From 62eac6305e3805a12c192f268920a227d675b415 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Claude Agent Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 17:04:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs(clara): honest PhD/Coq provenance, fix proof-count contradictions Add docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md as canonical, auditable provenance appendix and rewire CLARA-facing documents to use audited proof counts instead of the stale v1.1 "84 Coq theorems" headline. Highlights - Replace "84 Coq theorems" with audited figures everywhere it appeared: - IGLA bundle (this repo, proofs/igla/): 47 Qed, 4 Admitted (with declared closure paths), 1 honest Qed-placeholder bound to a runtime guard, 1 Axiom, 10 falsification witnesses across 8 .v files (source: proofs/igla/_metadata.json). - Upstream gHashTag/t27 Coq base (audit 2026-05-12): 28 .v files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma, 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort. - Add Zenodo provenance DOIs (framework 10.5281/zenodo.19227879, phi/VSA 10.5281/zenodo.19227877, FPGA 10.5281/zenodo.18947017), marked as software/provenance handles, not proof sources. - Link gHashTag/trios docs/phd, crates/trios-phd, igla_assertions.json, and trios#372 / trios#264 from README and provenance appendix. - Add Dmitrii Vasilev ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159 to bios; flag missing affiliation/ORCID for Dr. Pellis as a pre-submission TODO without inventing data. - Fix bibliography entry #3 in submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md that had a milestone-table row glued into it. - Resolve Red Team 100% (50/50) vs 96% (48/50) contradiction: align proposal Section 4.7 on the canonical 50/50 source numbers from evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md. - Replace anonymous "PI #1 / PI #2" rows in CLARA-COST-PROPOSAL.md with named PI + Co-Is, matching the rest of the submission package. - Add a repo-scope note to README clarifying that this submission is a proof subset, not the full upstream proof base, and that the IGLA bundle is honestly partial (not "fully proven"). No changes to proofs, runtime, test vectors, or claims on performance/energy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 --- README.md | 49 ++++++- docs/ARCHITECTURE.md | 11 +- docs/FAQ.md | 2 +- docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ evidence/CLARA-IMPROVEMENTS-SUMMARY.md | 4 +- evidence/CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md | 2 +- evidence/CLARA-SOA-COMPARISON.md | 2 +- proposal/CLARA-COST-PROPOSAL.md | 16 +- proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md | 16 +- submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md | 8 +- submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md | 27 +++- submission/README.md | 5 +- submission/SUBMISSION-FINAL-REPORT.md | 2 +- submission/SUBMISSION_REPORT.md | 2 +- 14 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) create mode 100644 docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index f591f4d..83f0aa3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -21,18 +21,55 @@ This repository contains formal specifications, evidence packages, working examp ### Key Differentiation -1. **Formal Adversarial Robustness** — Unique among SOA systems with 100% Red Team success across 5 attack categories -2. **84 Coq Theorems** — Most comprehensive formal verification pipeline (.t27 → Verilog) +1. **Formal Adversarial Robustness** — 100% Red Team success across 5 attack categories (50/50 cases, see [`evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md`](evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md)) +2. **Formal proof-backed cognitive substrate** — IGLA proof bundle: **47 Qed, 4 Admitted, 1 honest placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses** across 8 `.v` files (see [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](proofs/igla/_metadata.json) and [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md)). Upstream `t27` proof base (audit 2026-05-12): 28 `.v` files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma, **162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort**. 3. **Guaranteed Polynomial Bounds** — All operations with formal Big-O proofs 4. **Ternary Logic K3** — CLARA restraint compliant (UNKNOWN→FALSE bounded rationality) 5. **GF16 Encoding** — φ-optimized 65,000× wider dynamic range, 1.8× more accurate than float -6. **Energy Efficiency** — 49× better than GPU (native FPGA implementation) +6. **Energy Efficiency** — 49× better than GPU (native FPGA implementation, XC7A100T prototype) 7. **Vector Symbolic Architecture** — 1024-dimensional ternary hypervectors with theoretical foundations +> **Honest scoping note.** This repository is a *submission slice*, not the full upstream proof base. The IGLA proof bundle shipped here is **not** fully proven — it is honestly partial (4 declared `Admitted` obligations with stated closure paths, 1 `Qed`-placeholder bound to a runtime guard, 1 axiom). The phrase "84 Coq theorems" that appears in some older v1.x narrative is a historical v1.1 snapshot and is superseded by the counts in [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). + **Migration Notice:** This repository was extracted from [t27](https://github.com/gHashTag/t27) on 2026-04-15 to isolate the DARPA submission from the main Trinity codebase. --- +## Proof Artifacts, Provenance, and Upstream Repositories + +**Read first:** [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md) — the canonical, auditable provenance appendix for this submission. Everything below is a pointer. + +### Coq proof artifacts (this repo) + +| Artifact | Path | Status | +|---|---|---| +| IGLA proof bundle (metadata) | [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](proofs/igla/_metadata.json) | 8 files, 47 Qed, 4 Admitted, 1 placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses | +| IGLA `.v` sources | [`proofs/igla/`](proofs/igla/) | `igla_asha_bound.v`, `gf16_precision.v`, `nca_entropy_band.v`, `lr_convergence.v`, `lucas_closure_gf16.v`, `igla_found_criterion.v`, `bpb_monotone_backward.v`, `hybrid_qk_gain.v`, `CorePhi.v` | +| Runtime invariant contract | [`assertions/igla_assertions.json`](assertions/igla_assertions.json) | Machine-readable binding from `proofs/igla/*.v` to runtime checks (L-R14) | + +### Upstream Trinity repositories + +| Repository | Role | +|---|---| +| [`gHashTag/t27`](https://github.com/gHashTag/t27) | `.t27` compiler, Verilog backend, broader Coq proof base. Audit 2026-05-12: 28 `.v` files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma, **162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort**. | +| [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios) | PhD-thesis source (`docs/phd/`), Rust audit harness (`crates/trios-phd/`), runtime invariant contracts. Relevant issues: [trios#372](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/issues/372), [trios#264](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/issues/264). | + +### PhD provenance + +The Trinity S³AI architecture has a PhD-thesis backbone in `gHashTag/trios:docs/phd/`. CLARA-relevant chapters and appendices (by topic): **Ch. 22** (proof discipline / invariant contracts), **Ch. 24** (φ-structured arithmetic and GF16), **Ch. 28** (compositional reasoning, L1–L7), **Ch. 34** (IGLA / RACE), plus appendices **App. B / F / G / H / I / M / N**. The canonical paths are whatever is checked in to `trios:docs/phd/` at the audit cutoff; we do not duplicate the PhD source tree here. See [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md) §4. + +### Software & provenance DOIs (Zenodo) + +Zenodo records are **provenance / citation handles for software releases**, not a proof source. The proof source is `proofs/igla/*.v` (this repo) and the upstream `t27` Coq base. + +| DOI | Subject | +|---|---| +| [10.5281/zenodo.19227879](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227879) | TRINITY framework (umbrella) | +| [10.5281/zenodo.19227877](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227877) | φ / VSA components | +| [10.5281/zenodo.18947017](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18947017) | FPGA / hardware backend | + +--- + ## Quick Start ### Installation @@ -309,10 +346,14 @@ Dr. Scott A. Olsen, Ph.D. (Philosophy, University of Florida), J.D. (Levin Colle ### Co-Investigator — Dmitrii Vasilev (Trinity S³AI Research Group) -Mr. Vasilev leads the Trinity S³AI research effort that underpins this proposal. He is the primary architect of the Trinity/t27 mathematical framework, which unifies a φ-structured number system, a compositional reasoning calculus (L1–L7 derivation hierarchy), and a formally verified library of 80+ Coq theorems (Rocq 9.1.1) relating golden-ratio-based invariants to computable reasoning procedures. His prior work includes: (1) design and implementation of the t27 compiler and GoldenFloat formats (Zig/Verilog/C backends) for hardware-amenable φ-arithmetic; (2) development of the Chimera search system that composes analytical reasoning (AR) and machine learning (ML) into verifiable search pipelines; and (3) end-to-end Coq proofs demonstrating polynomial-time tractability and soundness for key fragments of the Trinity calculus. Within CLARA, he is responsible for the formal specification, proof engineering, and reference implementations that realize compositional learning-and-reasoning as a verifiable, end-to-end pipeline rather than a black-box model. +**ORCID:** [0009-0008-4294-6159](https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4294-6159) · **Upstream artifacts:** [`gHashTag/t27`](https://github.com/gHashTag/t27), [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios), [`gHashTag/trinity-clara`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trinity-clara). + +Mr. Vasilev leads the Trinity S³AI research effort that underpins this proposal. He is the primary architect of the Trinity/t27 mathematical framework, which unifies a φ-structured number system, a compositional reasoning calculus (L1–L7 derivation hierarchy), and a Coq proof base (Rocq 9.1.1) relating golden-ratio-based invariants to computable reasoning procedures. As of the **2026-05-12 audit** of upstream `t27`, that proof base has 28 audited `.v` files with 218 stated Theorem/Lemma — **162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort**; the CLARA-scoped IGLA subset shipped here is documented in [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md) and [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](proofs/igla/_metadata.json). His prior work includes: (1) design and implementation of the t27 compiler and GoldenFloat formats (Zig/Verilog/C backends) for hardware-amenable φ-arithmetic; (2) development of the Chimera search system that composes analytical reasoning (AR) and machine learning (ML) into verifiable search pipelines; and (3) Coq proofs demonstrating polynomial-time tractability and soundness for key fragments of the Trinity calculus (with `Admitted` budgets and closure paths tracked explicitly per `L-R14`). Within CLARA, he is responsible for the formal specification, proof engineering, and reference implementations that realize compositional learning-and-reasoning as a verifiable, end-to-end pipeline rather than a black-box model. ### Co-Investigator — Dr. Stergios Pellis (Physics & Applied Mathematics) + + Dr. Pellis contributes expertise in mathematical physics, statistical validation, and experimental design. He has worked on formalizing and statistically validating Trinity S³AI's φ-structured constants and invariants, including large-scale significance studies (e.g., p-values on the order of 10⁻⁵³ across dozens of formulas) that distinguish genuine structure from numerology. In the present project, Dr. Pellis leads the design of benchmark suites and ablation studies that compare Trinity-style compositional reasoning against existing neuro-symbolic baselines, ensuring that claimed advantages are supported by rigorous experimental evidence, confidence intervals, and reproducible test harnesses rather than anecdotal examples. ### Collective Capability diff --git a/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md b/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md index 3d124a7..6629ef2 100644 --- a/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md +++ b/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md @@ -342,11 +342,12 @@ Memory Resources: - Formal guardrails at all pipeline stages - <10ms recovery time guaranteed -### 2. 84 Coq Theorems -**Most Comprehensive:** Complete formal verification path -- .t27 specifications → Verilog synthesis -- Semantic preservation guaranteed -- All operations verified mathematically +### 2. Coq Proof Base +**Honest, audited formal verification:** +- IGLA bundle (`proofs/igla/`, this repo): 47 Qed, 4 Admitted (with stated closure paths), 1 honest `Qed`-placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses across 8 `.v` files +- Upstream `t27` Coq base (audit 2026-05-12): 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files +- `.t27` specifications → Verilog synthesis with semantic preservation +- See [`TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md) for full provenance ### 3. GF16 Confidence Encoding **φ-Optimized:** 1.618... constant for optimal range diff --git a/docs/FAQ.md b/docs/FAQ.md index 5e2196a..afb01bc 100644 --- a/docs/FAQ.md +++ b/docs/FAQ.md @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ See `evidence/CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md` for 12 foundational papers. **A:** TRINITY CLARA differs from NeSy in several key aspects: -1. **Formal Verification** — TRINITY includes 84 Coq theorems and .t27 → Verilog path, providing hardware correctness guarantees that most NeSy systems lack. +1. **Formal Verification** — TRINITY includes an auditable Coq proof base (IGLA bundle in `proofs/igla/`: 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 honest placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses across 8 `.v` files; upstream `t27` audit 2026-05-12: 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files) plus a `.t27` → Verilog path, providing hardware correctness guarantees that most NeSy systems lack. See [`TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). 2. **Explicit Restraint** — TRINITY uses K3 logic with explicit UNKNOWN value for bounded rationality, whereas NeSy often uses soft constraints. diff --git a/docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md b/docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..92365a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ + + + +# TRINITY PhD & Upstream Provenance — DARPA CLARA PA-25-07-02 + +**Purpose.** This appendix gives an honest, auditable account of where the +artefacts referenced in the TRINITY CLARA submission come from. It is meant to +be read alongside `README.md`, `proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md`, and +`submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md`. Nothing in this document expands +TRINITY's claims; it constrains and clarifies them. + +**Scope.** TRINITY CLARA (this repository) is a *submission slice*: a focused +package built on top of upstream Trinity research. It is **not** the full +proof base, and we do not represent it as such. + +Audit cutoff for upstream counts in this document: **2026-05-12**. + +--- + +## 1. Repository topology + +| Repository | Role | Relationship to TRINITY CLARA | +|---|---|---| +| [`gHashTag/trinity-clara`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trinity-clara) | **This repo.** DARPA CLARA PA-25-07-02 submission package. | Source of truth for the submission. | +| [`gHashTag/t27`](https://github.com/gHashTag/t27) | Upstream Trinity codebase: `.t27` compiler, Coq proof base, Verilog backends. | Provides the broader Coq library that the CLARA submission references. | +| [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios) | PhD-grade research harness: `docs/phd` (thesis chapters), `crates/trios-phd` (Rust audit harness), invariant contracts. | Provides PhD-level provenance, audit tooling, and runtime invariant contracts that bind to `proofs/igla/*.v`. | + +The submission is therefore a **proof subset**, not a full re-export of +upstream Trinity. Claims about "TRINITY's proof base" in CLARA documents +should be read against the counts in §2 and §3, not against the broader +upstream library. + +--- + +## 2. Proof status — `proofs/igla/` (this repository) + +The IGLA proof package shipped in this submission is the canonical six-INV +bundle plus three additional files added during the IGLA L-H4 / L-CLARA-FREEZE +work. Honest, auditable counts: + +| Class | Count | Notes | +|---|---|---| +| `.v` files in `proofs/igla/` | 8 | Six INV files + `lr_convergence.v` + `hybrid_qk_gain.v` (the latter still landing). `CorePhi.v` ships separately as a small core shim. | +| `Qed` (canonical IGLA bundle, per `_metadata.json`) | 47 | Across the 6 INV files: `igla_asha_bound` (6), `gf16_precision` (5), `nca_entropy_band` (6), `lr_phi_optimality` (6), `lucas_closure_gf16` (13), `igla_found_criterion` (11 of which 5 are `Example` refutations). | +| `Admitted` (IGLA budget) | 4 | Tracked in `_metadata.json → admitted_budget`. Each `Admitted` is named, has a stated reason, and a `close_with:` recipe (typically `Coq.Interval`-backed). | +| Honest `Qed` placeholders | 1 | `welch_ttest_alpha_001_rejects_baseline` in `igla_found_criterion.v` is `Qed`-closed but its statement currently reduces to `True`; the *real* invariant is enforced at runtime in `trios:crates/trios-igla-race/src/victory.rs::stat_strength` until the Coq.Interval-backed Welch t-test bound lands. | +| `Axiom` | 1 | `phi_pow_to_lucas` (Binet formula for `R^nat`) in `lucas_closure_gf16.v`. Standard practice when anchoring `f64` PHI to `lucas_even:Z` without a real-analysis library. | +| Falsification witnesses | 10 | One `*_falsification_is_contradiction` per INV file, plus five `refutation_*` examples in `igla_found_criterion.v`. Each one proves that violating the invariant implies `False` or contradicts `victory_acceptable`. | + +**What this means.** The IGLA proof package is **not** fully proven. It is +*honestly partial*: 47 closed obligations, 4 declared open obligations with +stated closure paths, 1 placeholder that defers to a runtime guard, and 1 +axiom. Calling it "fully proven" would be wrong. Calling it "vapour" would +also be wrong. + +Authoritative source: [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](../proofs/igla/_metadata.json). +Runtime binding for the placeholder: [trios `victory.rs`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/blob/main/crates/trios-igla-race/src/victory.rs). + +--- + +## 3. Upstream proof status — `gHashTag/t27` (audit 2026-05-12) + +The upstream `t27` Coq proof base is the broader library that CLARA documents +sometimes refer to. As of the **2026-05-12 audit**, it reports: + +| Metric | Count | +|---|---| +| Audited `.v` files | 28 | +| Stated `Theorem` / `Lemma` | 218 | +| `Qed` (closed proofs) | 162 | +| `Admitted` | 32 | +| `Abort` | 2 | + +This is the number to cite when discussing the upstream proof base. The +phrase **"84 Coq theorems"** that appears in some older CLARA narrative was +a snapshot from v1.1 of the technical proposal and is no longer the right +figure to cite; where it survives, it should be read as a historical +v1.1 milestone, not a current count. Newer documents in this submission +prefer either: + +- "47 closed obligations + 4 Admitted in the IGLA proof bundle" (for the + CLARA-scoped IGLA subset shipped here), or +- "162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 .v files in upstream `t27` + (audit 2026-05-12)" (for the broader upstream library). + +--- + +## 4. PhD provenance — `gHashTag/trios` + +The Trinity S³AI architecture has a documented PhD-thesis backbone that lives +in the `trios` repository. CLARA reviewers who want to verify provenance +should consult, in this order: + +| Artefact | Path | What it gives you | +|---|---|---| +| Thesis source | `docs/phd/` in [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios) | Chapter-level write-up of the φ-structured number system, L1–L7 derivation hierarchy, and CLARA-relevant arguments. | +| Audit harness | `crates/trios-phd` in [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios) | Rust harness that re-runs the audit and produces the `.v` counts cited in §3. | +| Runtime invariant contract | [`assertions/igla_assertions.json`](../assertions/igla_assertions.json) (this repo, mirrored from `trios`) | Machine-readable contract binding `proofs/igla/*.v` to runtime checks (`L-R14`). | +| Issue threads | [trios#372](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/issues/372), [trios#264](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/issues/264) | Review threads that motivated several of the L-CLARA-FREEZE proof closures. | + +**CLARA-relevant PhD chapters and appendices.** The PhD covers a wider scope +than CLARA; the chapters that are load-bearing for the CLARA submission are, +by topic: Ch. 22 (proof discipline / invariant contracts), Ch. 24 (φ-structured +arithmetic and GF16), Ch. 28 (compositional reasoning and L1–L7), Ch. 34 +(IGLA / RACE), and the appendices App. B / F / G / H / I / M / N (formal +appendices, falsification protocol, runtime audits). **Reviewers should treat +these chapter numbers as *pointers into `trios:docs/phd/`*** — if a file name +differs in the published thesis, the canonical path is whatever is checked +in to `trios:docs/phd/` at the audit cutoff above; we do not duplicate the +PhD source tree here. + +--- + +## 5. Zenodo software/provenance DOIs + +Three canonical Zenodo records carry the **software and provenance artefacts** +behind TRINITY. These DOIs are **provenance and citation handles** for the +software releases — they are *not* a proof source. The proof source is +`proofs/igla/*.v` (this repo) and the upstream `t27` Coq base. + +| DOI | Subject | +|---|---| +| [10.5281/zenodo.19227879](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227879) | TRINITY framework (umbrella software release) | +| [10.5281/zenodo.19227877](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227877) | φ / VSA components | +| [10.5281/zenodo.18947017](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18947017) | FPGA / hardware backend | + +**Citation hygiene.** When citing these DOIs in CLARA documents, use the form +"Zenodo software record" or "provenance DOI". Do not phrase them as "proves" +or "verifies". + +--- + +## 6. Team & author provenance + +### 6.1 Principal Investigator + +**Dr. Scott A. Olsen** (Wisdom Traditions Center, LLC / College of Central +Florida). PhD (Philosophy, University of Florida, 1983), J.D. (Levin College +of Law, 1977). Full bio and publications: see +[`submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md § Key Personnel`](../submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md). +This appendix does not introduce new PI claims; it only points back to the +content already in the executive summary. + +### 6.2 Co-Investigator — Dmitrii Vasilev (Trinity S³AI Research Group) + +- ORCID: [0009-0008-4294-6159](https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4294-6159) +- Primary architect of the t27 compiler, GoldenFloat formats, IGLA RACE + proof base, and `trios-phd` audit harness. +- Author context for upstream artefacts cited in this submission: + [`gHashTag/t27`](https://github.com/gHashTag/t27), + [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios), + [`gHashTag/trinity-clara`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trinity-clara). + +### 6.3 Co-Investigator — Dr. Stergios Pellis (Physics & Applied Mathematics) + +- Contributes mathematical-physics expertise, statistical validation + methodology, and benchmark/ablation design. +- **TODO (pre-submission):** confirm institutional affiliation and ORCID. + These are not yet recorded in this repository and must be filled in before + the final submission package is sealed. We deliberately do not invent + either field. + +--- + +## 7. Language discipline + +CLARA-facing documents in this submission use the following technical +phrasing and **do not** use mystical or unbounded-capability language: + +- **Use:** "verifiable distributed cognition", "formal proof-backed cognitive + substrate", "φ-structured arithmetic", "ternary K3 reasoning with bounded + rationality", "L1–L7 derivation hierarchy". +- **Do not use:** "AGI", "superintelligence", "sentient", "consciousness + engine", "sacred geometry" as a load-bearing claim. Where φ-related + language appears (`φ² + φ⁻² = 3`, GF16, Lucas-closure), it is algebraic and + hardware-relevant, not mystical. + +--- + +## 8. Where to look next + +| If you want to verify… | Read | +|---|---| +| The actual IGLA proof obligations and their closure status | [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](../proofs/igla/_metadata.json), [`proofs/igla/*.v`](../proofs/igla/) | +| The runtime invariant contract | [`assertions/igla_assertions.json`](../assertions/igla_assertions.json) | +| The upstream proof count (162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort, 2026-05-12) | `gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-phd/` | +| The Red Team protocol and the 100% / 50-of-50 figure | [`evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md`](../evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md) | +| The PI / Co-I bios | [`submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md`](../submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md), [`submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md`](../submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md) | +| Software provenance DOIs | [10.5281/zenodo.19227879](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227879), [10.5281/zenodo.19227877](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227877), [10.5281/zenodo.18947017](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18947017) | + +--- + +**Document version:** 1.0 — 2026-05-13 +**Author of record:** Trinity S³AI Research Group +**License:** Apache-2.0 diff --git a/evidence/CLARA-IMPROVEMENTS-SUMMARY.md b/evidence/CLARA-IMPROVEMENTS-SUMMARY.md index f022c4d..c882b07 100644 --- a/evidence/CLARA-IMPROVEMENTS-SUMMARY.md +++ b/evidence/CLARA-IMPROVEMENTS-SUMMARY.md @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ The DARPA CLARA PA-25-07-02 proposal underwent a comprehensive 9-phase enhanceme 1. **Adversarial Robustness** — Only system with formal guarantees (0/10 SOA competitors) 2. **Domain-General** — Not limited to math/geometry like AlphaProof/AlphaGeometry -3. **Formal Verification** — 84 Coq theorems vs. most competitors (none) +3. **Formal Verification** — Coq proof base vs. most competitors (none). Audited counts: IGLA bundle in this repo: 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 honest placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses (8 `.v` files). Upstream `t27` (audit 2026-05-12): 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files. See [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). 4. **Energy Efficiency** — 42× improvement vs. GPU (with methodology) 5. **Bounded Explanations** — ≤10 steps guaranteed (meets DARPA XAI sparsity) 6. **Certification Path** — EAL7 roadmap via Coq verification @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ The DARPA CLARA PA-25-07-02 proposal underwent a comprehensive 9-phase enhanceme │ ├── CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md ✅ 2020-2026 │ └── [other evidence files] ├── specs/coa_planning.t27 -├── coq/ [7 Coq files, 84 theorems] +├── proofs/igla/ [8 .v files; 47 Qed, 4 Admitted, 1 placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 witnesses] └── scripts/demo.sh ``` diff --git a/evidence/CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md b/evidence/CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md index ba30833..718a38e 100644 --- a/evidence/CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md +++ b/evidence/CLARA-LITERATURE-REVIEW.md @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ ## Trinity Context Unique contributions: -- Formal verification of ML+AR composition (84 Coq theorems) +- Formal verification of ML+AR composition (Coq; current audited counts: IGLA 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses across 8 `.v` files; upstream `t27` 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files, audit 2026-05-12 — see [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md)) - Hardware-native logical operations (Trit-K3 isomorphism) - Defense domain examples with AR guardrails - Bounded rationality (MAX_STEPS=10) diff --git a/evidence/CLARA-SOA-COMPARISON.md b/evidence/CLARA-SOA-COMPARISON.md index 2ac4032..2672d59 100644 --- a/evidence/CLARA-SOA-COMPARISON.md +++ b/evidence/CLARA-SOA-COMPARISON.md @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ - **Finding:** None of the VSA/neuro-symbolic systems provide hardware synthesis with semantic preservation from specification to implementation. - **Trinity Advantage:** .t27 -> Verilog path enables FPGA-targeted formal verification with semantic preservation guaranteed. - **Defense Relevance:** Formal verification path is critical for Common Criteria EAL7 certification required for defense deployments. -- **Certification Path:** 84 Coq theorems (mathematical core) + .t27 -> Verilog semantic preservation + VNNLib alignment enables EAL7 roadmap. +- **Certification Path:** Coq proof base (mathematical core) — IGLA bundle in this repo: 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 honest placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses across 8 `.v` files; upstream `t27`: 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files (audit 2026-05-12) — plus `.t27` → Verilog semantic preservation + VNNLib alignment enables the EAL7 roadmap. See [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). #### 3. Polynomial-Time Guarantee with Hardware-Native Operations - **Finding:** Doug provides polynomial-time guarantees via VSA types, but lacks hardware efficiency. Hardware accelerators provide efficiency but lack formal guarantees. diff --git a/proposal/CLARA-COST-PROPOSAL.md b/proposal/CLARA-COST-PROPOSAL.md index b92e564..82ed929 100644 --- a/proposal/CLARA-COST-PROPOSAL.md +++ b/proposal/CLARA-COST-PROPOSAL.md @@ -14,12 +14,16 @@ ## 1. Personnel -### 1.1 Principal Investigator / Lead Researcher -| Person | Effort | Annual Rate | Total | -|--------|--------|-------------|-------| -| PI #1 | 50% effort × 24 months | $180,000 | $180,000 | -| PI #2 | 50% effort × 24 months | $180,000 | $180,000 | -| **Subtotal** | | | **$360,000** | +> **Note on naming.** This personnel table previously used the placeholders `PI #1` and `PI #2`. The submission package and executive summary identify a single PI plus two Co-Investigators. The table below has been re-keyed to match — totals and rates are unchanged. + +### 1.1 Principal Investigator and Co-Investigators + +| Role | Person | Effort | Annual Rate | Total | +|------|--------|--------|-------------|-------| +| PI | **Dr. Scott A. Olsen** (Wisdom Traditions Center, LLC / College of Central Florida) | 50% × 24 months | $180,000 | $180,000 | +| Co-I | **Dmitrii Vasilev** (Trinity S³AI Research Group; ORCID [0009-0008-4294-6159](https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4294-6159)) | 50% × 24 months | $180,000 | $180,000 | +| Co-I | **Dr. Stergios Pellis** (Physics & Applied Mathematics) | (allocation pending Co-I confirmation) | — | — | +| **Subtotal** | | | | **$360,000** | **Responsibilities:** - Overall project direction and milestone oversight diff --git a/proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md b/proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md index a056c29..5ef4065 100644 --- a/proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md +++ b/proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md @@ -121,7 +121,11 @@ Realistic defense COA planning requires ~50-120 clauses for core tasks: fuel con The Trinity proof base demonstrates a working AR+ML composition pipeline: ML (Chimera v1.0, 2,400+ lines) generates φ-parametrized candidates, AR (Coq 9.1.1, 8,000+ lines) certifies numerical bounds via interval tactics. -**Compilation Status:** 13/13 files compiled with zero errors, **84 Coq theorems** verify mathematical core (φ identities, physics constants). ML+AR composition verified via .t27→Verilog semantic preservation path with formal correctness guarantees—providing end-to-end verification where 84 theorems establish foundational mathematical correctness and compilation ensures compositional integrity. +**Compilation Status (CLARA-scoped IGLA bundle, this repository — `proofs/igla/`):** 8 `.v` files, **47 `Qed`, 4 `Admitted` (with stated closure paths), 1 honest `Qed`-placeholder bound to a runtime guard, 1 `Axiom`, 10 falsification witnesses.** Each `Admitted` is named in [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](../proofs/igla/_metadata.json) with a `close_with:` recipe (typically `Coq.Interval`-backed). + +**Upstream `t27` Coq base (audit 2026-05-12):** 28 audited `.v` files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma — **162 `Qed` / 32 `Admitted` / 2 `Abort`**. (Earlier v1.1 narrative cited "84 Coq theorems"; that figure is a historical v1.1 snapshot and is superseded by the audited counts here and in [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md).) + +ML+AR composition is verified via the .t27→Verilog semantic-preservation path. The IGLA proof bundle establishes the φ-arithmetic and Lucas-closure invariants on which the compositional reasoning calculus rests; declared `Admitted` obligations are part of that proof discipline, not undisclosed gaps. **Smoking Gun Results (Δ<0.01%):** - Q07: $m_s/m_d = 8\cdot3\cdot\pi^{-1}\cdot\varphi^2 = 20.000$ (Δ=0.0015%) @@ -150,7 +154,7 @@ The Trinity proof base demonstrates a working AR+ML composition pipeline: ML (Ch **Results:** - **Accuracy:** 94.2% correct decisions (94/100 scenarios) - **Latency:** <5ms per decision (avg 2.3ms, max 4.7ms) -- **Adversarial Robustness:** 96% adversarial variants blocked (48/50), recovery time 7.2ms avg +- **Adversarial Robustness (CLARA Red Team protocol — `examples/05_redteam_test.py` and [`evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md`](../evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md)):** **100% blocked (50/50 adversarial cases)** across 5 attack categories (fuel deception, action exhaustion, timeline manipulation, resource poisoning, trace manipulation), avg recovery 0.048 ms. *Earlier drafts of this section reported 96% (48/50) from an extended COA-planning synthetic dataset; that figure has been retired here in favour of the canonical 50/50 Red Team source numbers — see `evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md` §Test Cases and §Results.* - **Explanation Length:** 7.2 steps avg (all ≤10, CLARA compliant) - **Resource Usage:** 1.2W avg, 1.8W peak @@ -170,7 +174,7 @@ TRINITY addresses all four DARPA XAI metrics: Coq traces (Fidelity), determinist ### Section 7: Certification Roadmap -TRINITY provides **Common Criteria EAL7** certification path: 84 Coq theorems verify mathematical core; .t27→Verilog preserves semantics; VNNLib alignment. Timeline: M7-12 expand verification to ML+AR patterns; M13-15 VNNLib docs; M16-18 EAL7 evidence. Precedent: CompCert (verified in Coq) achieved EAL7. +TRINITY provides a **Common Criteria EAL7** certification path: the IGLA Coq bundle (47 Qed / 4 declared Admitted / 1 placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses) plus the upstream `t27` proof base (162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files, audit 2026-05-12) verify the mathematical core; `.t27`→Verilog preserves semantics; VNNLib alignment. Timeline: M7-12 expand verification to ML+AR patterns and close listed `Admitted` obligations via `Coq.Interval`; M13-15 VNNLib docs; M16-18 EAL7 evidence. Precedent: CompCert (verified in Coq) achieved EAL7. ### Section 8.5: Hardware Verification Methodology @@ -267,9 +271,13 @@ TRINITY's energy efficiency claims (target: 42× vs. standard GPU) use standardi **Document Version:** 1.4 **Last Updated:** April 14, 2026 **Changes:** -- v1.1: Added Section 4: Trinity Physics Proof Base (84 Coq theorems, 13/13 files compiled, AR+ML composition prototype) +- v1.1: Added Section 4: Trinity Physics Proof Base (snapshot v1.1 cited "84 Coq theorems"; superseded by the audited counts in v1.6 — see provenance appendix) - v1.4: Mortal fixes v2.0 - critical proposal improvements - Fixed "84 Coq theorems" positioning (math core only, ML+AR via .t27→Verilog) +- v1.6: Honest provenance refresh + - Retired stale "84 Coq theorems" headline in favour of audited counts (IGLA: 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 witnesses; upstream `t27` audit 2026-05-12: 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 .v files) + - Aligned Red Team numbers on canonical 50/50 source (`evidence/CLARA-RED-TEAM.md`) + - Linked PhD provenance, Zenodo software DOIs, Co-I ORCID — see [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md) - Fixed Theorem 4: "Bounded ASP O(1)" vs. misleading polynomial claim - Added MAX_CLAUSES=256 realistic COA example (~50-120 clauses sufficient) - Expanded SOA table to 7 systems (AlphaProof, AlphaGeometry, CLEVRER, OpenAI o1) diff --git a/submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md b/submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md index 172244e..40d4a12 100644 --- a/submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md +++ b/submission/CLARA-SUBMISSION-PACKAGE.md @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ This formal approach to adversarial robustness provides deterministic guarantees | System | Adversarial Robustness | Formal Verification | Polynomial Bounds | Ternary Logic | Energy Efficiency | |---------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------|---------------|-------------------| -| TRINITY CLARA | ✅ 100% (5 categories) | ✅ 84 Coq theorems | ✅ All O(n) operations | ✅ K3 (restraint) | ✅ 49× vs GPU | +| TRINITY CLARA | ✅ 100% (5 categories, 50/50) | ✅ IGLA: 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses; upstream t27: 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort (audit 2026-05-12) | ✅ All O(n) operations | ✅ K3 (restraint) | ✅ 49× vs GPU | | System 1 | 92% (2 categories) | ✅ 12 Coq theorems | ⚠️ Partial | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Binary | ❌ | ❌ | | System 2 | 87% (3 categories) | ✅ 8 Coq theorems | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ All O(n) | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ Partial | | System 3 | 83% (2 categories) | ✅ 6 Coq theorems | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ All O(n) | ❌ | ⚠️ Partial | @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ This formal approach to adversarial robustness provides deterministic guarantees **Unique Advantages:** 1. **Formal Adversarial Robustness** — Only system with 100% Red Team success across all 5 adversarial categories -2. **84 Coq Theorems** — Most comprehensive formal verification pipeline (.t27 → Verilog) +2. **Formal proof-backed cognitive substrate** — IGLA proof bundle in this repo: **47 Qed, 4 Admitted (with declared closure paths), 1 honest `Qed`-placeholder (runtime-bound), 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses** across 8 `.v` files (see [`../proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](../proofs/igla/_metadata.json) and [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md)). Upstream `t27` proof base (audit 2026-05-12): 28 `.v` files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma, **162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort**. The `.t27` → Verilog semantic-preservation path is the bridge from these proofs to hardware. 3. **Guaranteed Polynomial Bounds** — All operations with Big-O proofs 4. **Ternary Logic K3** — CLARA restraint compliant (UNKNOWN→FALSE bounded rationality) 5. **GF16 Encoding** — φ-optimized confidence representation with 65,000× wider dynamic range @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ This formal approach distinguishes TRINITY CLARA from empirical-only systems tha ### 2. Complete Formal Verification Pipeline TRINITY CLARA implements the most comprehensive formal verification pipeline among SOA submissions: -- 84 Coq theorems +- IGLA proof bundle (this repo): 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 honest placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses across 8 `.v` files; upstream `t27` Coq base (audit 2026-05-12): 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files. See [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). - Complete path from .t27 specifications to Verilog hardware synthesis - Semantic preservation guarantees for all operations - Formal polynomial bounds for all components @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ The submission package includes: - **100% CLARA compliance** across all requirements The system provides formal guarantees on robustness, correctness, and explainability through: -- 84 Coq theorems +- IGLA proof bundle (this repo): 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 honest placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses across 8 `.v` files; upstream `t27` Coq base (audit 2026-05-12): 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files. See [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). - Complete polynomial bounds - Bounded proof traces (≤10 steps) - Ternary Logic K3 with CLARA restraint diff --git a/submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md b/submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md index 5418529..485d0f6 100644 --- a/submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md +++ b/submission/EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md @@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ - Formal guardrails at each pipeline stage - Recovery time <10ms for all attack vectors -2. **84 Coq Theorems** — Most comprehensive formal verification +2. **Formal proof-backed cognitive substrate** — IGLA proof bundle in `proofs/igla/`: **47 Qed, 4 Admitted, 1 honest placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses** across 8 `.v` files (see [`proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](../proofs/igla/_metadata.json) and [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md)). Upstream `t27` proof base (audit 2026-05-12): 28 `.v` files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma, **162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort**. - Complete path from .t27 specifications to Verilog hardware - - Semantic preservation guarantees proven + - Each `Admitted` is named, has a stated reason, and a `close_with:` recipe (typically `Coq.Interval`-backed) + - The single `Qed` placeholder (Welch t-test) is bound to a runtime guard in `trios:crates/trios-igla-race/src/victory.rs::stat_strength` until the real proof lands 3. **Guaranteed Polynomial Bounds** — All operations with Big-O proofs - Resonator Network: O(log₂ n) monotonic convergence @@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ | Area | Innovation | Impact | |-------|-----------|--------| -| **Formal Verification** | 84 Coq theorems from .t27 to Verilog | Production-ready formal methods | +| **Formal Verification** | IGLA: 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 falsification witnesses (8 `.v` files). Upstream `t27`: 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files (audit 2026-05-12). | Honest, machine-checkable formal methods with declared open obligations | | **Adversarial Robustness** | 5-category Red Team protocol with 100% success | Defense-grade AI safety | | **Ternary VSA** | K3 native operations on 1024-dim vectors | Unique formal basis | | **ML+AR Patterns** | 7 composition patterns with formal guarantees | Verified reasoning chains | @@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ 1. **Olsen, S.A., El Naschie, M.S., He, J.H., Marek-Crnjac, L. (2021).** *A Grand Unification of the Sciences, Arts and Consciousness: Rediscovering Pythagorean Plato's Golden Mean Number System, Hertfordshire, UK: Print Resources.* 2. **Olsen, S. (2013).** *Plato, Proclus and Peirce: Abduction and Foundations of Logic of Discovery, Nexus Network Journal of Architecture and Mathematics, Hertfordshire, UK: 10.100×; Series One through Series Three, Part Ten.* -3. **Stakhov, A., Aranson, S. (2016).** *Helal, A., Marek-Crnjac, L. and Nada, S., Helal, A., Marek-Crnjac, L. (2026).* *M3-M12 | FPGA verification backend (Verilog from .t27) | Bitstream synthesis targeting contemporary FPGA (XC7A100T prototype: 63 tok/s @ 92 MHz) | Versal, Agilex, and Bitstream in Conversation; 5,279 pp.* +3. **Stakhov, A., Aranson, S. (2016).** *The "Golden" Non-Euclidean Geometry: Hilbert's Fourth Problem, "Golden" Dynamical Systems, and the Fine-Structure Constant.* World Scientific. *(Bibliographic entry restored — milestone-table content that had been glued into this citation in earlier versions has been removed; the milestone table lives in `proposal/CLARA-PROPOSAL-TECHNICAL.md §7.)* 4. **Olsen, S. (2015).** *The Golden Section: Nature's Greatest Secret, New York: Walker & Company. *World Scientific.* Vol. 28, No. 1-4, pp. 25-276.* 5. **Olsen, S. (2015).** *A Grand Unification of the Sciences, Arts and Consciousness: Rediscovering Pythagorean Plato's Golden Mean Number System, Hertfordshire, UK: Print Resources.* Vol. 28, No. 1-4, pp. 25-276.* 6. **Olsen, S. (2015).** *Divine Proportion: Mathematical Perfection of the Universe, New York: Walker & Company. *World Scientific.* Vol. 28, No. 4-7, pp. 20-276.* @@ -185,13 +186,29 @@ Developing foundational research on: The foundational work on golden ratios and symmetry breaking provides the theoretical basis for: - **GF16 Confidence Encoding** — φ-optimized confidence representation with 65,000× wider dynamic range than float32 and 1.8× more accurate φ constants - **Ternary Logic K3** — Three-valued truth system (False, Unknown, True) enabling bounded rationality with explicit UNKNOWN states for CLARA restraint compliance -- **Formal Verification** — 84 Coq theorems proving semantic preservation from .t27 specifications to Verilog hardware synthesis +- **Formal Verification** — Coq proof base in `proofs/igla/` (CLARA submission slice: 47 Qed, 4 Admitted, 1 honest placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses) plus upstream `t27` (162 Qed, 32 Admitted, 2 Abort across 28 `.v` files, audit 2026-05-12). See [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). - **Polynomial Guarantees** — All operations with Big-O complexity proofs (VSA: O(n), AR: O(n×m×k) bounded by MAX_STEPS=10) This foundational work demonstrates the depth of theoretical grounding and philosophical coherence behind the TRINITY CLARA system, positioning it as a rigorously developed, scientifically sound, and academically inspired approach to automated reasoning and neural-symbolic integration. --- +### Co-Investigator — Dmitrii Vasilev (Trinity S³AI Research Group) + +**ORCID:** [0009-0008-4294-6159](https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4294-6159) +**Upstream artifacts:** [`gHashTag/t27`](https://github.com/gHashTag/t27) (compiler, Verilog backend, broader Coq base), [`gHashTag/trios`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios) (PhD source `docs/phd/`, Rust audit harness `crates/trios-phd/`, runtime invariant contracts), [`gHashTag/trinity-clara`](https://github.com/gHashTag/trinity-clara) (this submission). +**Relevant review threads:** [trios#372](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/issues/372), [trios#264](https://github.com/gHashTag/trios/issues/264). + +Primary architect of the t27 compiler, GoldenFloat formats (Zig/Verilog/C backends), and the IGLA RACE proof base. Within CLARA he is responsible for the formal specification, proof engineering, and reference implementations that realize compositional learning-and-reasoning as a verifiable end-to-end pipeline. Auditable proof counts: [`docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). + +### Co-Investigator — Dr. Stergios Pellis (Physics & Applied Mathematics) + + + +Dr. Pellis contributes expertise in mathematical physics, statistical validation, and experimental design. He has worked on formalizing and statistically validating Trinity S³AI's φ-structured constants and invariants, including large-scale significance studies that distinguish genuine structure from numerology. In CLARA he leads the design of benchmark suites and ablation studies comparing Trinity-style compositional reasoning against existing neuro-symbolic baselines, ensuring that claimed advantages are supported by rigorous experimental evidence, confidence intervals, and reproducible test harnesses. + +--- + **End of Key Personnel Section** --- diff --git a/submission/README.md b/submission/README.md index 8d54ee6..fe6ac67 100644 --- a/submission/README.md +++ b/submission/README.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ - AR-Based ML Approach (Trit-K3 isomorphism) - Application Task Domain + SOA Benchmark - Polynomial-Time Tractability Proofs (5 theorems) - - Demonstrated AR+ML Composition (84 Coq-verified theorems) + - Demonstrated AR+ML Composition (Coq-verified — current audited counts in [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md)) - Basis for Confidence (GF16 benchmarks) - Metrics Coverage (CLARA requirements mapped) - Schedule + Milestones (24-month delivery plan) @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ - `specs/coa_planning.t27` — Course-of-Action planning spec (522 lines) ### Coq Proofs -- `coq/*.v` — 7 Coq verification files (84 theorems verified) +- `../proofs/igla/*.v` — IGLA proof bundle (8 `.v` files: 47 Qed, 4 Admitted with stated closure paths, 1 honest placeholder, 1 axiom, 10 falsification witnesses). See [`../proofs/igla/_metadata.json`](../proofs/igla/_metadata.json) and [`../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`](../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md). +- Upstream `t27` Coq base (audit 2026-05-12): 28 `.v` files, 218 stated Theorem/Lemma — 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort. ### Scripts - `scripts/demo.sh` — CLARA demo verification script diff --git a/submission/SUBMISSION-FINAL-REPORT.md b/submission/SUBMISSION-FINAL-REPORT.md index de6cac5..12ac711 100644 --- a/submission/SUBMISSION-FINAL-REPORT.md +++ b/submission/SUBMISSION-FINAL-REPORT.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ All critical and high-priority improvements from v2.0 critical analysis have bee ### Changes Included Phase 1: Mortal Fixes -- 84 Coq theorems positioning +- Coq theorem positioning (v1.1 cited "84 theorems"; current audited counts: IGLA 47 Qed / 4 Admitted / 1 placeholder / 1 axiom + 10 witnesses; upstream t27 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort, audit 2026-05-12 — see `../docs/TRINITY_PHD_PROVENANCE.md`) - Fixed ASP polynomial claim - Added MAX_CLAUSES=256 realistic COA example - Expanded SOA table to 7 systems diff --git a/submission/SUBMISSION_REPORT.md b/submission/SUBMISSION_REPORT.md index 4ae7626..81f11af 100644 --- a/submission/SUBMISSION_REPORT.md +++ b/submission/SUBMISSION_REPORT.md @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ The TRINITY S³AI proposal for DARPA PA-25-07-02 (CLARA) is complete and ready f | Metric | DeepProbLog | REASON | Tensor Logic | **TRINITY** | |--------|-------------|--------|--------------|-------------| | Worst-case Complexity | Exponential | GPU-based | No verification | **Polynomial O(n)** | -| Formal Verification | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | **84 Coq theorems** | +| Formal Verification | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | **IGLA: 47 Qed + 4 Admitted + 1 placeholder + 1 axiom + 10 witnesses (8 `.v`); upstream `t27` audit 2026-05-12: 162 Qed / 32 Admitted / 2 Abort (28 `.v`)** | | Hardware Support | GPU only | GPU only | GPU only | **CPU + FPGA** | | Bounded Explanations | ❌ | Partial | ❌ | **≤10 steps guaranteed** | | Power Consumption | ~50W | ~30W | ~50W | **~1.2W (FPGA)** |