Skip to content

Commit cee5b04

Browse files
committed
Merge pull request #6 from rizomaa/master
Added page "decision making"
2 parents 35d52ff + 59421a3 commit cee5b04

2 files changed

Lines changed: 16 additions & 1 deletion

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ A collaboratively designed framework for planning activist campaigns. _Started a
55
Elements to think about when planning a campaign:
66
* [defining the issue](issue.md)
77
* goals
8-
* decision-making
8+
* [decision-making](decision-making.md)
99
* [people / stakeholders](people.md)
1010
* identifying roles (activists, partners, allies, targets, leadership)
1111
* advocacy

decision-making.md

Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
1+
#Decision-making
2+
3+
There are at least two the most popular aproaches:
4+
* Doocracy is an organizational way where every individual chooses own role and/or task and does it autonomously or in a team. But accontability sticks to actor who implement task/role but not who is officially assigned.
5+
* The main advantages of the approach big motivation and a pace of implementation.
6+
* Disadvantages are burn out of team core.
7+
* Consensus is an organizational approach where any decision are made by agreement of a whole group of actors.
8+
* Benefits are sustantibility and deep understanding tack and roles by each member of collective.
9+
* Drawbacks: Very timeconsuming and not flexible.
10+
11+
**Option: The better way is to cimbine the methods.
12+
13+
##References
14+
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-ocracy
15+
* https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)