I am trying to reproduce the accuracy results of CPT+ that were published on PAKDD paper, but when I run the implementation (as it currently is), the accuracies that I get are way off (for some datasets).
For example SIGN, MSNBC get around 2% and 30% respectively. In the paper for the same datasets CPT+ has accuracies around 33% and 61% respectively.
Could you please provide me the profiles that you used to publish the results of the paper ?
(Sorry if you have done already and I have missed it)
Rafael.
I am trying to reproduce the accuracy results of CPT+ that were published on PAKDD paper, but when I run the implementation (as it currently is), the accuracies that I get are way off (for some datasets).
For example SIGN, MSNBC get around 2% and 30% respectively. In the paper for the same datasets CPT+ has accuracies around 33% and 61% respectively.
Could you please provide me the profiles that you used to publish the results of the paper ?
(Sorry if you have done already and I have missed it)
Rafael.