API keys, service credentials
Oracle Cloud: API keys, auth tokens
Render: API tokens
Fly.io: API tokens, auth tokens
Railway: API tokens

Why: These are the second-tier cloud providers commonly found in modern web apps.

1.2 Critical AI/ML Services (12 types)

Google AI (Gemini): API keys
xAI (Grok): API keys
ElevenLabs: API keys
DeepSeek: API keys
Groq: API keys
Together AI: API keys
Perplexity: API keys
Anyscale: API keys
Langfuse: API keys
Weights & Biases: (Already have wandb_api_key ✓)

Why: AI integration is exploding. Every startup uses these.

1.3 Essential Monitoring/Observability (15 types)

Datadog: API keys, app keys
New Relic: API keys, license keys, insights keys
Sentry: DSN, auth tokens, org tokens
Grafana: API keys, service account tokens
Splunk: HEC tokens, auth tokens
Honeycomb: API keys
Better Stack: API tokens
Loggly: API tokens
LogzIO: API tokens

Why: EVERY production web app has monitoring. High-value targets.

1.4 Critical CI/CD & DevOps (20 types)

CircleCI: API tokens, project tokens
TravisCI: API tokens
Jenkins: API tokens, credentials
BuildKite: API tokens
DroneCI: API tokens
GitHub Actions: secrets (composite detection)
GitLab CI: tokens, registry tokens
Azure Pipelines: PATs
Pulumi: access tokens
Docker Hub: access tokens, passwords
Kubernetes: kubeconfig, service account tokens
Nomad: ACL tokens
Portainer: API keys

Why: CI/CD pipelines = keys to the kingdom. Always exposed in configs.

1.5 Container & Orchestration (10 types)

Docker: registry tokens, hub tokens
Kubernetes: kubeconfig, secrets
Portainer: API tokens
Rancher: API keys, tokens
Nomad: ACL tokens

Why: Modern infra = containers. These are critical.

1.6 Secret Management (10 types)

HashiCorp Vault: tokens, root tokens
Doppler: service tokens, personal tokens
Infisical: API tokens
1Password: service account tokens
AWS Secrets Manager: (detected via AWS keys)

Why: Ironically, secret managers get leaked too. High value.

1.7 Critical SaaS/Productivity (15 types)

Notion: API tokens, integration tokens
Airtable: personal tokens, OAuth tokens
Jira: API tokens, personal tokens
Asana: personal tokens, OAuth tokens
Linear: API keys, OAuth tokens
Monday.com: API tokens
ClickUp: API tokens, personal tokens
Confluence: API tokens

Why: Every startup uses these. Found in automation scripts.

1.8 Additional Payment Processors (8 types)

Checkout.com: API keys, secret keys
Adyen: API keys
Paddle: API keys, vendor ID
LemonSqueezy: API keys
Chargebee: API keys

Why: Payment = direct money access. Critical security risk.

Tier 2: Essential Additions (Week 2-3)

Target: +150 types → 316 total Effort: 80 hours Impact: HIGH - Common in enterprise/scale-ups

2.1 Communication Platforms (25 types)

Microsoft Teams: webhooks, bot tokens
Webex: bot tokens, access tokens
RingCentral: API tokens
MessageBird: API keys
Postmark: API tokens
Mailjet: API keys, secrets
Customer.io: API keys
Intercom: access tokens
Drift: API tokens
Freshdesk: API keys

2.2 Authentication/Identity (20 types)

Auth0: client secrets, management tokens, M2M tokens
Okta: API tokens, OAuth tokens
OneLogin: API tokens
Clerk: API keys
WorkOS: API keys
Supabase Auth: (already have supabase ✓)

2.3 CMS & E-commerce (30 types)

Shopify: API keys, access tokens, webhooks
WooCommerce: API keys
Contentful: content delivery keys, preview keys, management tokens
Strapi: API tokens
Sanity: API tokens
WordPress: application passwords
Ghost: admin API keys, content API keys
Webflow: API tokens
Squarespace: API keys
BigCommerce: API tokens

2.4 More Cloud Services (30 types)

Cloudflare: (expand from tier 1 - workers KV, durable objects, etc.)
Akamai: API tokens, EdgeGrid tokens
Fastly: API tokens
BunnyCDN: API keys
PlanetScale: connection strings, tokens
Aiven: API tokens, connection strings
Couchbase: connection strings
CockroachDB: connection strings

2.5 Developer Tools (25 types)

NPM: tokens, auth tokens
PyPI: tokens, API tokens
RubyGems: API keys
Packagist: tokens
NuGet: API keys
GitHub Packages: (covered by GitHub)
JFrog Artifactory: API keys, tokens
Sonatype Nexus: tokens
Cloudsmith: API keys
PackageCloud: tokens

2.6 Testing & QA (20 types)

BrowserStack: access keys
Sauce Labs: access keys
Percy: tokens
Chromatic: project tokens
Playwright: (no API keys typically)
Cypress: record keys

Tier 3: Important Additions (Week 4-6)

Target: +200 types → 516 total Effort: 120 hours Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH - Specialized but common

3.1 Security & Compliance (40 types)

Wiz: API tokens
Snyk: API tokens, org tokens
Qualys: API credentials
Tenable: API keys, secret keys
Detectify: API tokens
Shodan: API keys
Censys: API tokens
VirusTotal: API keys
AbuseIPDB: API keys
SecurityTrails: API keys

3.2 More Database Types (30 types)

Elasticsearch: API keys, passwords
InfluxDB: tokens
TimescaleDB: connection strings
Cassandra: credentials
Neo4j: credentials
RavenDB: API keys
DynamoDB: (AWS keys)
CosmosDB: (Azure keys)
FaunaDB: secrets

3.3 Analytics & Data (35 types)

Mixpanel: project tokens, service accounts
Amplitude: API keys, secret keys
Segment: write keys, API tokens
Google Analytics: (OAuth, measurement protocol)
PostHog: personal API keys, project keys
Heap: app ID (not secret)
FullStory: API keys
LogRocket: API tokens
Snowplow: (various endpoints)

3.4 More AI/ML Platforms (25 types)

Hugging Face: (already have ✓)
Modal: API tokens
RunPod: API keys
Lambda Labs: API keys
CoreWeave: API keys
Stability AI: (already have ✓)
Midjourney: (no public API)
Dall-E: (OpenAI keys)

3.5 Marketing & Sales (35 types)

HubSpot: API keys, private app tokens
Salesforce: (already have OAuth ✓)
Marketo: client ID/secret
Pardot: API keys
ActiveCampaign: API keys
Mailchimp: API keys
Constant Contact: API keys
ConvertKit: API keys, secret keys

3.6 Video & Media (20 types)

Mux: signing keys, access tokens
Cloudinary: API key/secret
Imgix: API tokens
Vimeo: access tokens
YouTube: API keys (Google)
Twitch: OAuth tokens, client IDs

3.7 Storage & CDN (15 types)

AWS S3: (covered by AWS ✓)
Google Cloud Storage: (covered by GCP ✓)
Azure Blob: (covered by Azure ✓)
Backblaze B2: application keys
Wasabi: access keys
Spaces: (DigitalOcean, already have ✓)

Tier 4: Useful Additions (Week 7-9)

Target: +200 types → 716 total Effort: 120 hours Impact: MEDIUM - Nice to have, fills gaps

4.1 Finance & Accounting (30 types)

QuickBooks: OAuth tokens
Xero: OAuth tokens
FreshBooks: OAuth tokens
Wave: API tokens
Plaid: client ID/secret, access tokens
Dwolla: API key/secret
Yodlee: API keys

4.2 HR & Recruitment (25 types)

BambooHR: API keys
Greenhouse: API tokens
Lever: API keys
Workday: credentials
ADP: API credentials
Gusto: API tokens

4.3 Social Media (25 types)

Twitter/X: API keys, bearer tokens, access tokens
Facebook: access tokens, app secrets
Instagram: access tokens
LinkedIn: access tokens, client secrets
TikTok: access tokens
Reddit: client ID/secret

4.4 Form & Survey Tools (20 types)

Typeform: API tokens
Google Forms: (OAuth)
SurveyMonkey: access tokens
Qualtrics: API tokens
JotForm: API keys
Formstack: API keys

4.5 Scheduling & Calendar (15 types)

Calendly: API tokens, webhooks
Cal.com: API keys
Acuity: API keys
Chili Piper: API keys
Savvycal: API keys

4.6 More Infrastructure (30 types)

Terraform Cloud: (already have ✓)
Ansible: vault passwords
Puppet: API tokens
Chef: API keys
SaltStack: credentials

4.7 Blockchain & Web3 (30 types)

Etherscan: API keys
Infura: project IDs, secrets
Alchemy: API keys
Moralis: API keys
Coinbase: API keys, secrets
Binance: API keys, secrets
Kraken: API keys

4.8 Messaging & Chat (25 types)

SendBird: app ID, API tokens
PubNub: publish/subscribe keys
Pusher: app keys, secrets
Ably: API keys
Stream: API keys, secrets

Tier 5: Long-tail Coverage (Week 10-12)

Target: +300 types → 1000+ total Effort: 150 hours Impact: COMPREHENSIVE - "Expose everything"

This tier includes:

100+ niche SaaS APIs
50+ regional cloud providers
50+ legacy systems
50+ specialized industry tools
50+ misc services

Examples:

Weather APIs (OpenWeather, WeatherStack, etc.)
Geo APIs (Google Maps, Mapbox, etc.)
SMS providers (Twilio covered, but 20+ others)
Email verification services
Image processing services
Document generation services
Translation services
OCR services
Voice/speech APIs
IoT platforms
Gaming platforms
Travel/booking APIs
Sports data APIs
Financial data APIs

Verification Strategy

Current Verifiers (5)

AWS → STS GetCallerIdentity
GitHub → /user API
Slack → auth.test
Stripe → /v1/account
OpenAI → /v1/models

Verification Expansion Plan

Phase 1: Essential Verifiers (Week 1-2, +15 verifiers)

High-ROI verifications:

GCP → OAuth2 tokeninfo endpoint
Azure → Microsoft Graph /me
DigitalOcean → /v2/account
Cloudflare → /user
Vercel → /v2/user
Netlify → /api/v1/user
Datadog → /api/v1/validate
Sentry → /api/0/
GitLab → /api/v4/user
Bitbucket → /2.0/user
Docker Hub → /v2/user
SendGrid → /v3/scopes
Twilio → API validation
MongoDB Atlas → connection test
Supabase → project info API

Phase 2: Common Services (Week 3-4, +25 verifiers)

Notion → /v1/users/me
Airtable → /v0/meta/whoami
Jira → /rest/api/3/myself
Linear → GraphQL whoami
HubSpot → /integrations/v1/me
CircleCI → /me
Terraform Cloud → /account/details
New Relic → API key validation
Grafana → /api/org
Anthropic → /v1/models (similar to OpenAI) 26-40... (more services)

Phase 3: Specialized (Week 5-6, +30 verifiers)

Focus on payment processors, cloud providers, AI services

Phase 4: Generic HTTP Validators (Week 7+)

For services without specific APIs:

Generic GET endpoint check
Generic POST endpoint check
Response status code analysis
Error message pattern matching

Goal: 70+ active verifiers by end of expansion

Implementation Plan

Week 1: Foundation & Tier 1 Critical (40h)

Day 1-2: Infrastructure prep

Fix pyjsparser dependency issue
Create rule template generator
Setup bulk testing framework

Day 3-7: Add Tier 1 types

Cloud giants (15 types) → 2 days
AI/ML (12 types) → 1 day
Monitoring (15 types) → 2 days
CI/CD (20 types) → 2 days
Containers (10 types) → 1 day
Secret mgmt (10 types) → 1 day
SaaS (15 types) → 1 day
Payment (8 types) → 0.5 day

Deliverable: 166 total types, +15 verifiers

Week 2-3: Tier 2 Essential (80h)

Focus: Enterprise/common services

Communication (25 types)
Authentication (20 types)
CMS/E-commerce (30 types)
Cloud services (30 types)
Dev tools (25 types)
Testing (20 types)

Deliverable: 316 total types, +25 verifiers

Week 4-6: Tier 3 Important (120h)

Focus: Specialized but valuable

Security (40 types)
Databases (30 types)
Analytics (35 types)
AI/ML (25 types)
Marketing (35 types)
Media (20 types)
Storage/CDN (15 types)

Deliverable: 516 total types, +30 verifiers

Week 7-9: Tier 4 Useful (120h)

Focus: Fill category gaps

Finance (30 types)
HR (25 types)
Social (25 types)
Forms (20 types)
Scheduling (15 types)
Infrastructure (30 types)
Blockchain (30 types)
Messaging (25 types)

Deliverable: 716 total types, +0 verifiers (focus on detection)

Week 10-12: Tier 5 Comprehensive (150h)

Focus: Long-tail coverage

300+ niche APIs across all categories
Polish existing detectors
Optimize performance
Documentation

Deliverable: 1000+ total types, final polish

Technical Implementation Details

Rule File Organization

Current structure:

xposure/rules/
├── cloud.yaml       (15 rules → expand to 80)
├── ai.yaml          (16 rules → expand to 60)
├── vcs.yaml         (10 rules → expand to 30)
├── communication.yaml (13 rules → expand to 50)
├── payment.yaml     (7 rules → expand to 30)
├── database.yaml    (6 rules → expand to 40)

Proposed structure:

xposure/rules/
├── cloud/
│   ├── aws.yaml
│   ├── azure.yaml
│   ├── gcp.yaml
│   ├── cloudflare.yaml
│   ├── vercel.yaml
│   ├── netlify.yaml
│   └── ... (20 files, 150 rules)
├── ai/
│   ├── openai.yaml
│   ├── anthropic.yaml
│   ├── google_ai.yaml
│   └── ... (15 files, 60 rules)
├── devops/
│   ├── cicd.yaml
│   ├── containers.yaml
│   ├── monitoring.yaml
│   ├── secrets.yaml
│   └── ... (10 files, 100 rules)
├── saas/
│   ├── productivity.yaml
│   ├── crm.yaml
│   ├── analytics.yaml
│   └── ... (20 files, 200 rules)
└── ... (total: 100 files, 1000+ rules)

Rule Template

rules:
  - id: service_credential_type
    name: Service Name Credential Type
    type: service_credential_type
    severity: critical|high|medium|low|info

    # Detection pattern
    pattern: 'regex_pattern_here'
    capture_group: 1  # optional

    # Pairing (if applicable)
    pair_with: other_credential_type

    # Context requirements
    context_required: true|false
    context_patterns:
      - 'context_pattern_1'
      - 'context_pattern_2'

    # Exclusions
    exclude_patterns:
      - 'false_positive_pattern_1'
      - 'false_positive_pattern_2'

    # Verification
    verifier: service_verifier_name  # or null

    # Metadata
    metadata:
      provider: service_name
      service: specific_service
      category: cloud|ai|devops|saas|etc
      docs: https://docs.service.com/api-keys
      common_locations:
        - .env
        - config.json
        - source code

    # Remediation
    remediation: |
      1. Immediately revoke the exposed credential
      2. Generate new credentials
      3. Update all services using the old credential
      4. Audit access logs for unauthorized use
      5. Implement proper secret management

Automation Scripts

1. Rule Generator (scripts/generate_rule.py)

# Interactive CLI to generate new rules
# Inputs: service name, credential pattern, docs URL
# Output: YAML rule file

2. Bulk Importer (scripts/import_trufflehog_rules.py)

# Parse TruffleHog detector definitions
# Convert to X-POSURE YAML format
# Requires manual review but saves 80% of time

3. Rule Validator (scripts/validate_rules.py)

# Validates all YAML files
# Checks for:
#   - Valid regex patterns
#   - No duplicate IDs
#   - Valid severity levels
#   - Proper metadata

4. Test Generator (scripts/generate_tests.py)

# Auto-generates test cases from rules
# Creates positive and negative examples

Verification Implementation

Generic Verifier Framework

class GenericHTTPVerifier(BaseVerifier):
    """Generic HTTP-based verification for APIs."""

    def __init__(self, config: dict):
        self.endpoint = config['endpoint']
        self.method = config.get('method', 'GET')
        self.auth_header = config.get('auth_header', 'Authorization')
        self.auth_prefix = config.get('auth_prefix', 'Bearer')
        self.success_codes = config.get('success_codes', [200, 201])
        self.success_patterns = config.get('success_patterns', [])
        self.error_patterns = config.get('error_patterns', [])

    async def verify(self, credential: str) -> VerificationResult:
        # Generic HTTP verification logic
        pass

Configuration file:

# xposure/verify/configs/services.yaml
services:
  notion:
    endpoint: https://api.notion.com/v1/users/me
    method: GET
    auth_header: Authorization
    auth_prefix: Bearer
    success_codes: [200]
    success_patterns: ['\"object\":\"user\"']
    error_patterns: ['unauthorized', 'invalid_token']

  airtable:
    endpoint: https://api.airtable.com/v0/meta/whoami
    method: GET
    auth_header: Authorization
    auth_prefix: Bearer
    success_codes: [200]
    success_patterns: ['\"id\":\"usr']

  # ... 100+ more services

This allows adding new verifiers without writing Python code.

Performance Considerations

Current Architecture

Async HTTP requests
Concurrent processing
Rate limiting per provider

Optimizations Needed

1. Rule Matching Optimization

Current: Loop through all rules for each content chunk
Proposed: Trie-based prefix matching for 10x speedup
Estimated gain: 200ms → 20ms per content scan

2. Caching Layer

Cache compiled regex patterns
Cache verification results (1 hour TTL)
Cache decoded content

3. Smart Sampling

Don't scan every single JS file (too slow with 1000 rules)
Prioritize: configs > env files > source maps > main JS > vendor JS
Sample large files instead of scanning entirely

4. Parallel Processing

Current: Sequential rule matching
Proposed: Batch process with multiprocessing for CPU-bound regex
Estimated gain: 4x speedup on multi-core systems

5. Progressive Disclosure

Stream results as found (already implemented ✓)
Show high-confidence findings first
Background verification of medium-confidence findings

Testing Strategy

Unit Tests

# Test each rule individually
pytest tests/rules/test_cloud.py
pytest tests/rules/test_ai.py
# ... etc

Integration Tests

# Test end-to-end with synthetic data
pytest tests/integration/test_full_scan.py

Benchmark Tests

# Performance benchmarks
pytest tests/benchmarks/test_rule_matching_speed.py
pytest tests/benchmarks/test_verification_speed.py

False Positive Testing

# Test against known false positive datasets
pytest tests/fp/test_false_positives.py

Real-world Testing

# Test against known vulnerable sites (with permission)
python -m xposure testsite.example.com --benchmark

Quality Metrics

Detection Quality

True Positive Rate: >95%
False Positive Rate: <5%
Coverage: 1000+ credential types
Detection Speed: <1s per file

Verification Quality

Verification Accuracy: >98%
Verification Coverage: 70+ services (7% of types)
Verification Speed: <500ms per credential
Error Handling: Graceful degradation on API failures

Overall Performance

Full Domain Scan: <5 minutes for typical site
Memory Usage: <500MB for typical scan
Network Efficiency: <1000 requests per scan
Result Quality: <10% unverified findings

Risk Mitigation

Risks & Mitigation Strategies

Risk 1: Regex Performance Degradation

Mitigation: Pre-compile all patterns, use atomic grouping, timeout protection
Backup: Fall back to simple string matching for complex patterns

Risk 2: False Positive Explosion

Mitigation: Mandatory testing for each new rule, exclusion patterns, entropy filtering
Backup: Confidence scoring helps users filter noise

Risk 3: Verification Rate Limiting

Mitigation: Exponential backoff, respect rate limits, batch verifications
Backup: Queue verification for later, allow manual retry

Risk 4: Maintenance Burden

Mitigation: Automated rule updates from TruffleHog, community contributions
Backup: Focus on high-value detectors first, deprecate low-value ones

Risk 5: API Changes Breaking Verifiers

Mitigation: Version pinning, graceful degradation, automated testing
Backup: Fall back to passive verification

Success Criteria

Phase 1 (Week 1-3): Foundation

✅ 300+ credential types ✅ 40+ active verifiers ✅ <5% false positive rate ✅ All critical services covered

Phase 2 (Week 4-6): Expansion

✅ 500+ credential types ✅ 60+ active verifiers ✅ Automated rule generation ✅ Comprehensive testing

Phase 3 (Week 7-9): Completion

✅ 700+ credential types ✅ 70+ active verifiers ✅ Performance optimized ✅ Documentation complete

Phase 4 (Week 10-12): Excellence

✅ 1000+ credential types ✅ 70+ active verifiers ✅ Benchmark published ✅ Community adoption

Resource Requirements

Development Time

Total Effort: ~600 hours
Timeline: 12 weeks
Team Size: 1-2 developers
Breakdown:
- Week 1-3: 120h (foundation)
- Week 4-6: 120h (expansion)
- Week 7-9: 120h (completion)
- Week 10-12: 150h (excellence)
- Testing/QA: 90h (ongoing)

Infrastructure

Development: Local machine
Testing: Cloud sandbox accounts for verification testing
CI/CD: GitHub Actions for automated testing
Documentation: GitHub wiki or docs site

External Resources

TruffleHog detector repository (reference)
Provider API documentation
Secret scanning test datasets
Community contributions

Conclusion

The Path Forward:

X-POSURE can achieve its vision of "exposing everything about a target with a single click" by systematically expanding from 66 → 1000+ credential types over 12 weeks.

Key Success Factors:

Systematic approach: Tiered expansion prioritizing high-impact types
Automation: Template generators, bulk importers, automated testing
Quality: Mandatory testing, false positive filtering, verification
Performance: Optimized matching, caching, parallel processing
Sustainability: Clear documentation, community contribution path

Bottom Line:

Current: 6.4% coverage, limited utility
After 3 weeks: 30% coverage, production-ready for most targets
After 6 weeks: 50% coverage, comprehensive for common services
After 12 weeks: 95%+ coverage, truly "expose everything"

This is achievable, measurable, and will make X-POSURE the definitive tool for web-based credential discovery.

Next Steps

Approve this plan ✓
Fix pyjsparser dependency (blocker)
Create rule generator script (automation)
Begin Tier 1 additions (week 1)
Setup automated testing (quality)
Start weekly progress tracking (accountability)

Let's make X-POSURE truly expose everything. 🔥

FilesExpand file tree

EXPOSURE_EXPANSION_PLAN.md

Latest commit

History