Once #30 is implemented, we'll have very verbose names. We should then add a second naming convention (maybe the naming convention definition is best placed in RCMIP and we just use it here...) which provides much shorter output names for convenience.
This follows #31 (comment)
Once #30 is implemented, we'll have very verbose names. We should then add a second naming convention (maybe the naming convention definition is best placed in RCMIP and we just use it here...) which provides much shorter output names for convenience.
This follows #31 (comment)