You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The decision tree is the core practical artifact of Naked Process. It takes your team's context as input and outputs the minimal viable process — the smallest set of practices that addresses your actual constraints.
Dimensions
1. Team Capability
Value
Description
Uniformly strong
All members operate at a high level. Shared mental models. Minimal need for guidance.
Mixed with clear lead
Range of skill levels, but a strong technical lead provides architectural direction.
Junior-heavy / no lead
Most members need guidance. No one capable of making reliable architectural calls.
2. Deployment Capability
Value
Description
Continuous delivery
Can deploy to production at any time. Automated pipeline, feature flags, rollback.
Frequent but batched
Regular releases (weekly/biweekly) but not continuous. Some manual steps.
Infrequent / manual
Releases are rare, painful, and risky. High coordination cost per deployment.
3. Stakeholder Access
Value
Description
Direct and frequent
Team can reach decision-makers quickly. Feedback loops measured in hours.
Mediated
Access through project managers, product owners, or other intermediaries. Days-scale latency.
Absent or adversarial
Stakeholders are unreachable, disengaged, or actively obstructive.
4. Decision Authority
Value
Description
Team-autonomous
Team can make and execute technical and scope decisions without external approval.
Lead-autonomous
A designated lead has authority. Team executes within the lead's architectural vision.
Externally gated
Decisions require approval from outside the team. Committee-driven or politically constrained.
5. Problem Clarity
Value
Description
Genuinely emergent
Requirements cannot be known upfront. True exploration, R&D, or novel domain.
Discoverable
Requirements exist but haven't been gathered yet. Common failure mode: teams running "Agile discovery" on problems that aren't actually uncertain. Needs upfront engineering discipline.
Well-specified
Requirements are clear and stable. Execution-focused. Minimal need for discovery ceremony.
6. Coordination Need
Value
Description
Low
Small team (3–5), co-located or well-aligned remote. Minimal integration points.
Medium
Mid-sized team (6–10) or multiple integration points. Some coordination overhead.
High
Large team, multiple sub-teams, distributed across time zones, complex integration.
How It Works
The decision tree logic is currently being developed. The goal: for any combination of dimension values, output the minimal set of practices (communication channel, release cadence, feedback mechanism, decision structure) that addresses the team's actual constraints.
The tree subtracts. Given a strong team with CD, direct stakeholders, autonomous decisions, clear requirements, and low coordination — the output approaches zero formal process. Each constraint you add introduces only the practices needed to address that specific constraint.
Status
🔄 In development. The dimensions are stable. The practice decomposition (Step 2) and mapping (Step 3) are in progress.