Skip to content

Commit 4a68dcd

Browse files
committed
Adding blog post
1 parent 974d959 commit 4a68dcd

2 files changed

Lines changed: 65 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 65 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1+
+++
2+
author = "Jason Smith"
3+
title = "🚨 SBOM Signing: The Myths That Are Putting You at Risk 🔥"
4+
date = "2025-06-15"
5+
linkedin = "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/j28smith_sbom-softwaresecurity-supplychainsecurity-activity-7344065612274376704-7laa/"
6+
image = "img/thirdparty/2025-06-15-sbom-signing-myths.jpeg"
7+
+++
8+
9+
"If the SBOM exists, that's enough"
10+
11+
"We'll deal with signing later"
12+
13+
"Too complex to be worth it"
14+
15+
"We only need it for external releases"
16+
17+
"Open source doesn't need this"
18+
19+
👀 I've heard these all before. And they're not just wrong, but they're dangerous to believe.
20+
21+
Let's break them down:
22+
23+
❌ Myth #1: "If the SBOM exists, that's enough"
24+
25+
Just generating an SBOM isn't the endgame, it's the beginning.
26+
27+
An unsigned SBOM is an unauthenticated claim. Without signing, you're just hoping no one tampers with it.
28+
29+
❌ Myth #2: "We'll deal with signing later"
30+
31+
Delaying SBOM signing is like building a house and skipping the locks.
32+
33+
You might be safe for a while... until you're not.
34+
35+
❌ Myth #3: "Too complex to be worth it"
36+
37+
Key management, CI integration, and identity binding can be tricky but these are solvable problems.
38+
39+
If you're already sharing SBOMs for software transparency without integrity protections, complexity isn't your problem. You're prioritizing convenience over trust.
40+
41+
❌ Myth #4: "We only need it for external releases"
42+
43+
Insider threats. Supply chain drift. Misconfigured pipelines.
44+
45+
If you're not protecting internal artifacts, you're assuming your own house is clean. The riskiest threats aren't always outside, sometimes they come from within.
46+
47+
❌ Myth #5: "Open source doesn't need this"
48+
49+
Open source doesn't mean risk-free. Unsigned SBOMs leave the door wide open for supply chain attacks.
50+
51+
Signing puts a lock on that door.
52+
53+
💥 The truth?
54+
55+
If you're not signing your SBOMs, you're shipping unsigned claims about your software supply chain.
56+
57+
That's like selling a product with no warranty and claiming it's guaranteed.
58+
59+
🧠 It's time to treat SBOMs like first-class security artifacts.
60+
61+
And that means securing them by default.
62+
63+
💬👇 How do you handle SBOM signing today? What friction points have you hit - or solved?
64+
65+
#SBOM #SoftwareSecurity #SupplyChainSecurity #SBOMSigning #DigitalSignatures #PKI #OpenSourceSecurity #DevSecOps #CyberSecurity #SoftwareTransparency
40.8 KB
Loading

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)