Add ATOMIC attribute

[HenryHRich]

Have ATOMIC@ATOMIC use @: code

If a verb is ATOMIC, reblock very large arguments for best use of caches

[moon-chilled]

does this need a new attribute? should just need u rank<=v rank

reblock very large arguments for best use of caches

ideal solution to this is a compiler, to fuse everything. Obvious difficulties

[HenryHRich]

It needs a minimum-rank attribute for a verb, to make sure the system doesn't subdivide a unit.

…

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022, 3:23 AM moon-chilled ***@***.***> wrote: does this need a new attribute? should just need u rank<=v rank reblock very large arguments for best use of caches ideal solution to this is a compiler, to fuse everything. Obvious difficulties — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#76 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEKVAJ32KHWVTGVBPMQVIQDVFJTH7ANCNFSM5EPUIEAA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[HenryHRich]

atomic@atomic now gives a warning; breaking rank loops is an ongoing project