Problem: Showing dollar value instead of token count
Status: Already correct in code
Code: Number(amount) / 1e18 in ResultsView.tsx
Note: The display should show token amounts. If you're seeing dollar values, it might be a different issue.
Problem: Couldn't find incoming transfers even though they exist on Basescan
Root Cause: Was searching from fromBlock instead of from block 0
Fix: Changed to search from genesis block (0x0)
Before:
fromBlock: `0x${fromBlock.toString(16)}`, // Only searched recent blocksAfter:
fromBlock: '0x0', // Search ALL history from genesisThis ensures we find transfers no matter how old they are.
Problem: Incorrect parameters for Alchemy API Fixes Applied:
- Network Mapping: Added proper Base network support
'base-mainnet': Network.BASE_MAINNET,- Sorting Order: Fixed type error
order: SortingOrder.ASCENDING, // Was: 'asc' (wrong type)- Decimal Handling: Properly parse token decimals
const decimals = parseInt(transfer.rawContract.decimal || '0x12', 16);
const rawValue = ethers.parseUnits(transfer.value.toString(), decimals);- Search Range: Always search from block 0
fromBlock: '0x0', // Start from genesis
toBlock: `0x${toBlock.toString(16)}`, // Up to current blockAdded detailed logging to help debug:
this.log(`Using Alchemy fast API for transfers (searching from block 0 to ${toBlock})`);
this.log(`Alchemy API returned ${response.transfers.length} transfers instantly`);
this.log(` Transfer: ${from}... → ${to}... (${value} tokens, block ${blockNum})`);
this.log(`⚠️ No transfers found for ${address}... - wallet may have never received this token`);
this.log(`❌ Alchemy API failed: ${error}`);Using Alchemy fast API for transfers (searching from block 0 to 36230279)
Alchemy API returned 5 transfers instantly
Transfer: 0x1234... → 0x4735... (100.5 tokens, block 35000000)
Transfer: 0x5678... → 0x4735... (50.2 tokens, block 35500000)
...
⚠️ No transfers found for 0x4735... - wallet may have never received this token
This means:
- The wallet never received this specific token, OR
- The token address is incorrect, OR
- There's an API issue (will fall back to RPC)
- ✅ Search starts from block 0 (finds old transfers)
- ✅ Proper network mapping for Base
- ✅ Correct decimal handling
- ✅ Detailed logging for debugging
- ✅ Fallback to RPC if Alchemy fails
Possible Causes:
- Wallet never received tokens (check Basescan)
- Seller is a contract (stops at contract)
- API returned 0 transfers
- Wrong token address
Debug Steps:
- Check detailed logs (expand "Show Details")
- Verify token address is correct
- Check if seller address exists on Basescan
- Verify network is correct (base-mainnet)
Cause: Timestamp is 0 (not fetched) Status: Known issue - timestamps not critical for tracing Fix: Can be added if needed
Fallback: Automatically uses standard RPC Log: "Falling back to standard RPC method..." Impact: Slower but still works
Make sure your Alchemy configuration uses:
- Network:
base-mainnet(for Base) - API Key: Your Alchemy API key
- Provider:
alchemy
The app will automatically map this to Network.BASE_MAINNET in the SDK.
- Clear browser cache and reload
- Check detailed logs (click "Show Details")
- Verify token address is correct
- Ensure network is set to "base-mainnet"
- Check if transfers exist on Basescan for that wallet + token
12:30:00 - Initializing Blockchain Service
Provider: alchemy, Block Range: 10
12:30:00 - Alchemy SDK initialized for fast transfers API
12:30:01 - Token Tracer
[Depth 0] Tracing wallet 0x4735...1fc7 at block 36230279
12:30:01 - Token Tracer
[Depth 0] Searching for first incoming transfer to 0x4735...1fc7...
12:30:01 - Blockchain API
Using Alchemy fast API for transfers (searching from block 0 to 36230279)
12:30:02 - Blockchain API
Alchemy API returned 3 transfers instantly
12:30:02 - Blockchain API
Transfer: 0xabcd... → 0x4735... (213.5653 tokens, block 35123456)
12:30:02 - Token Tracer
Found 3 incoming transfer(s) for 0x4735...1fc7
12:30:02 - Token Tracer
[Depth 0] Found transfer from 0xabcd... at block 35123456
12:30:02 - Token Tracer
[Depth 0] → Recursively tracing 0xabcd...
If you see "0 transfers" but Basescan shows transfers, there's likely a mismatch in:
- Token address
- Network
- Wallet address