|
| 1 | +# How to Use Field-Level Diagnostics |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +This guide shows how to capture and inspect field-level diagnostic metadata during data migrations, giving you fine-grained visibility into which fields each rule affects. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Overview |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Standard type-level diagnostics tell you that a rule matched on a particular type, but not which fields were renamed, removed, or transformed. Field-level diagnostics solve this by capturing structured `FieldOperation` metadata for every field-aware rule application. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +Key points: |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +- Field-level diagnostics are **opt-in** via `DiagnosticOptions.captureFieldDetails(true)` (enabled by default in `defaults()`) |
| 12 | +- Rules created by the field operation methods in `Rules` automatically implement `FieldAwareRule` |
| 13 | +- After migration, inspect `RuleApplication.fieldOperations()` for per-field metadata |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## Quick Start |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +```java |
| 18 | +import de.splatgames.aether.datafixers.api.diagnostic.*; |
| 19 | +import de.splatgames.aether.datafixers.api.rewrite.Rules; |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +// 1. Create rules using Rules factory methods |
| 22 | +TypeRewriteRule rule = Rules.renameField(ops, "playerName", "name"); |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +// 2. The rule automatically implements FieldAwareRule — no extra work needed |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +// 3. Run migration with a DiagnosticContext |
| 27 | +DiagnosticContext context = DiagnosticContext.create(); |
| 28 | +Dynamic<JsonElement> result = fixer.update( |
| 29 | + TypeReferences.PLAYER, inputData, |
| 30 | + new DataVersion(1), new DataVersion(2), |
| 31 | + context |
| 32 | +); |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +// 4. Inspect field operations in the report |
| 35 | +MigrationReport report = context.getReport(); |
| 36 | +for (FixExecution fix : report.fixExecutions()) { |
| 37 | + for (RuleApplication rule : fix.ruleApplications()) { |
| 38 | + for (FieldOperation op : rule.fieldOperations()) { |
| 39 | + System.out.println(op.toSummary()); |
| 40 | + // Output: RENAME(playerName -> name) |
| 41 | + } |
| 42 | + } |
| 43 | +} |
| 44 | +``` |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +## Which Rules Are Field-Aware? |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +All field operation methods in `Rules` produce rules that implement `FieldAwareRule`: |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +**Single-field operations:** |
| 51 | +- `renameField`, `removeField`, `addField`, `transformField`, `setField` |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +**Batch operations:** |
| 54 | +- `renameFields`, `removeFields` |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +**Structural operations:** |
| 57 | +- `groupFields`, `flattenField`, `moveField`, `copyField` |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +**Path-based operations (nested fields):** |
| 60 | +- `renameFieldAt`, `removeFieldAt`, `addFieldAt`, `transformFieldAt` |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +**Conditional operations:** |
| 63 | +- `ifFieldExists`, `ifFieldMissing`, `ifFieldEquals` |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +**Batch transform:** |
| 66 | +- `batch()` via `BatchTransform` |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Composition methods** (`seq`, `seqAll`, `choice`) aggregate field operations from their children. If all children are field-aware, the composed rule is also a `FieldAwareRule`. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +**Non-field-aware** (traversal/structural): `all`, `one`, `everywhere`, `bottomUp`, `topDown`, `dynamicTransform` — these do not carry field-level metadata. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +## The FieldOperation Record |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +`FieldOperation` is a record with four components: |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +| Component | Type | Description | |
| 77 | +|-------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| |
| 78 | +| `operationType` | `FieldOperationType` | The kind of field operation (RENAME, REMOVE, etc.) | |
| 79 | +| `fieldPath` | `List<String>` | Path segments to the affected field | |
| 80 | +| `targetFieldName` | `String` (nullable) | Target field name for operations that have one | |
| 81 | +| `description` | `String` (nullable) | Optional human-readable description | |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +### Factory Methods |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +```java |
| 86 | +FieldOperation.rename("old", "new") // RENAME, ["old"], target="new" |
| 87 | +FieldOperation.remove("field") // REMOVE, ["field"] |
| 88 | +FieldOperation.add("field") // ADD, ["field"] |
| 89 | +FieldOperation.transform("field") // TRANSFORM, ["field"] |
| 90 | +FieldOperation.set("field") // SET, ["field"] |
| 91 | +FieldOperation.move("a.b", "c.d") // MOVE, ["a","b"], target="c.d" |
| 92 | +FieldOperation.copy("a.b", "c.d") // COPY, ["a","b"], target="c.d" |
| 93 | +FieldOperation.renamePath("pos.x", "posX") // RENAME, ["pos","x"], target="posX" |
| 94 | +FieldOperation.group("pos", "x", "y", "z") // GROUP, ["x","y","z"], target="pos" |
| 95 | +FieldOperation.flatten("position") // FLATTEN, ["position"] |
| 96 | +FieldOperation.conditional("field", "exists") // CONDITIONAL, ["field"], desc="exists" |
| 97 | +``` |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +### Convenience Methods |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +| Method | Return Type | Description | |
| 102 | +|------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------| |
| 103 | +| `fieldPathString()` | `String` | Dot-notation path (e.g., `"position.x"`) | |
| 104 | +| `isNested()` | `boolean` | `true` if field path has more than one segment | |
| 105 | +| `toSummary()` | `String` | Human-readable summary (e.g., `"RENAME(old -> new)"`) | |
| 106 | +| `targetFieldNameOpt()` | `Optional<String>` | Target field name as Optional | |
| 107 | +| `descriptionOpt()` | `Optional<String>` | Description as Optional | |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +## The FieldOperationType Enum |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +Ten operation types classify what a rule does to a field: |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +| Constant | Display Name | Requires Target | Structural | |
| 114 | +|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------|------------| |
| 115 | +| `RENAME` | `"rename"` | Yes | No | |
| 116 | +| `REMOVE` | `"remove"` | No | No | |
| 117 | +| `ADD` | `"add"` | No | No | |
| 118 | +| `TRANSFORM` | `"transform"` | No | No | |
| 119 | +| `SET` | `"set"` | No | No | |
| 120 | +| `MOVE` | `"move"` | Yes | Yes | |
| 121 | +| `COPY` | `"copy"` | Yes | Yes | |
| 122 | +| `GROUP` | `"group"` | Yes | Yes | |
| 123 | +| `FLATTEN` | `"flatten"` | No | Yes | |
| 124 | +| `CONDITIONAL` | `"conditional"` | No | No | |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +### Methods |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +| Method | Return Type | Description | |
| 129 | +|--------------------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------| |
| 130 | +| `displayName()` | `String` | Lowercase name (`"rename"`, `"remove"`, etc.) | |
| 131 | +| `requiresTarget()` | `boolean` | `true` for RENAME, MOVE, COPY, GROUP | |
| 132 | +| `isStructural()` | `boolean` | `true` for MOVE, COPY, GROUP, FLATTEN | |
| 133 | +| `toString()` | `String` | Returns `displayName()` | |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +## The FieldAwareRule Interface |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +Any rule can be checked for field-level metadata at runtime: |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +```java |
| 140 | +if (rule instanceof FieldAwareRule fieldAware) { |
| 141 | + List<FieldOperation> ops = fieldAware.fieldOperations(); |
| 142 | + // inspect field operations |
| 143 | +} |
| 144 | +``` |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +Custom rules can implement `FieldAwareRule` to participate in field-level diagnostics: |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +```java |
| 149 | +public class MyCustomRule implements TypeRewriteRule, FieldAwareRule { |
| 150 | + @Override |
| 151 | + public Optional<Typed<?>> rewrite(Type<?> type, Typed<?> input) { |
| 152 | + // rule logic |
| 153 | + } |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | + @Override |
| 156 | + public List<FieldOperation> fieldOperations() { |
| 157 | + return List.of(FieldOperation.transform("myField")); |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | +} |
| 160 | +``` |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +## Composition Aggregation |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +Composition methods aggregate field operations from their children: |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +```java |
| 167 | +TypeRewriteRule composed = Rules.seq( |
| 168 | + Rules.renameField(ops, "old", "new"), // 1 RENAME |
| 169 | + Rules.addField(ops, "score", defaultVal) // 1 ADD |
| 170 | +); |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +// composed instanceof FieldAwareRule → true |
| 173 | +// fieldOperations() contains 2 entries: RENAME + ADD |
| 174 | +``` |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +The same aggregation applies to `seqAll()`, `choice()`, and `batch()`. |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +If **all** children are non-field-aware (e.g., all are `dynamicTransform` rules), the composition is **not** a `FieldAwareRule`. |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +## Aggregation in Reports |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +### Per-Rule |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +```java |
| 185 | +for (RuleApplication rule : fix.ruleApplications()) { |
| 186 | + if (rule.hasFieldOperations()) { |
| 187 | + for (FieldOperation op : rule.fieldOperations()) { |
| 188 | + System.out.println(op.toSummary()); |
| 189 | + } |
| 190 | + } |
| 191 | +} |
| 192 | +``` |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +### Per-Fix |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +```java |
| 197 | +List<FieldOperation> allOps = fix.allFieldOperations(); |
| 198 | +int count = fix.fieldOperationCount(); |
| 199 | +``` |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +### Per-Migration |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +```java |
| 204 | +int totalOps = report.totalFieldOperationCount(); |
| 205 | +``` |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +### Filtering by Type |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +```java |
| 210 | +List<FieldOperation> renames = rule.fieldOperationsOfType(FieldOperationType.RENAME); |
| 211 | +``` |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +## Complete Example |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +```java |
| 216 | +import de.splatgames.aether.datafixers.api.diagnostic.*; |
| 217 | +import de.splatgames.aether.datafixers.api.rewrite.*; |
| 218 | +import de.splatgames.aether.datafixers.core.fix.SchemaDataFix; |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +public class PlayerV1ToV2Fix extends SchemaDataFix { |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | + public PlayerV1ToV2Fix(Schema inputSchema, Schema outputSchema) { |
| 223 | + super("PlayerV1ToV2", inputSchema, outputSchema); |
| 224 | + } |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | + @Override |
| 227 | + protected TypeRewriteRule makeRule(Schema inputSchema, Schema outputSchema) { |
| 228 | + return Rules.seq( |
| 229 | + Rules.renameField(ops(), "playerName", "name"), |
| 230 | + Rules.removeField(ops(), "legacyId"), |
| 231 | + Rules.addField(ops(), "score", ops().createInt(0)), |
| 232 | + Rules.transformField(ops(), "health", value -> |
| 233 | + ops().createFloat(Math.max(0f, ops().getFloat(value)))) |
| 234 | + ); |
| 235 | + } |
| 236 | +} |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +// --- Using the fix with diagnostics --- |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +DiagnosticContext context = DiagnosticContext.create( |
| 241 | + DiagnosticOptions.builder() |
| 242 | + .captureRuleDetails(true) |
| 243 | + .captureFieldDetails(true) |
| 244 | + .build() |
| 245 | +); |
| 246 | + |
| 247 | +Dynamic<JsonElement> result = fixer.update( |
| 248 | + TypeReferences.PLAYER, inputData, |
| 249 | + new DataVersion(1), new DataVersion(2), |
| 250 | + context |
| 251 | +); |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +MigrationReport report = context.getReport(); |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | +for (FixExecution fix : report.fixExecutions()) { |
| 256 | + System.out.println(fix.fixName() + ": " + fix.fieldOperationCount() + " field ops"); |
| 257 | + |
| 258 | + for (RuleApplication rule : fix.ruleApplications()) { |
| 259 | + if (rule.hasFieldOperations()) { |
| 260 | + for (FieldOperation op : rule.fieldOperations()) { |
| 261 | + System.out.println(" " + op.toSummary()); |
| 262 | + } |
| 263 | + } |
| 264 | + } |
| 265 | +} |
| 266 | + |
| 267 | +// Output: |
| 268 | +// PlayerV1ToV2: 4 field ops |
| 269 | +// RENAME(playerName -> name) |
| 270 | +// REMOVE(legacyId) |
| 271 | +// ADD(score) |
| 272 | +// TRANSFORM(health) |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | +System.out.println("Total field operations: " + report.totalFieldOperationCount()); |
| 275 | +``` |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | +## Performance Considerations |
| 278 | + |
| 279 | +- **Field metadata is collected at rule construction time** — there is zero runtime cost for the metadata itself |
| 280 | +- `captureFieldDetails(false)` skips the `instanceof` check and list copy in `DiagnosticRuleWrapper` |
| 281 | +- `captureRuleDetails` must also be `true` for field details to have any effect |
| 282 | +- For production, consider `DiagnosticOptions.minimal()` which disables both rule details and field details |
| 283 | + |
| 284 | +```java |
| 285 | +// Development/debugging — full field-level diagnostics |
| 286 | +DiagnosticContext devContext = DiagnosticContext.create(DiagnosticOptions.defaults()); |
| 287 | + |
| 288 | +// Production — timing only, no field details |
| 289 | +DiagnosticContext prodContext = DiagnosticContext.create(DiagnosticOptions.minimal()); |
| 290 | + |
| 291 | +// Best: No context for maximum performance |
| 292 | +fixer.update(type, data, from, to); // No context = no overhead |
| 293 | +``` |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | +## API Reference |
| 296 | + |
| 297 | +### FieldOperation |
| 298 | + |
| 299 | +| Method / Component | Type | Description | |
| 300 | +|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| |
| 301 | +| `operationType()` | `FieldOperationType` | The kind of field operation | |
| 302 | +| `fieldPath()` | `List<String>` | Path segments to the affected field | |
| 303 | +| `targetFieldName()` | `String` (nullable) | Target field name (rename target, destination) | |
| 304 | +| `description()` | `String` (nullable) | Optional human-readable description | |
| 305 | +| `fieldPathString()` | `String` | Dot-notation path string | |
| 306 | +| `isNested()` | `boolean` | Whether path has more than one segment | |
| 307 | +| `targetFieldNameOpt()` | `Optional<String>` | Target as Optional | |
| 308 | +| `descriptionOpt()` | `Optional<String>` | Description as Optional | |
| 309 | +| `toSummary()` | `String` | Human-readable summary | |
| 310 | + |
| 311 | +### FieldOperationType |
| 312 | + |
| 313 | +| Constant | `displayName()` | `requiresTarget()` | `isStructural()` | |
| 314 | +|----------------|------------------|----------------------|--------------------| |
| 315 | +| `RENAME` | `"rename"` | `true` | `false` | |
| 316 | +| `REMOVE` | `"remove"` | `false` | `false` | |
| 317 | +| `ADD` | `"add"` | `false` | `false` | |
| 318 | +| `TRANSFORM` | `"transform"` | `false` | `false` | |
| 319 | +| `SET` | `"set"` | `false` | `false` | |
| 320 | +| `MOVE` | `"move"` | `true` | `true` | |
| 321 | +| `COPY` | `"copy"` | `true` | `true` | |
| 322 | +| `GROUP` | `"group"` | `true` | `true` | |
| 323 | +| `FLATTEN` | `"flatten"` | `false` | `true` | |
| 324 | +| `CONDITIONAL` | `"conditional"` | `false` | `false` | |
| 325 | + |
| 326 | +### FieldAwareRule |
| 327 | + |
| 328 | +| Method | Return Type | Description | |
| 329 | +|---------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------| |
| 330 | +| `fieldOperations()` | `List<FieldOperation>` | Field-level operations metadata | |
| 331 | + |
| 332 | +## Related |
| 333 | + |
| 334 | +- [Use Diagnostics](use-diagnostics.md) |
| 335 | +- [Compose Fixes](compose-fixes.md) |
| 336 | +- [Batch Operations](batch-operations.md) |
| 337 | +- [Conditional Rules](conditional-rules.md) |
0 commit comments