Include adding upstream?

[gaand]

For those rebase moments.

[RealWeeks]

Actually I'm struggling to come up with a good demo for this.

[RealWeeks]

@gaand upstream added

[jrhorn424]

Do you think this is appropriate scope? I never have students update a talk repo fork after I deliver it.

[RealWeeks]

I was so confused by the discussion until I saw the rename. @berziiii I'm going to rename it back so the conversation makes sense and add a needs discussion tag. For now I'm going to keep it. @jrhorn424 @gaand thoughts on this?

[jrhorn424]

I'm still not sure this makes sense. We could demo it by adding the ga-wdi-boston upstream, I suppose. @payne-chris-r What are your thoughts on showing remotes and upstreams?

Maybe not for rebasing but at least to see the remote commands? @gaand

[payne-chris-r]

Didn't have time to address this for this iteration. I think it's a good idea, and adding the main repo as an upstream is probably a good idea.

[jrhorn424]

@payne-chris-r Looks like it's in there?

[jrhorn424]

Wat?