Commit d1711f5
committed
yeast: Fix bug in matching
Turns out, `(_)` would match both named and unnamed nodes, as we never
checked the value of the `match_unnamed` field. This is the real reason
why the final catch-all rule we removed in the last commit was
superfluous -- unnamed nodes were being caught by the penultimate rule
instead (and mapped to `unsupported_node`).
Having fixed the bug, we now (correctly) get errors due to unmatched
unnamed nodes in the input. To fix this, we change the catch-all rule to
match unnamed nodes as well. This restores the previous behaviour
exactly.
At some point, we should find a better way to handle unnamed nodes, as
it seems wasteful to map these to `unsupported_node` (since we in
practice only use them for their string content). Perhaps we should not
attempt to translate unnamed nodes at all?(_)
1 parent a099c44 commit d1711f5
2 files changed
Lines changed: 20 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
66 | 66 | | |
67 | 67 | | |
68 | 68 | | |
69 | | - | |
| 69 | + | |
| 70 | + | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
70 | 80 | | |
71 | 81 | | |
72 | 82 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1147 | 1147 | | |
1148 | 1148 | | |
1149 | 1149 | | |
1150 | | - | |
1151 | | - | |
| 1150 | + | |
| 1151 | + | |
| 1152 | + | |
| 1153 | + | |
| 1154 | + | |
| 1155 | + | |
| 1156 | + | |
| 1157 | + | |
| 1158 | + | |
1152 | 1159 | | |
1153 | 1160 | | |
1154 | 1161 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments