From 3dab005e85006bca0f49cca66a8ed87ec44dadce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduardo Fraga Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 20:07:32 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] chore(plan): complete Implementation (Writing & Translating) for rfc-10008-blog-post Co-Authored-By: AI Context Agent --- .context/docs/README.md | 4 + .context/plans/README.md | 1 + .context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md | 147 ++++++++++++++++++ .context/workflow/actions.jsonl | 7 + .../status.yaml | 63 ++++++++ .../plans-2026-07-09T23-05-55-728Z/plans.json | 14 ++ .context/workflow/plans.json | 12 +- .context/workflow/status.yaml | 66 +++----- 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md create mode 100644 .context/workflow/archive/blog-image-support-2026-07-09T23-05-55-727Z/status.yaml create mode 100644 .context/workflow/archive/plans-2026-07-09T23-05-55-728Z/plans.json diff --git a/.context/docs/README.md b/.context/docs/README.md index b5dfd64..e73bc93 100644 --- a/.context/docs/README.md +++ b/.context/docs/README.md @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Welcome to the repository knowledge base. Start with the project overview, then **Blog Posts Reference** The following blog posts have been added to the documentation index: +- [Understanding RFC 10008: The HTTP QUERY Method](../../content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md) (en) — Standardizing HTTP QUERY as a safe and idempotent method with a body payload +- [Entendendo a RFC 10008: O Método HTTP QUERY](../../content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md) (pt-br) — Padronizando o método HTTP QUERY como uma alternativa segura e idempotente com payload no corpo - [Google SRE Principles: Evolution from Traditional Operations to Site Reliability Engineering](../../content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md) (en) — Comprehensive overview of Google SRE principles from the SRE Book - [Princípios SRE do Google: Evolução da Operações Tradicionais para a Engenharia de Confiabilidade de Sites](../../content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md) (pt-br) — Visão geral abrangente dos princípios SRE do Google, do Livro SRE @@ -45,6 +47,8 @@ The following blog posts have been added to the documentation index: | Tooling & Productivity Guide | `tooling.md` | CLI scripts, IDE configs, automation workflows | ## Recent Blog Posts +- [Understanding RFC 10008: The HTTP QUERY Method](../../content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md) (en) — Standardizing HTTP QUERY as a safe and idempotent method with a body payload +- [Entendendo a RFC 10008: O Método HTTP QUERY](../../content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md) (pt-br) — Padronizando o método HTTP QUERY como uma alternativa segura e idempotente com payload no corpo - [Understanding Site Reliability Engineering: Google's SRE Philosophy and Practices](../../content/en/blog/understanding-sre-google-sre-philosophy-practices.md) (en) — Deep dive into Google SRE principles: error budgets, progressive rollouts, and the engineering-first culture - [Supabase agora é um app oficial do ChatGPT](../../content/pt-br/blog/supabase-chatgpt-app.md) (pt-br) — Supabase becomes official ChatGPT app with 29 integrated tools - [Supabase Is Now an Official ChatGPT App](../../content/en/blog/supabase-chatgpt-app.md) (en) — English version of the same announcement diff --git a/.context/plans/README.md b/.context/plans/README.md index 4092f48..364f97a 100644 --- a/.context/plans/README.md +++ b/.context/plans/README.md @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ This directory contains plans for coordinating work across documentation and pla 2. [Blog Hermes K8s Install](./blog-hermes-k8s-install.md) 3. [Blog Image Support](./blog-image-support.md) 4. [Oracle Always Free Post](./oracle-always-free-post.md) +5. [Rfc 10008 Blog Post](./rfc-10008-blog-post.md) ## How To Create Or Update Plans - Run "ai-context plan " to scaffold a new plan template. diff --git a/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md b/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7bb0a83 --- /dev/null +++ b/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +--- +status: active +generated: 2026-07-09 +agents: + - type: "documentation-writer" + role: "Create clear, comprehensive documentation (blog posts in EN and PT)" + - type: "code-reviewer" + role: "Review code changes, translations, and verify Hugo build results" +docs: + - "project-overview.md" +phases: + - id: "phase-1" + name: "Planning & Content Outline" + prevc: "P" + agent: "documentation-writer" + - id: "phase-2" + name: "Implementation (Writing & Translating)" + prevc: "E" + agent: "documentation-writer" + - id: "phase-3" + name: "Validation & PR Verification" + prevc: "V" + agent: "code-reviewer" +--- + +# Create HTTP QUERY Method Blog Post Plan + +> Write a blog post in English and Portuguese about RFC 10008 (The HTTP QUERY Method), create a PR, verify build, and merge. + +## Task Snapshot +- **Primary goal:** Create a high-quality, technically accurate blog post about RFC 10008 (The HTTP QUERY Method) in English and Portuguese, publish them to the Hugo-based static site, verify the local build, submit a Pull Request, and merge it upon successful validation checks. +- **Success signal:** Both English and Portuguese blog posts are created with correct markdown structure, appropriate Hugo front matter, valid internal and external links, and the project builds successfully with `hugo --gc --minify`. +- **Key references:** + - [RFC 10008 (HTTP QUERY Method) Page](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10008/) + - [Documentation Index](../docs/README.md) + - [Agent Handbook](../agents/README.md) + - [Plans Index](./README.md) + +## Codebase Context +- **Total files analyzed:** 44 +- **Total symbols discovered:** 147 +- **Architecture layers:** Content (Hugo Blog) + +## Agent Lineup +| Agent | Role in this plan | Playbook | First responsibility focus | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Documentation Writer | Authors the blog posts in both English and Portuguese, structures content following existing blog styles, and references source links. | [Documentation Writer](../agents/documentation-writer.md) | Create clear, comprehensive blog posts in EN and PT | +| Code Reviewer | Performs code review, verifies layout styling, internal link trailing slashes, and Hugo build correctness. | [Code Reviewer](../agents/code-reviewer.md) | Verify layout, links, and run `hugo --gc --minify` | + +## Documentation Touchpoints +| Guide | File | Primary Inputs | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Project Overview | [project-overview.md](../docs/project-overview.md) | Add reference to RFC 10008 blog post | + +## Risk Assessment + +### Identified Risks +| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy | Owner (Agent) | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Formatting error or Hugo build failure | Low | High | Run local Hugo verification (`hugo --gc --minify`) | `code-reviewer` | +| Broken links (external/internal) | Low | High | Use trailing slashes on all internal links, verify URLs are correct | `documentation-writer` | + +### Dependencies +- **Internal:** blowfish theme layout consistency +- **External:** RFC Editor website availability (fetched during research) + +### Assumptions +- Blog posts should follow the Hugo markdown layout of existing blog posts (e.g. `content/en/blog/grafana-13-1.md`). +- Date of publication set to `2026-07-09`. + +## Working Phases + +### Phase 1 — Planning & Content Outline +> **Primary Agent:** `documentation-writer` - [Playbook](../agents/documentation-writer.md) + +**Objective:** Map out the structure of the blog post and verify dependencies/references. + +**Tasks** + +| # | Task | Agent | Status | Deliverable | +|---|------|-------|--------|-------------| +| 1.1 | Analyze the parsed RFC 10008 content to draft outline | `documentation-writer` | completed | Content outline for EN and PT posts | +| 1.2 | Setup the localized file structure | `documentation-writer` | completed | Verified directories for content files | + +**Commit Checkpoint** +- `git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase 1 planning"` + +--- + +### Phase 2 — Implementation (Writing & Translating) +> **Primary Agent:** `documentation-writer` - [Playbook](../agents/documentation-writer.md) + +**Objective:** Write the English and Portuguese versions of the blog post with correct front matter, content, examples, and source links. + +**Tasks** + +| # | Task | Agent | Status | Deliverable | +|---|------|-------|--------|-------------| +| 2.1 | Write the English blog post under `content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md` | `documentation-writer` | pending | Fully written English post | +| 2.2 | Write the Portuguese blog post under `content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md` | `documentation-writer` | pending | Fully written Portuguese post | + +**Commit Checkpoint** +- `git commit -m "feat(blog): add RFC 10008 HTTP QUERY blog posts in EN and PT"` + +--- + +### Phase 3 — Validation & Handoff +> **Primary Agent:** `code-reviewer` - [Playbook](../agents/code-reviewer.md) + +**Objective:** Verify that the blog post passes Hugo build without warnings or errors and links are formatted with trailing slashes. + +**Tasks** + +| # | Task | Agent | Status | Deliverable | +|---|------|-------|--------|-------------| +| 3.1 | Run `hugo --gc --minify` to verify build succeeds | `code-reviewer` | pending | Valid build output with zero errors | +| 3.2 | Verify trailing slashes for internal links | `code-reviewer` | pending | Code check of the markdown files | +| 3.3 | Submit a Pull Request and verify PR status | `code-reviewer` | pending | Git branch and GitHub PR created/checked | + +**Commit Checkpoint** +- `git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase 3 validation and verification"` + +## Rollback Plan + +### Rollback Triggers +- Hugo build failures in CI/CD pipeline +- Broken links or design inconsistency reported by automated tools + +### Rollback Procedures +- Delete or move the draft posts to draft state (`draft: true`) +- Revert the git commit of the added content + +## Evidence & Follow-up + +### Artifacts to Collect +- Content of `content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md` +- Content of `content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md` +- Local Hugo build log + +### Success Metrics +- Hugo site builds successfully in < 1 minute +- Trailing slashes on all internal links are verified + +### Follow-up Actions +| Action | Owner (Agent) | Due | +|--------|---------------|-----| +| Cross-link new post in docs index | `documentation-writer` | Immediately | diff --git a/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl b/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl index 15eb395..2de0264 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl +++ b/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl @@ -94,3 +94,10 @@ {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T22:37:09.665Z","tool":"workflow-status","action":"workflow-status","status":"success","details":{"params":{},"result":{"success":true,"currentPhase":{"code":"V","name":"Validation"},"scale":"Medium"}}} {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T22:37:21.486Z","tool":"agent","action":"orchestrate","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"orchestrate","phase":"V"},"result":{"count":4}}} {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z","tool":"workflow-advance","action":"workflow-advance","status":"success","details":{"params":{"outputs":["/Users/eduardo/git/github/eftechcombr/www/content/en/blog/understanding-sre-google-sre-philosophy-practices.md"]},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Workflow completed!"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:05:32.708Z","tool":"context","action":"check","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"check","repoPath":"/Users/eduardo/git/github/eftechcombr/www"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:05:34.632Z","tool":"workflow-status","action":"workflow-status","status":"success","details":{"params":{},"result":{"success":true,"currentPhase":{"code":"V","name":"Validation"},"scale":"Medium"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:05:55.741Z","tool":"workflow-init","action":"workflow-init","status":"success","details":{"params":{"name":"rfc-10008-blog-post","description":"Create a blog post in English and Portuguese about RFC 10008 (HTTP QUERY Method), create a Pull Request, wait for status checks, and merge.","scale":"SMALL","archive_previous":true},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Workflow initialized: rfc-10008-blog-post","currentPhase":"P","scale":"Small"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:05:59.404Z","tool":"context","action":"scaffoldPlan","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"scaffoldPlan","autoFill":true,"planName":"rfc-10008-blog-post","title":"Create HTTP QUERY Method Blog Post","summary":"Write a blog post in English and Portuguese about RFC 10008 (The HTTP QUERY Method), create a PR, verify build, and merge."},"result":{"success":true,"status":"incomplete"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:02.305Z","tool":"context","action":"fillSingle","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"fillSingle","filePath":"/Users/eduardo/git/github/eftechcombr/www/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md"},"result":{"success":true}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:26.910Z","tool":"plan","action":"link","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"link","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post"},"result":{"success":true}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:29.891Z","tool":"workflow-advance","action":"workflow-advance","status":"success","details":{"params":{"outputs":[".context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md"]},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Advanced to Execution phase","nextPhase":{"code":"E","name":"Execution"}}}} diff --git a/.context/workflow/archive/blog-image-support-2026-07-09T23-05-55-727Z/status.yaml b/.context/workflow/archive/blog-image-support-2026-07-09T23-05-55-727Z/status.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..96682cd --- /dev/null +++ b/.context/workflow/archive/blog-image-support-2026-07-09T23-05-55-727Z/status.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +project: + name: "blog-image-support" + scale: MEDIUM + started: "2026-06-22T12:48:51.374Z" + current_phase: V + +phases: + P: + status: completed + started_at: "2026-06-22T12:48:51.374Z" + completed_at: "2026-06-22T12:49:27.759Z" + R: + status: completed + started_at: "2026-06-22T12:49:27.760Z" + completed_at: "2026-06-22T12:51:32.159Z" + E: + status: completed + started_at: "2026-06-22T12:51:32.159Z" + completed_at: "2026-06-22T12:52:40.162Z" + V: + status: filled + started_at: "2026-06-22T12:52:40.163Z" + completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z" + outputs: + - path: "/Users/eduardo/git/github/eftechcombr/www/content/en/blog/understanding-sre-google-sre-philosophy-practices.md" + status: filled + C: + status: skipped + reason: "Not required for scale MEDIUM" + +agents: + test-writer: + status: completed + completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:51.259Z" + outputs: ["content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md", "content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md"] + code-reviewer: + status: completed + started_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:51.260Z" + completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:55.585Z" + outputs: ["content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md", "content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md"] + security-auditor: + status: completed + started_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:55.586Z" + completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:44:44.228Z" + outputs: ["content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md", "content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md", ".context/docs/README.md"] + performance-optimizer: + status: in_progress + started_at: "2026-07-09T22:44:44.229Z" + +execution: + history: + - timestamp: "2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z" + phase: V + action: completed + last_activity: "2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z" + resume_context: "Fase V (Validação) concluída" + +approval: + plan_created: true + plan_approved: true + approved_by: "solo-dev" + approved_at: "2026-06-22T12:51:29.780Z" + diff --git a/.context/workflow/archive/plans-2026-07-09T23-05-55-728Z/plans.json b/.context/workflow/archive/plans-2026-07-09T23-05-55-728Z/plans.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c46132 --- /dev/null +++ b/.context/workflow/archive/plans-2026-07-09T23-05-55-728Z/plans.json @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +{ + "active": [ + { + "slug": "blog-image-support", + "path": "plans/blog-image-support.md", + "title": "Suporte a imagens nos posts do blog", + "summary": "Adicionar suporte completo a imagens nos posts do blog usando o tema Blowfish: featured images, hero images, imagens inline com processamento responsivo, e estrutura de diretórios padronizada", + "linkedAt": "2026-06-22T12:49:24.975Z", + "status": "active" + } + ], + "completed": [], + "primary": "blog-image-support" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.context/workflow/plans.json b/.context/workflow/plans.json index 1c46132..811eff6 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/plans.json +++ b/.context/workflow/plans.json @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ { "active": [ { - "slug": "blog-image-support", - "path": "plans/blog-image-support.md", - "title": "Suporte a imagens nos posts do blog", - "summary": "Adicionar suporte completo a imagens nos posts do blog usando o tema Blowfish: featured images, hero images, imagens inline com processamento responsivo, e estrutura de diretórios padronizada", - "linkedAt": "2026-06-22T12:49:24.975Z", + "slug": "rfc-10008-blog-post", + "path": "plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md", + "title": "Create HTTP QUERY Method Blog Post", + "summary": "Write a blog post in English and Portuguese about RFC 10008 (The HTTP QUERY Method), create a PR, verify build, and merge.", + "linkedAt": "2026-07-09T23:06:26.908Z", "status": "active" } ], "completed": [], - "primary": "blog-image-support" + "primary": "rfc-10008-blog-post" } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.context/workflow/status.yaml b/.context/workflow/status.yaml index 96682cd..a544696 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/status.yaml +++ b/.context/workflow/status.yaml @@ -1,63 +1,35 @@ project: - name: "blog-image-support" - scale: MEDIUM - started: "2026-06-22T12:48:51.374Z" - current_phase: V + name: "rfc-10008-blog-post" + scale: SMALL + started: "2026-07-09T23:05:55.729Z" + current_phase: E phases: P: - status: completed - started_at: "2026-06-22T12:48:51.374Z" - completed_at: "2026-06-22T12:49:27.759Z" + status: filled + started_at: "2026-07-09T23:05:55.729Z" + completed_at: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.889Z" R: - status: completed - started_at: "2026-06-22T12:49:27.760Z" - completed_at: "2026-06-22T12:51:32.159Z" + status: skipped + reason: "Not required for scale SMALL" E: - status: completed - started_at: "2026-06-22T12:51:32.159Z" - completed_at: "2026-06-22T12:52:40.162Z" + status: in_progress + started_at: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.890Z" V: - status: filled - started_at: "2026-06-22T12:52:40.163Z" - completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z" - outputs: - - path: "/Users/eduardo/git/github/eftechcombr/www/content/en/blog/understanding-sre-google-sre-philosophy-practices.md" - status: filled + status: pending C: status: skipped - reason: "Not required for scale MEDIUM" - -agents: - test-writer: - status: completed - completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:51.259Z" - outputs: ["content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md", "content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md"] - code-reviewer: - status: completed - started_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:51.260Z" - completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:55.585Z" - outputs: ["content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md", "content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md"] - security-auditor: - status: completed - started_at: "2026-07-09T22:43:55.586Z" - completed_at: "2026-07-09T22:44:44.228Z" - outputs: ["content/en/blog/google-sre-principles.md", "content/pt-br/blog/google-sre-principles.md", ".context/docs/README.md"] - performance-optimizer: - status: in_progress - started_at: "2026-07-09T22:44:44.229Z" + reason: "Not required for scale SMALL" execution: history: - - timestamp: "2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z" - phase: V - action: completed - last_activity: "2026-07-09T22:38:10.055Z" - resume_context: "Fase V (Validação) concluída" + - timestamp: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.890Z" + phase: E + action: started + last_activity: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.890Z" + resume_context: "Fase E (Execução) em progresso" approval: plan_created: true - plan_approved: true - approved_by: "solo-dev" - approved_at: "2026-06-22T12:51:29.780Z" + plan_approved: false From 42f19d6aee4a7163c72be63bda8ae1723e33dad4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduardo Fraga Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 20:07:35 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] chore(plan): complete Implementation (Writing & Translating) for rfc-10008-blog-post Co-Authored-By: AI Context Agent --- .context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md | 15 ++++++++++++ .context/workflow/actions.jsonl | 1 + .../plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ .context/workflow/status.yaml | 14 +++++++---- 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json diff --git a/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md b/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md index 7bb0a83..032ef03 100644 --- a/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md +++ b/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ --- status: active +progress: 100 generated: 2026-07-09 agents: - type: "documentation-writer" @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ phases: name: "Validation & PR Verification" prevc: "V" agent: "code-reviewer" +lastUpdated: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" --- # Create HTTP QUERY Method Blog Post Plan @@ -130,6 +132,19 @@ phases: - Delete or move the draft posts to draft state (`draft: true`) - Revert the git commit of the added content +## Execution History + +> Last updated: 2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z | Progress: 100% + +### phase-2 [DONE] +- Started: 2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z +- Completed: 2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z + +- [x] Step 1: Step 1 *(2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z)* + - Output: content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md + - Notes: Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC. + + ## Evidence & Follow-up ### Artifacts to Collect diff --git a/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl b/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl index 2de0264..4d4d0ef 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl +++ b/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl @@ -101,3 +101,4 @@ {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:02.305Z","tool":"context","action":"fillSingle","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"fillSingle","filePath":"/Users/eduardo/git/github/eftechcombr/www/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md"},"result":{"success":true}}} {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:26.910Z","tool":"plan","action":"link","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"link","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post"},"result":{"success":true}}} {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:29.891Z","tool":"workflow-advance","action":"workflow-advance","status":"success","details":{"params":{"outputs":[".context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md"]},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Advanced to Execution phase","nextPhase":{"code":"E","name":"Execution"}}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:07:32.389Z","tool":"plan","action":"updateStep","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"updateStep","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post","phaseId":"phase-2","status":"completed","stepIndex":1,"output":"content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md","notes":"Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC."},"result":{"success":true,"planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post","status":"completed"}}} diff --git a/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json b/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b6dcb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +{ + "planSlug": "rfc-10008-blog-post", + "progress": 100, + "phases": { + "phase-2": { + "phaseId": "phase-2", + "status": "completed", + "startedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z", + "steps": [ + { + "stepIndex": 1, + "description": "Step 1", + "status": "completed", + "completedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z", + "output": "content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md", + "notes": "Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC." + } + ], + "completedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" + } + }, + "decisions": [], + "lastUpdated": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.context/workflow/status.yaml b/.context/workflow/status.yaml index a544696..8bd175f 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/status.yaml +++ b/.context/workflow/status.yaml @@ -23,11 +23,17 @@ phases: execution: history: - - timestamp: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.890Z" + - timestamp: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.388Z" phase: E - action: started - last_activity: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.890Z" - resume_context: "Fase E (Execução) em progresso" + action: step_completed + plan: "rfc-10008-blog-post" + planPhase: "phase-2" + stepIndex: 1 + stepDescription: "Step 1" + output: "content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md" + notes: "Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC." + last_activity: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.388Z" + resume_context: "Concluído: Step 1" approval: plan_created: true From 9975b14220bf178eac283f2e904ee9067fa121fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduardo Fraga Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 20:08:34 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] feat(content): add blog post about RFC 10008 HTTP QUERY method --- .context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md | 26 +-- .context/workflow/actions.jsonl | 3 + .../plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json | 12 +- .context/workflow/status.yaml | 24 ++- content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md | 158 ++++++++++++++++++ content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md | 158 ++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 345 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) create mode 100644 content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md create mode 100644 content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md diff --git a/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md b/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md index 032ef03..6603207 100644 --- a/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md +++ b/.context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ phases: name: "Validation & PR Verification" prevc: "V" agent: "code-reviewer" -lastUpdated: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" +lastUpdated: "2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z" --- # Create HTTP QUERY Method Blog Post Plan @@ -134,29 +134,15 @@ lastUpdated: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" ## Execution History -> Last updated: 2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z | Progress: 100% +> Last updated: 2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z | Progress: 100% ### phase-2 [DONE] - Started: 2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z -- Completed: 2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z +- Completed: 2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z - [x] Step 1: Step 1 *(2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z)* - Output: content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md - Notes: Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC. - - -## Evidence & Follow-up - -### Artifacts to Collect -- Content of `content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md` -- Content of `content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md` -- Local Hugo build log - -### Success Metrics -- Hugo site builds successfully in < 1 minute -- Trailing slashes on all internal links are verified - -### Follow-up Actions -| Action | Owner (Agent) | Due | -|--------|---------------|-----| -| Cross-link new post in docs index | `documentation-writer` | Immediately | +- [x] Step 2: Step 2 *(2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z)* + - Output: content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md + - Notes: Successfully authored the Portuguese version, keeping the exact structure, examples, and tone. diff --git a/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl b/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl index 4d4d0ef..c719b2d 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl +++ b/.context/workflow/actions.jsonl @@ -102,3 +102,6 @@ {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:26.910Z","tool":"plan","action":"link","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"link","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post"},"result":{"success":true}}} {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:06:29.891Z","tool":"workflow-advance","action":"workflow-advance","status":"success","details":{"params":{"outputs":[".context/plans/rfc-10008-blog-post.md"]},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Advanced to Execution phase","nextPhase":{"code":"E","name":"Execution"}}}} {"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:07:32.389Z","tool":"plan","action":"updateStep","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"updateStep","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post","phaseId":"phase-2","status":"completed","stepIndex":1,"output":"content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md","notes":"Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC."},"result":{"success":true,"planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post","status":"completed"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:07:35.598Z","tool":"plan","action":"updateStep","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"updateStep","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post","phaseId":"phase-2","status":"completed","stepIndex":2,"output":"content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md","notes":"Successfully authored the Portuguese version, keeping the exact structure, examples, and tone."},"result":{"success":true,"planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post","status":"completed"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:07:38.625Z","tool":"plan","action":"syncMarkdown","status":"success","details":{"params":{"action":"syncMarkdown","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post"},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Plan markdown synced successfully","planSlug":"rfc-10008-blog-post"}}} +{"timestamp":"2026-07-09T23:07:42.412Z","tool":"workflow-advance","action":"workflow-advance","status":"success","details":{"params":{"outputs":["content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md","content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md",".context/docs/README.md"]},"result":{"success":true,"message":"Advanced to Validation phase","nextPhase":{"code":"V","name":"Validation"}}}} diff --git a/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json b/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json index 6b6dcb8..d284c41 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json +++ b/.context/workflow/plan-tracking/rfc-10008-blog-post.json @@ -14,11 +14,19 @@ "completedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z", "output": "content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md", "notes": "Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC." + }, + { + "stepIndex": 2, + "description": "Step 2", + "status": "completed", + "completedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z", + "output": "content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md", + "notes": "Successfully authored the Portuguese version, keeping the exact structure, examples, and tone." } ], - "completedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" + "completedAt": "2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z" } }, "decisions": [], - "lastUpdated": "2026-07-09T23:07:32.227Z" + "lastUpdated": "2026-07-09T23:07:35.440Z" } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.context/workflow/status.yaml b/.context/workflow/status.yaml index 8bd175f..dc767b4 100644 --- a/.context/workflow/status.yaml +++ b/.context/workflow/status.yaml @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ project: name: "rfc-10008-blog-post" scale: SMALL started: "2026-07-09T23:05:55.729Z" - current_phase: E + current_phase: V phases: P: @@ -13,27 +13,23 @@ phases: status: skipped reason: "Not required for scale SMALL" E: - status: in_progress + status: filled started_at: "2026-07-09T23:06:29.890Z" + completed_at: "2026-07-09T23:07:42.410Z" V: - status: pending + status: in_progress + started_at: "2026-07-09T23:07:42.411Z" C: status: skipped reason: "Not required for scale SMALL" execution: history: - - timestamp: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.388Z" - phase: E - action: step_completed - plan: "rfc-10008-blog-post" - planPhase: "phase-2" - stepIndex: 1 - stepDescription: "Step 1" - output: "content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md" - notes: "Successfully authored the English blog post with Hugo front matter, examples, and technical insights from the RFC." - last_activity: "2026-07-09T23:07:32.388Z" - resume_context: "Concluído: Step 1" + - timestamp: "2026-07-09T23:07:42.411Z" + phase: V + action: started + last_activity: "2026-07-09T23:07:42.411Z" + resume_context: "Fase V (Validação) em progresso" approval: plan_created: true diff --git a/content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md b/content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e886d1e --- /dev/null +++ b/content/en/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +--- +title: "Understanding RFC 10008: The HTTP QUERY Method" +description: "A deep dive into RFC 10008, introducing the HTTP QUERY method as a safe, idempotent alternative for large-volume data retrieval." +summary: "RFC 10008 standardizes the HTTP QUERY method, filling the long-standing gap between GET and POST. It enables safe, idempotent requests that carry parameters in the request body, solving URI length limits while retaining caching and retry benefits." +date: 2026-07-09 +draft: false +tags: ["http", "rfc", "web-development", "api", "architecture"] +categories: ["architecture"] +--- + +The IETF has officially published **RFC 10008**, standardizing the **HTTP QUERY** request method. This specification defines a new, standardized way to execute safe and idempotent queries carrying complex or voluminous query parameters within the request body. + +For years, developers have struggled with the trade-offs of using `GET` versus `POST` for search and query endpoints. RFC 10008 fills this gap, offering a clean, idiomatic solution for modern API design. + +Here is a comprehensive breakdown of the HTTP QUERY method, why it matters, and how to use it. + +--- + +## The Core Problem: GET vs. POST + +Historically, web APIs had two primary options for retrieving data: + +1. **HTTP GET**: Excellent for retrieving resources because it is safe (does not change server state) and idempotent (can be repeated without side effects). However, `GET` parameters must be encoded in the URI. If a query has complex parameters (e.g., deep JSON filters, raw SQL, or long search terms), the URI can quickly exceed size limits (usually recommended to be at least 8000 octets, but limits vary across proxies and browsers). Furthermore, URIs are frequently logged in plain text, presenting a security risk for sensitive query data. +2. **HTTP POST**: Allows parameters to be sent in the request body, bypassing URI length limits and logging risks. However, `POST` is not semantically safe or idempotent by default. Caches, proxies, and web browsers cannot automatically retry failed `POST` requests, nor can they cache the results easily. + +### The QUERY Method Compromise + +The `QUERY` method acts as a bridge. Like `POST`, the input to the operation is passed in the request body (the query content) rather than in the URI. Like `GET`, the method is explicitly **safe** and **idempotent**, allowing features like caching and automatic retries to operate out-of-the-box. + +--- + +## Method Property Comparison + +The table below summaries how `QUERY` compares to `GET` and `POST` (adapted from the RFC specification): + +| Property | GET | QUERY | POST | +| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | +| **Safe** | Yes | Yes | Potentially No | +| **Idempotent** | Yes | Yes | Potentially No | +| **URI for Query Itself** | Yes (by definition) | Optional (`Location` header) | No | +| **URI for Query Result** | Optional (`Content-Location`) | Optional (`Content-Location`) | Optional (`Content-Location`) | +| **Cacheable** | Yes | Yes | Yes, but only for future GET/HEAD | +| **Request Body** | No defined semantics | Expected (per resource rules) | Expected (per resource rules) | + +--- + +## Examples in Action + +Let’s look at how a typical verbose query is transformed from `GET` or `POST` to the new `QUERY` method. + +### The old, verbose GET pattern: +If the parameters are too large, this is inefficient to parse, risks being truncated, and exposes data in server logs: + +```http +GET /feed?q=foo&limit=10&sort=-published&filter=highly-specific-nested-filter-content HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org +``` + +### The old POST workaround: +While safe from logging and truncation, intermediaries cannot assume this request is safe or idempotent: + +```http +POST /feed HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org +Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded + +q=foo&limit=10&sort=-published +``` + +### The new QUERY Method: +By sending a `QUERY` request, we get the best of both worlds: + +```http +QUERY /feed HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org +Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded +Accept: application/json + +q=foo&limit=10&sort=-published +``` + +#### Response: +```http +HTTP/1.1 200 OK +Content-Type: application/json + +[ + { "id": 1, "title": "First Match" }, + { "id": 2, "title": "Second Match" } +] +``` + +--- + +## Key Technical Features of RFC 10008 + +### 1. The `Accept-Query` Header Field +Servers can advertise their support for `QUERY` and the formats they accept using the `Accept-Query` response header. It uses the modern "Structured Fields" syntax: + +```http +Accept-Query: "application/jsonpath", application/sql;charset="UTF-8" +``` + +Clients can discover support through an `OPTIONS` request or by inspecting the `Allow` header in a `405 Method Not Allowed` response: + +```http +OPTIONS /contacts HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org + +--- Response --- +HTTP/1.1 200 OK +Allow: GET, QUERY, OPTIONS, HEAD +``` + +### 2. Caching & Caching Keys +Caching `QUERY` requests is inherently more complex than caching `GET` requests because the cache must compute a key using both the URI and the request body (the query content) along with relevant metadata. + +To optimize caching, caches are permitted to normalize minor, semantically insignificant differences in request bodies (such as stripping content encoding or JSON whitespace normalization) before generating the cache key. + +### 3. Redirection & Equivalent Resources +When executing a `QUERY`, the server can assign a URI to either the query definition itself or the specific query result. + +- **`Location` response field**: Indicates a URI representing the query itself. A client can perform a standard `GET` request on this URI to repeat the query without resending the heavy body payload. +- **`Content-Location` response field**: Points to a temporary resource containing the static result of the query just executed. + +For instance, the server might respond with: + +```http +HTTP/1.1 200 OK +Content-Type: application/json +Location: /contacts/stored-queries/42 +Content-Location: /contacts/stored-results/17 +``` + +Clients can subsequently execute a `GET /contacts/stored-queries/42` request to run the same query again. + +--- + +## Security Considerations + +RFC 10008 highlights several safety advantages and implementation requirements: + +- **Logging Avoidance**: Query parameters are enclosed in the body, mitigating the risk of exposing sensitive data (like user IDs or custom search terms) in plain-text server and proxy logs. +- **Temporary Resource URIs**: If a server assigns a URI to a query (using `Location` or `Content-Location`), it **must** ensure that the newly created URI itself does not contain sensitive parts of the original request body in plain text. +- **CORS Handling**: Browsers implementing Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) will trigger a "preflight" options request for `QUERY` because it is not in the CORS-safelisted method group. + +--- + +## Conclusion & Further Reading + +The standardization of the `QUERY` method represents a significant milestone in RESTful architecture. It cleans up the semantic abuse of `POST` for searching, resolves the size constraints and security leaks of `GET`, and opens up better optimization avenues for API servers and caches alike. + +As web frameworks and reverse proxies begin implementing native support for RFC 10008, developers should consider adopting `QUERY` for all search, filter, and reporting endpoints carrying non-trivial query payloads. + +To read the complete technical specification, check the official standard: +- [RFC 10008: The HTTP QUERY Method](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10008/) + +Are you looking to modernize your API architecture or improve observability across your systems? At EF-TECH, we help organizations design scalable, efficient, and robust software architectures. [Contact us](/en/contato/). diff --git a/content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md b/content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bdcaf99 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/pt-br/blog/rfc-10008-http-query.md @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +--- +title: "Entendendo a RFC 10008: O Método HTTP QUERY" +description: "Uma análise aprofundada sobre a RFC 10008, que introduz o método HTTP QUERY como uma alternativa segura e idempotente para consultas com grande volume de dados." +summary: "A RFC 10008 padroniza o método HTTP QUERY, preenchendo uma lacuna antiga entre GET e POST. Ele permite requisições seguras e idempotentes com parâmetros no corpo da requisição, resolvendo limites de tamanho de URIs e mantendo os benefícios de cache e retransmissão." +date: 2026-07-09 +draft: false +tags: ["http", "rfc", "desenvolvimento-web", "api", "arquitetura"] +categories: ["arquitetura"] +--- + +A IETF publicou oficialmente a **RFC 10008**, padronizando o método de requisição **HTTP QUERY**. Esta especificação define uma nova maneira padronizada de executar consultas seguras e idempotentes contendo parâmetros de consulta complexos ou volumosos dentro do corpo da requisição (request body). + +Por anos, desenvolvedores enfrentaram dilemas ao escolher entre `GET` e `POST` para endpoints de busca e consulta. A RFC 10008 preenche essa lacuna de maneira nativa, oferecendo uma solução limpa e idiomática para o design de APIs modernas. + +Abaixo, apresentamos uma análise completa do método HTTP QUERY, por que ele é importante e como utilizá-lo. + +--- + +## O Problema Histórico: GET vs. POST + +Tradicionalmente, as APIs web tinham duas opções principais para recuperar dados: + +1. **HTTP GET**: Excelente para recuperação de recursos porque é seguro (não altera o estado do servidor) e idempotente (pode ser repetido sem efeitos colaterais). No entanto, os parâmetros do `GET` precisam ser codificados na URI. Quando uma consulta possui parâmetros complexos (como filtros JSON aninhados, queries SQL brutas ou termos de busca muito longos), a URI pode rapidamente exceder os limites de tamanho (geralmente recomenda-se suporte a pelo menos 8000 octetos, mas as restrições variam em proxies e navegadores). Além disso, URIs são frequentemente gravadas em logs de texto simples, gerando riscos de segurança para dados confidenciais de consulta. +2. **HTTP POST**: Permite enviar parâmetros no corpo da requisição, contornando limitações de tamanho da URI e riscos de logging. No entanto, o `POST` não é semanticamente seguro ou idempotente por padrão. Caches, proxies e navegadores não podem repetir automaticamente requisições `POST` malsucedidas nem podem realizar o cache de seus resultados facilmente. + +### A Solução com o Método QUERY + +O método `QUERY` funciona como uma ponte entre os dois. Assim como no `POST`, a entrada para a operação de consulta é passada no corpo da requisição (conteúdo da query) e não na URI. E assim como no `GET`, o método é explicitamente **seguro** e **idempotente**, permitindo que recursos como cache e retransmissões automáticas operem de forma nativa. + +--- + +## Comparativo de Propriedades dos Métodos + +A tabela abaixo resume como o `QUERY` se compara ao `GET` e ao `POST` (adaptada da especificação oficial da RFC): + +| Propriedade | GET | QUERY | POST | +| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | +| **Seguro (Safe)** | Sim | Sim | Potencialmente Não | +| **Idempotente** | Sim | Sim | Potencialmente Não | +| **URI para a Query em si** | Sim (por definição) | Opcional (header `Location`) | Não | +| **URI para o Resultado** | Opcional (`Content-Location`) | Opcional (`Content-Location`) | Opcional (`Content-Location`) | +| **Cacheável** | Sim | Sim | Sim, mas apenas para GET/HEAD futuros | +| **Corpo da Requisição** | Sem semântica definida | Esperado (segundo regras do recurso) | Esperado (segundo regras do recurso) | + +--- + +## Exemplos Práticos + +Vejamos como uma consulta longa é transformada dos antigos formatos `GET` ou `POST` para o novo método `QUERY`. + +### O padrão antigo e verboso com GET: +Se os parâmetros forem muito grandes, este formato é ineficiente para processar, corre o risco de ser truncado e expõe informações confidenciais nos logs do servidor: + +```http +GET /feed?q=foo&limit=10&sort=-published&filter=conteudo-de-filtro-aninhado-altamente-especifico HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org +``` + +### O contorno comum com POST: +Embora proteja contra logs e truncamento, intermediários de rede não podem presumir que esta requisição é segura ou idempotente: + +```http +POST /feed HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org +Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded + +q=foo&limit=10&sort=-published +``` + +### O novo Método QUERY: +Ao realizar uma requisição `QUERY`, obtemos o melhor dos dois mundos: + +```http +QUERY /feed HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org +Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded +Accept: application/json + +q=foo&limit=10&sort=-published +``` + +#### Resposta: +```http +HTTP/1.1 200 OK +Content-Type: application/json + +[ + { "id": 1, "title": "Primeiro Resultado" }, + { "id": 2, "title": "Segundo Resultado" } +] +``` + +--- + +## Principais Características Técnicas da RFC 10008 + +### 1. O Cabeçalho `Accept-Query` +Os servidores podem anunciar suporte ao método `QUERY` e quais formatos aceitam através do cabeçalho de resposta `Accept-Query`. Ele utiliza a sintaxe moderna de "Campos Estruturados" (Structured Fields): + +```http +Accept-Query: "application/jsonpath", application/sql;charset="UTF-8" +``` + +Os clientes podem descobrir o suporte por meio de uma requisição `OPTIONS` ou inspecionando o cabeçalho `Allow` em uma resposta `405 Method Not Allowed`: + +```http +OPTIONS /contacts HTTP/1.1 +Host: example.org + +--- Resposta --- +HTTP/1.1 200 OK +Allow: GET, QUERY, OPTIONS, HEAD +``` + +### 2. Cache e Chaves de Cache (Cache Keys) +Fazer cache de requisições `QUERY` é inerentemente mais complexo do que fazer cache de requisições `GET` porque o cache precisa construir uma chave utilizando tanto a URI quanto o corpo da requisição (conteúdo da query), junto aos metadados associados. + +Para melhorar a eficiência, os caches têm permissão para normalizar diferenças pequenas e semanticamente insignificantes nos corpos das requisições (como remover espaços em branco no JSON ou remover codificações de conteúdo específicas) antes de gerar a chave de cache. + +### 3. Redirecionamento e Recursos Equivalentes +Ao processar um `QUERY`, o servidor pode atribuir uma URI para a própria definição de consulta ou para o resultado específico dela. + +- **Campo de resposta `Location`**: Indica uma URI que representa a consulta em si. O cliente pode enviar uma requisição `GET` padrão para esta URI para repetir a busca sem precisar reenviar o corpo pesado da requisição. +- **Campo de resposta `Content-Location`**: Aponta para um recurso temporário contendo o resultado estático da consulta que acabou de ser realizada. + +Por exemplo, o servidor pode responder com: + +```http +HTTP/1.1 200 OK +Content-Type: application/json +Location: /contacts/stored-queries/42 +Content-Location: /contacts/stored-results/17 +``` + +Os clientes podem, subsequentemente, enviar uma requisição `GET /contacts/stored-queries/42` para executar a mesma busca de forma simplificada. + +--- + +## Considerações de Segurança + +A RFC 10008 destaca várias vantagens e requisitos de segurança para os implementadores: + +- **Prevenção de Vazamento em Logs**: Parâmetros de busca sensíveis (como IDs de usuários ou chaves de busca personalizadas) ficam contidos no corpo, evitando a exposição em logs de servidores e proxies em texto claro. +- **URIs de Recursos Temporários**: Se o servidor atribuir uma URI para a consulta (utilizando `Location` ou `Content-Location`), ele **deve** garantir que essa nova URI gerada não exponha partes confidenciais do corpo original da requisição. +- **Tratamento de CORS**: Navegadores que implementam Compartilhamento de Recursos de Origem Cruzada (CORS) farão uma requisição de "preflight" (`OPTIONS`) antes de um `QUERY`, uma vez que ele não pertence ao grupo de métodos isentos de preflight pelo CORS. + +--- + +## Conclusão + +A padronização do método `QUERY` representa um marco importante para a arquitetura RESTful. Ela elimina o abuso semântico do `POST` para buscas, resolve as limitações de tamanho e vazamentos de segurança do `GET`, e abre caminhos mais eficientes para otimizações de cache em servidores de API e intermediários de rede. + +À medida que os frameworks web e proxies reversos começam a implementar suporte nativo para a RFC 10008, desenvolvedores devem considerar a adoção do `QUERY` para endpoints de filtragem, buscas complexas e relatórios que exijam grandes payloads. + +Para ler a especificação técnica completa, consulte o padrão oficial: +- [RFC 10008: The HTTP QUERY Method](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10008/) + +Deseja modernizar a arquitetura das suas APIs ou aprimorar a observabilidade dos seus sistemas? Na EF-TECH, ajudamos empresas a desenhar arquiteturas de software escaláveis, eficientes e robustas. [Entre em contato](/pt-br/contato/).