You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary: Add a small threading control input to mention-in-pr and mention-in-issue so replies can consistently target the triggering comment via add_comment.reply_to_id instead of always creating top-level comments.
Why a Customer Would Want This
Teams using /ai mention workflows want less timeline noise and clearer conversation context. Threaded replies keep the bot response attached to the exact request, which is easier to follow in busy PRs/issues and avoids comment pileups.
Rough Implementation Sketch
Add a new optional workflow input (for example reply-in-thread) in the source workflows for:
.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-pr.md
.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-issue.md
Update the prompt instructions so when enabled, the agent sets reply_to_id to the triggering comment ID on add_comment.
Recompile lock workflows and update workflow READMEs to document the new behavior and default.
Keep behavior backward-compatible (opt-in or carefully chosen default) so adopters can roll this out safely.
Why It Won't Be That Hard
This mostly wires existing capabilities together: safe outputs for both mention workflows already accept reply_to_id, so the work is confined to prompt/input plumbing and docs.
Evidence
Mention workflow inputs currently have no threading control:
Feature Idea
Summary: Add a small threading control input to
mention-in-prandmention-in-issueso replies can consistently target the triggering comment viaadd_comment.reply_to_idinstead of always creating top-level comments.Why a Customer Would Want This
Teams using
/aimention workflows want less timeline noise and clearer conversation context. Threaded replies keep the bot response attached to the exact request, which is easier to follow in busy PRs/issues and avoids comment pileups.Rough Implementation Sketch
reply-in-thread) in the source workflows for:.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-pr.md.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-issue.mdreply_to_idto the triggering comment ID onadd_comment.Why It Won't Be That Hard
This mostly wires existing capabilities together: safe outputs for both mention workflows already accept
reply_to_id, so the work is confined to prompt/input plumbing and docs.Evidence
gh-agent-workflows/mention-in-pr/README.md#L26-L33gh-agent-workflows/mention-in-issue/README.md#L25-L32add_comment:.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-pr.md#L208-L211.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-issue.md#L133-L136reply_to_id) in these workflows:.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-pr.lock.yml#L844-L845and#L867-L870.github/workflows/gh-aw-mention-in-issue.lock.yml#L706-L707and#L727-L730Note
🔒 Integrity filter blocked 47 items
The following items were blocked because they don't meet the GitHub integrity level.
search_pull_requests: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".To allow these resources, lower
min-integrityin your GitHub frontmatter:What is this? | From workflow: Trigger Product Manager Impersonator
Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.