You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: monte-carlo/analog_vs_caw_efficiency.ipynb
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
13
13
"Goal: This exercise compares error estimates of spatially-resolved reflectance using Analog versus Continuous Absorption Weighting (CAW) simulations. \n",
14
14
"It is assumed that\n",
15
15
"\n",
16
-
"* A version of .NET has been installed that is consistent with the VTS libraries version (see below)\n",
16
+
"* A version of [.NET](https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/download) has been installed that is consistent with the VTS libraries version (see below)\n",
17
17
"\n",
18
18
"* The latest [VTS libraries](https://github.com/VirtualPhotonics/Vts.Scripting.Python/releases) have been downloaded from the zip file in releases and extracted to the libraries folder"
0 commit comments