Skip to content

Commit b7abec8

Browse files
authored
Create 20251017.md
1 parent 5e8eda2 commit b7abec8

1 file changed

Lines changed: 114 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

meeting_notes/20251017.md

Lines changed: 114 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
1+
## Meeting 17 Oct
2+
3+
### Agenda
4+
5+
- Action points from last meeting
6+
- Schedule
7+
- Admin
8+
9+
### Action points (DECIDED in May)
10+
- More InfraVis-like collaborations demoing usecases
11+
- When? **ML afternoon** 2 Dec
12+
- Data visualization
13+
- This iteration? Yes
14+
- Who does? Jayant
15+
- Move 'Slurm and batch jobs' from Day 3 to Day 2:
16+
- BC: We already had the introduction?
17+
- OK toatally second day
18+
- Pinning versions on the clusters (already doing it partially)
19+
- prereqs
20+
- courses
21+
- login/transfer
22+
- modules
23+
- slurm: keep condensed session focus on Python
24+
- Will will run Markdown next time
25+
- Still yes??
26+
- BC: MkDocs should be used then directly
27+
- 2-step is too expensive (md with sphinx)
28+
- Delay to May: BC, PO, RP, JY, BB
29+
- Times
30+
- Have 15m always
31+
- Lunch 60 min
32+
- Give Anders Hast more time
33+
- In ML session: YES
34+
- DECIDED Mark exercises as **important** and optional: RB, BB, BC
35+
- IDEs: keep the schedule as it is
36+
- DECIDED Present all 3 IDEs but parallel exercise tracks (where learners decide themselves): BC, RP,
37+
- Videos
38+
- DECIDED Youtube playlist + table on course web (also NAISS web)
39+
- the latest available (living table)
40+
41+
#### Not decided because postponed
42+
43+
- Recordings
44+
- DECIDED: always before or during
45+
46+
- Exercise rooms (perhaps later decision)
47+
- Let teachers decide how they teach: RB
48+
- always try to keep 2-3 persons in each room (BC and RB has good experience here): RB
49+
- larger rooms: RB
50+
- cluster rooms: RB
51+
- combination of above: RB
52+
- [Richel] One fun thing we did in another course, is to let the learners rename themselves, to include the cluster name, e.g. `Thora` becomes `[Dardel] Thora`
53+
- Let teachers decide how they teach: RB
54+
- Let's do this in the introduction: RB
55+
- [Richel] In some courses we measure the initial confidence our learners have at the start,
56+
such as [Day 1](https://uppmax.github.io/naiss_intro_python/evaluations/20250424/#analysis-pre-and-post).
57+
What about we do this at the other days too?
58+
- Never measure the initial confidence: RB, RP
59+
- Keep it as it is: RB
60+
- DECIDED Let's try to measure the initial confidence at **each **day: RB, BC, BB
61+
- Need to formulate well in such case
62+
- BB: Interconnected courses: we need to connect our courses better
63+
- Use a working group (i.e. one working group per workshop): BC, RB
64+
- Agree: RB, BB
65+
- Not yet:
66+
- No:
67+
- Just make sure students know which courses should be taken in what order - need to decide on "curriculum"?
68+
- JY: ML/DL should be more about workflows than core principles.
69+
Core principles should be its own separate course.
70+
- Yes (next time): BC
71+
- no
72+
- JY: Do HPC centeres have the packages by Google Collabs?
73+
- yes:
74+
- no: To be discusses in future
75+
- JY: Recording professionalisms, there are better tools than Zoom
76+
- Postpone
77+
- JY: How to do recordings, i.e. blurring out names?
78+
- BB: knows the GDPR rules
79+
- Postpone
80+
81+
### [Schedule](https://github.com/UPPMAX/HPC-python/blob/main/docs/schedule.rst)
82+
83+
#### Input
84+
- less of matplotlib, pandas, seaborn
85+
- DECIDED keep some: BC
86+
- (good to understand how to make graphics avail and as prereq to big data)? BC
87+
- matplot/pandas 45-50 m x 1
88+
- load+examples+what they can get out of it + workflows
89+
- before big data; mention ML prep, memory-saving datatypes
90+
- <s>VOTE remove all? RP (overruled)</s>
91+
92+
#### Fri
93+
- **Theme: packages and IDEs + basic HPC including batch jobs and allocating GPUs?**
94+
- load-run (skip or shorten because included in first day?)
95+
- longer with packages (perhaps input from pavlin about pixi and uv)
96+
- intro to slurm and interactive (only)
97+
- IDEs
98+
- we are lacking analysis: should we remove all YES
99+
#### Mon
100+
- **Theme: Running and analysing**
101+
- GPU (intro + Python specific)
102+
- analyzing: short versions of earlier (matplotlib, pandas, seaborn)
103+
- big data (dask)
104+
- we are lacking analysis: should we remove all?
105+
#### Tue
106+
- **Theme: ML and development?**
107+
- parallelism in morning 2 hrs
108+
- ML
109+
110+
### Todos
111+
- Björn renews schedule
112+
- Further details discussed in chat
113+
114+
## [Notes from previous meeting](https://github.com/UPPMAX/HPC-python/blob/main/meeting_notes/20250522.md)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)