You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: app/views/design-histories/v2.html
+18-11Lines changed: 18 additions & 11 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
30
30
<divclass="nhsuk-grid-row">
31
31
<divclass="nhsuk-grid-column-two-thirds">
32
32
33
-
<h1>Onboarding flow and homepage iterations</h1>
33
+
<h1>Onboarding flow and evaluation upload</h1>
34
34
35
35
<pclass="nhsuk-body-l">We explored how we could accommodate submitting evaluations to the platform, in user friendly formats</p>
36
36
@@ -41,10 +41,13 @@ <h1>Onboarding flow and homepage iterations</h1>
41
41
<h2>The problem</h2>
42
42
43
43
44
-
<p>We initially explored a simple flow which would enable procurement professionals to submit their own evaluations. This would potentially save time
44
+
<p>We initially explored a simple flow with a basic upload function which would enable procurement professionals to submit their own evaluations. This would potentially save time
45
45
for trusts looking to share their experiences with products, and help populate the platform with more peer-to-peer intelligence.</p>
<p><strong>Potential needs met:</strong> Trusts with existing evaluation processes who want to share findings and access others' work without restructuring their current approach</p>
@@ -87,15 +91,18 @@ <h4>Discussion topics help peer matching</h4>
87
91
<p>If users consent to contact, we ask what topics they're comfortable discussing (implementation, clinical outcomes, supplier experience). This helps other trusts identify the right person to contact for their specific questions.</p>
88
92
89
93
<h4>Multi-product evaluations supported</h4>
90
-
<p>Recognising that trusts often evaluate multiple products in comparative assessments, we designed Route A to handle one document linked to multiple product evaluations—avoiding the need to upload the same PDF repeatedly.</p>
91
-
94
+
<p>Recognising that trusts often evaluate multiple products in comparative assessments,from user research findings, we designed another iteration which allows handling of one document linked to multiple product evaluations—avoiding the need to upload the same PDF repeatedly.</p>
92
95
96
+
<figureclass="nhsuk-image">
97
+
<imgsrc="/images/dh-3-doc-upload-multiple.png" alt="image of the second iteration of the document upload flow, which supports multiple products per document"><figcaptionclass="nhsuk-image__caption">Multi-product document upload page</figcaption></figure><h2>How it looks now</h2><p>We iterated on the design to better meet user needs and feedback, while still aligning with our core principles of simplicity and ease of use.</p>
98
+
<figcaptionclass="nhsuk-image__caption"> Another iteration of the document upload page for multiple product support</figcaption>
99
+
</figure>
93
100
94
101
95
102
96
-
<h2>How it tested</h2>
103
+
<h2class="nhsuk-heading-l">How it tested</h2>
97
104
98
-
<h3>Selected user research insights</h3>
105
+
99
106
100
107
<ulclass="nhsuk-list nhsuk-list--bullet">
101
108
<li>Users recognised the need to share multiple products and the importance of providing context around their evaluations (for example, department and scale information).</li>
0 commit comments