Skip to content

GOVERNANCE.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
229 lines (148 loc) · 7.02 KB

GOVERNANCE.md

File metadata and controls

229 lines (148 loc) · 7.02 KB

Governance Model

Overview

liblab.ai follows a Modified Open Governance model that balances community input with efficient decision-making. Our governance structure is designed to support the rapid development of AI-powered developer tools while maintaining transparency and community engagement.

Decision-Making Process

Technical Decisions

  • Core Maintainers make technical decisions including architecture, dependencies, and implementation approaches
  • Community input is gathered through GitHub Issues for major technical changes
  • RFC Process for significant changes that affect the user experience or API

Strategic Decisions

  • Project Leadership Team makes decisions about roadmap, partnerships, and major feature priorities
  • Community feedback is actively sought through GitHub Issues and user research

Administrative Decisions

  • Liblab, Inc. maintains control over branding, legal matters, and infrastructure
  • Community Manager handles day-to-day community operations

Roles and Responsibilities

Project Leadership Team

Current Members:

  • Liblab, Inc. (Strategic oversight)

Responsibilities:

  • Set project vision and strategic direction
  • Make final decisions on contentious issues
  • Approve major architectural changes
  • Manage project resources and infrastructure

Core Maintainers

Qualifications:

  • Consistent contributions over 6+ months
  • Deep understanding of the codebase
  • Demonstrated good judgment in code reviews
  • Active participation in community discussions

Responsibilities:

  • Review and merge pull requests
  • Triage and respond to issues
  • Make technical implementation decisions
  • Mentor new contributors
  • Maintain code quality standards

Current Core Maintainers:

  • To be updated as the team grows

Contributors

Anyone can become a contributor by:

  • Submitting pull requests
  • Reporting bugs or suggesting features
  • Improving documentation
  • Helping other users in discussions

Responsibilities:

  • Follow the Code of Conduct
  • Adhere to contribution guidelines
  • Test changes before submitting
  • Provide clear descriptions of changes

Decision-Making Processes

1. Standard Changes

  • Scope: Bug fixes, minor features, documentation updates
  • Process: Submit PR → Code review → Merge
  • Approval: One core maintainer approval required

2. Significant Changes

  • Scope: New features, API changes, dependency updates
  • Process: Discussion Issue → RFC (if needed) → Implementation → Review → Merge
  • Approval: Two core maintainer approvals required

3. Major Changes

  • Scope: Architecture changes, breaking changes, new integrations
  • Process: RFC → Community feedback period (1 week) → Leadership approval → Implementation
  • Approval: Project Leadership Team approval required

4. Emergency Changes

  • Scope: Security fixes, critical bugs
  • Process: Immediate implementation with post-facto review
  • Approval: Any core maintainer can approve and merge

RFC (Request for Comments) Process

For significant changes that affect users or the overall architecture:

  1. Create RFC Issue using the RFC template
  2. Community Discussion period (minimum 1 week)
  3. Core Maintainer Review and feedback incorporation
  4. Final Comment Period (72 hours)
  5. Decision by Project Leadership Team
  6. Implementation following standard PR process

Conflict Resolution

Step 1: Direct Discussion

  • Contributors attempt to resolve disagreements through direct discussion
  • Use GitHub Issues for transparency when needed

Step 2: Mediation

  • If direct discussion fails, involve a Core Maintainer
  • Focus on finding compromise and understanding all perspectives

Step 3: Leadership Decision

  • For unresolved conflicts, the Project Leadership Team makes the final decision
  • Decision rationale will be documented and shared publicly

Becoming a Core Maintainer

Path to Core Maintainer Status

  1. Demonstrate Expertise

    • Make significant contributions over 6+ months
    • Show deep understanding of the codebase
    • Provide thoughtful code reviews

  2. Show Leadership

    • Help onboard new contributors
    • Participate actively in technical discussions
    • Demonstrate good judgment in contentious situations

  3. Community Involvement

    • Positive interactions with community members
    • Adherence to Code of Conduct
    • Regular participation in project discussions

Nomination Process

  1. Self-nomination or nomination by current Core Maintainer
  2. Review by existing Core Maintainers
  3. Community feedback period (1 week)
  4. Final approval by Project Leadership Team

Expectations for Core Maintainers

  • Availability: Respond to critical issues within 48 hours
  • Quality: Maintain high standards for code review and contributions
  • Communication: Participate in maintainer discussions and planning
  • Community: Foster a welcoming environment for all contributors

Communication Channels

Primary Channels

  • GitHub Issues: Bug reports, feature requests, technical discussions, and project-related topics
  • GitHub Pull Requests: Code review and implementation discussions
  • Email: community@liblab.ai for general inquiries

Maintainer Channels

  • Maintainer Meetings: As needed for project coordination
  • Private Communication: For sensitive matters requiring confidentiality

Code of Conduct Enforcement

The project follows the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. Enforcement is handled by:

  1. Core Maintainers: First line of response for violations
  2. Project Leadership: Final authority on enforcement actions

Enforcement Actions:

  • Warning
  • Temporary ban from project spaces
  • Permanent ban from project spaces

Project Resources

Infrastructure

  • GitHub Repository: Primary development platform
  • GitHub Actions: CI/CD and automation

Communication

  • GitHub Issues: Bug tracking, feature requests, and discussions
  • Email: community@liblab.ai for general inquiries

Governance Evolution

This governance model will evolve as the project grows:

  • Annual Review: Assess effectiveness and make adjustments
  • Community Input: Regular feedback collection through GitHub Issues
  • Process Improvements: Continuous refinement based on experience

Changes to this governance document require:

  1. RFC process
  2. Community feedback period (2 weeks)
  3. Approval by Project Leadership Team

Legal and Licensing

  • License: MIT License (see LICENSE file)
  • Copyright: Copyright (c) 2024 Liblab, Inc. and liblab.ai contributors
  • Contributor License Agreement: Contributors retain copyright, grant license to use contributions

Contact Information

This governance model is effective as of December 2024 and will be reviewed annually.