Skip to content

License Discussion #50

Description

@wang-rui

After examining the other license options for our project. We decided to stay with our original choice MIT license.

We believe our license is appropriate for the following reasons:

  • MIT license is a very commonly used license which means most people already know about it.
  • We believe the MIT license, as a widely used practice, has covered most of the copyright rules for the project.
  • The license is also designed for open-source package development, which will help us to waive some liabilities.
  • The license is business-friendly and open-source-friendly while still allowing for monetization.
  • The license will help us protect the copyright of our code and prevent potential lawsuits.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions