You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: _posts/2025-01-27-matching_molecular_series.md
+6-9Lines changed: 6 additions & 9 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -254,9 +254,9 @@ To do that, we group by core+assay (for both reference and query) and count the
254
254
In that same step, we also compute the cRMSD (a metric proposed by [Ehmki and Kramer](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00709) to track the similarity between the two series) between the potency vectors of the reference and query series.
255
255
It's computed as follows and provides an indication of how well trends align between the two series:
We also track fragments in common and the potencies in both assay sets, here by casting them to a string and joining them with a pipe character.
262
262
Finally, we left join the reference and query datasets again on their fragment smiles, but select only those where the query fragment is missing: this set of un-matched fragments will contain - among other things - our new R-groups
@@ -334,14 +334,11 @@ The optimisations provided by the polars library makes this entire process prett
0 commit comments