|
5 | 5 | <p> |
6 | 6 | This chapter is co-authored by Francesca Gandini, Sumner Strom, Al Ashir Intisar |
7 | 7 | </p> |
8 | | - </introduction> |
9 | | - <!-- <section xml:id="sec-template"> |
10 | | - <title>Template </title> |
11 | | - <p> |
12 | | - This is the introduction to the template. |
13 | | - </p> |
14 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-template"> |
15 | | - <title>Template Subsection</title> |
16 | | - <p> |
17 | | - This is the template subsection. |
18 | | - </p> |
19 | | - |
20 | | - </subsection> |
21 | | - </section> --> |
22 | | - |
23 | | - <section xml:id="sec-notes"> |
24 | | - <title>Notes</title> |
25 | | - |
26 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-notes"> |
27 | | - <title>Notes Subsection</title> |
28 | | - <p> |
29 | | - To build in pretext use the template subsection and pretext environment features. |
30 | | - Make sure that you are building and compiling from main using preview code chat. |
31 | | - Additionally, when running if the compilation fails run the command "pretext build web" in terminal. |
32 | | - Make sure that all of the xml have unique ids so that you dont run into compilation errors. |
33 | | - Follow the other chapters to find out how things are used. |
34 | | - Make sure that the sections are properly linked within the main.ptx. Additionally, use the subsections and sections for organization. |
35 | | - If something doesnt display there is a paragraph line missing. |
36 | | - |
37 | | - </p> |
38 | | - |
39 | | - </subsection> |
40 | | - </section> |
| 8 | + </introduction> |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | + |
41 | 11 | <section xml:id="sec-m2-codespace"> |
42 | 12 | <title>Creating a M2 Codespace</title> |
43 | 13 |
|
@@ -514,202 +484,5 @@ This chapter is co-authored by Francesca Gandini, Sumner Strom, Al Ashir Intisar |
514 | 484 | </section> |
515 | 485 |
|
516 | 486 | </section> |
517 | | -<section xml:id="sec-invariantrings-theory"> |
518 | | - <title>InvariantRings Theory</title> |
519 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-finite-matrix-groups"> |
520 | | - <title>Finite Matrix Groups</title> |
521 | | - <p>Example: |
522 | | - Consider <me>M = \begin{pmatrix} |
523 | | -1 \amp 0 \\ |
524 | | -0 \amp -1 \\ |
525 | | -\end{pmatrix} </me> and the vector <m>\bar x = \begin{pmatrix} x\\ y\\ \end{pmatrix}</m> |
526 | | -This gives <m>M \bar x = \begin{bmatrix} |
527 | | -x \\ |
528 | | --y \\ |
529 | | -\end{bmatrix}</m>. Thus for the polynomial <m> f(\bar x) = f(\begin{bmatrix} |
530 | | -x \\ |
531 | | -y \\ |
532 | | -\end{bmatrix}) = x+y</m> we have <m>f(M\bar x) = f(\begin{bmatrix} |
533 | | -x \\ |
534 | | --y \\ |
535 | | -\end{bmatrix})= x-y</m>. |
536 | | - |
537 | | - |
538 | | - </p> |
539 | | - <p> |
540 | | - <definition><p> <m>G \leq GLm(\mathbb{K}), |G| < \infty</m>, then <m>G</m> is a finite matrix group. |
541 | | - (In other words if <m>G</m> is a group of actions under which <m>\mathbb{K}</m> remains invariant |
542 | | - under then it is smaller or equal to the total amount of group actions <m>GLm(\mathbb{K})</m> that |
543 | | - would keep the polynomial invariant. AND the <m>|G|</m> is finite then <m>G</m> is a finite matrix |
544 | | - group?) |
545 | | - </p></definition> |
546 | | - </p> |
547 | | - <p> |
548 | | - NOTE: An action of a finite group <m>G \curvearrowright \mathbb{K}^n</m> given a realization of <m>G</m> as a finite matrix group. </p><p> |
549 | | -Example: <m>\langle \begin{bmatrix} |
550 | | -1 \amp 0 \\ |
551 | | -0 \amp -1 \\ |
552 | | -\end{bmatrix} \rangle = \{ \begin{bmatrix} |
553 | | -1 \amp 0 \\ |
554 | | -0 \amp -1 \\ |
555 | | -\end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix} |
556 | | -1 \amp 0 \\ |
557 | | -0 \amp 1 \\ |
558 | | -\end{bmatrix}\} \cong C_2</m> |
559 | | - </p> |
560 | | - </subsection> |
561 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-invariant-rings"> |
562 | | - <title>Invariant Rings</title> |
563 | | - <p> |
564 | | - \textbf{Notation <m>\bar x = (x_1, x_2,..., x_n)</m>, with <m>R = \mathbb{K}[x_1,x_2,...,x_n]</m>} |
565 | | - <definition> <p> <m>G</m> is a finite matrix group within <m>GLm(\mathbb{K})</m> when? |
566 | | -<m>f\in \mathbb{K}[x_1,x_2,...,x_n]</m> is invariant under the action of <m>G</m> if and only if |
567 | | - <m>f(A\bar x) = f(\bar x)</m>, <m>\forall A \in G</m>. |
568 | | - </p></definition> |
569 | | -</p><p> |
570 | | -Ex. <m>f(\bar x)=x</m> and <m>f(\bar x) = x +y^2</m> in <m>\mathbb{K}[x_1,x_2,...,x_n]</m> is invariant under <m>C_2 = \langle\begin{bmatrix} |
571 | | -1 \amp 0 \\ |
572 | | -0 \amp -1 \\ |
573 | | -\end{bmatrix} \rangle</m>\\ |
574 | | -However <m>f(\bar x)=x+y</m> is not. What are others? |
575 | | - </p> |
576 | | - <p> |
577 | | - <definition><p> <m>R^G : = \{f \in R \, | f(A\bar x) = f(\bar x), \forall A \in G\} \subseteq R</m> |
578 | | - is the invariant ring for the action of <m>G</m> |
579 | | - </p></definition> |
580 | | - </p> |
581 | | - <p> |
582 | | - Show this is a subring.</p> |
583 | | - <p> How does on find generators for <m>R^G</m>?</p> |
584 | | - <p> Is <m>R^G</m> even finitely generated?</p> |
585 | | - <p> Work through Hilbert's proof. |
586 | | - </p>} |
587 | | - </subsection> |
588 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-reynolds-operator"> |
589 | | - <title>Reynolds Operator</title> |
590 | | - <p> |
591 | | - Idea: "Averaging" over the action of <m>G</m> we get an invariant |
592 | | - </p> |
593 | | - <p> |
594 | | - <definition> <p> <m>R_G: R \xrightarrow{} R^G</m> <me>R_G(f) = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{A\in G} f(A \bar x) </me> |
595 | | - Exercise: <m>R_G</m> has many nice properties? \textbf{WHAT MORE TO SAY HERE}</p></definition> |
596 | | - </p> |
597 | | - <p>Example: <m>C_2 = \langle\begin{bmatrix} |
598 | | - 1 \amp 0 \\ |
599 | | - 0 \amp -1 \\ |
600 | | - \end{bmatrix}\rangle</m> <me>R_G(x+y) = \frac{1}{2} ((x+y) + (x-y)) = x\in R^G</me> |
601 | | - |
602 | | - </p> |
603 | | - </subsection> |
604 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-noether-degree-bound"> |
605 | | - <title>Nöether Degree Bound(NDB)</title> |
606 | | - <p> |
607 | | - <theorem><p> (Noether): <me>R^G = \mathbb{K} [ R_G(\bar x^{\bar \beta}) | \; |\bar \beta| \leq |G|]</me> |
608 | | - <m>\implies</m> NDB : The ring of invariants is generated in degrees <m>\leq |G|</m> |
609 | | - </p></theorem> |
610 | | - </p> |
611 | | - <p> |
612 | | - Note: This is a computational tool! We can apply <m>R_G</m> to all the finitely many monomials in degrees <m>\leq |G|</m> to get generators for <m>R^G</m>. |
613 | | - Exercise: Try this for <m>C_4</m> ... show! |
614 | | - </p> |
615 | | - </subsection> |
616 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-hilbert-ideal"> |
617 | | - <title>Hildbert Ideal</title> |
618 | | - <p> |
619 | | - Note: In general for <m>\{ f_1,..., f_s\} \subseteq \R</m>,\\ <m>\{f_1,...f_s\}</m> and <m>\R</m> can be quite different objects |
620 | | - Exercise? |
621 | | - </p> |
622 | | - <p> |
623 | | - <theorem><p> Let <m>J_G = R(R^G)_t</m>, ideal generated by all positive degree invariants.\\ |
624 | | - If <m>J_G = (f_1,...,f_s)</m> and <m>f_i\in R^G, \,\, \forall i</m> |
625 | | - (apply <m>R^G</m> if it is not), then <m>R^G = \mathbb{K}[f_1,...f_s]</m> |
626 | | - </p></theorem> |
627 | | - </p> |
628 | | - </subsection> |
629 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-presentations"> |
630 | | - <title>Presentations</title> |
631 | | - <p> |
632 | | - <definition><p>Definition: Let <m>S = \mathbb{K}[f_1,...f_s] \subset R</m>. |
633 | | - A presentation of <m>S</m> is a map, <me>T=: \mathbb{K}[u_1,...u_s] \xrightarrow{\phi}S</me> |
634 | | - such that <m>\frac{T}{ker(\phi)} \cong S</m> With the syzygies of <m>f_i</m>'s |
635 | | - giving the presentation ideal. |
636 | | - </p></definition> |
637 | | - </p> |
638 | | - <p> |
639 | | - <proposition><p>(Elimination Theory): In <m>S \bigotimes \mathbb{K}[u_1,...,u_s = \mathbb{K}[x_1,...,x_n,u_1,...u_s]</m> consider the ideal, |
640 | | - <me>I = (u_i - f_x(\bar x) | \, \langle f_i\rangle = S</me> |
641 | | - Then, |
642 | | - <me>ker \phi = I \cap \mathbb{K}[u_1,...,u_s]</me> |
643 | | - </p></proposition> |
644 | | - </p> |
645 | | - <p> |
646 | | - <algorithm><p> compute a Groebner Basis <m>G</m> for <m>I</m> with elimination order for the <m>x</m>'s.\\ |
647 | | - Then, <m>G \cap \mathbb{K}[y_1,...y_s]</m> is the Groebner Basis for <m>ker \phi</m> |
648 | | - </p></algorithm> |
649 | | - </p> |
650 | | - </subsection> |
651 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-graph-of-linear-actions"> |
652 | | - <title>Graph of Linear Actions</title> |
653 | | - <p> |
654 | | - <definition> <p>let <m>G \leq GL_n(\mathbb{K}), \,\, G\curvearrowright \mathbb{K}^n =:V, \,\, |G|\infty</m>. |
655 | | - For <m>A\in G</m> consider, |
656 | | - <me>V_A = \{(\bar v, A\bar v)|\,\,v\in V\} \subseteq V\bigotimes V</me> |
657 | | - Then <m>A_G = \cup_{A\in G}V_A</m> is the subspace arrangement associated to the action of G. |
658 | | - </p></definition> |
659 | | - </p> |
660 | | - <p> |
661 | | - Note: <m>V_A</m> is a linear subspace, <m>\mathbb{I}(V_A):=</m> set of polynomials vanishing on <m>\mathbb{V}_A</m> is a linear ideal. |
662 | | - Example: <me>V_{\begin{bmatrix} |
663 | | - 1 \amp 0 \\ |
664 | | - 0 \amp -1 \\ |
665 | | - \end{bmatrix}} = \{(x_1,x_2,x_1,-x_2)\} = V(y_1,-x_1, y_2+x_2)</me> |
666 | | - </p> |
667 | | - </subsection> |
668 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-subspace-arrangement-approach"> |
669 | | - <title>Subspace Arrangement Approach</title> |
670 | | - <p> |
671 | | - <theorem><p> |
672 | | - (Dekseu): Let <m>I_G = \mathbb{I}(A_G) = \cap_{A\in G}\mathbb{I}(V_A) \subseteq \mathbb{K}[x_1,...x_n,y_1,...y_n].</m> |
673 | | - \textbf{(ARE n and n or m and n THESE DIFFERENT?)}\\ |
674 | | - Then <me>(I_G +(y_1,...,y_n)) \cap \R = J_G</me> This uses elimination theory and the Hilbert ideal. |
675 | | - </p> </theorem> |
676 | | - </p> |
677 | | - <p> |
678 | | - Note: The same approach works in the exterior algebra! |
679 | | - </p> |
680 | | - <p> |
681 | | - <theorem><p>Let <m>I_G^{'} = \cap_{A\in G} \mathbb{I}(V_A) \subseteq \Lambda(\bar x, \bar y)</m>.\\ |
682 | | - Then <me>(I_G^{'} +(y_1,...y_n)) \cap \Lambda(x_1,...,x_n) = J_G^{'} : = \Lambda(\bar x)(\Lambda(\bar x)^G)_+</me> |
683 | | - </p></theorem> |
684 | | - </p> |
685 | | - <p> |
686 | | - Note: This approach is slow for polynomials, but might be fast for skew polynomials. |
687 | | - </p> |
688 | | - </subsection> |
689 | | - <subsection xml:id="subsec-AGWM"> |
690 | | - <title>Abelian GPS and Weight Matrices</title> |
691 | | - <p> |
692 | | - Let <m>G \cong \mathbb{Z}_d, \bigoplus....\bigoplus \mathbb{Z}_{dr}, \,\,\,\,\, d_i|d_{i+1}</m> for <m>1 \leq i \leq r-1</m>\\ |
693 | | - <me>\langle g_1\rangle \bigoplus...\bigoplus\langle g_r \rangle, \,\,\,\,\, |g_i| =d_i</me> |
694 | | - A diagonal action of <m>G</m> on <m>R</m> is given by |
695 | | - <me>g_i \cdot x_j = \mu_i^{\omega ij}x_j</me> |
696 | | - for <m> \mu_i : d_i^{th}</m> primitive root of unity and <m>i \in [x]</m>,<m>j \in [n]</m>. |
697 | | - And encoded in the weight matrix <m>W = (\omega_{ij})_{ij} = ?????????????</m> |
698 | | - </p> |
699 | | - <p> |
700 | | - <theorem><p> <m>\bar x^{\bar \beta} \in R^G \iff W_{\bar \beta}\cong (0,...,0)</m> for |
701 | | - zeros being the weight of <m>g_1</m> acting on <m>\bar x^{\bar \beta}</m> and being modulo <m>d_i</m>. |
702 | | - </p></theorem> |
703 | | - </p> |
704 | | - <p> |
705 | | - Note: We can examine all monomials <m>|\bar \beta| \leq |G|</m> and sort them by their weight <m>W\bar \beta</m>. |
706 | | - The ones with weight <m>\bar 0</m> will be invariant! |
707 | | - </p> |
708 | | - <p> |
709 | | - Question: Does this work for monomials in the exterior algebra? |
710 | | - </p> |
711 | | - </subsection> |
712 | | - |
713 | 487 |
|
714 | | - </section> |
715 | 488 | </chapter> |
0 commit comments