soundwire: bus: use consistent tests for return values

We use different styles to check the return values of IO related
routines. The majority of the cases use 'if (ret < 0)', align the
remaining cases for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>

Author: plbossart

drivers/soundwire/bus.c

@@ -44,13 +44,13 @@ int sdw_bus_master_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct device *parent,
 	}
 
 	ret = sdw_get_id(bus);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(parent, "Failed to get bus id\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = sdw_master_device_add(bus, parent, fwnode);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(parent, "Failed to add master device at link %d\n",
 			bus->link_id);
 		return ret;
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int sdw_bus_master_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct device *parent,
 	else
 		ret = -ENOTSUPP; /* No ACPI/DT so error out */
 
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(bus->dev, "Finding slaves failed:%d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ sdw_bread_no_pm(struct sdw_bus *bus, u16 dev_num, u32 addr)
 
 	ret = sdw_fill_msg(&msg, NULL, addr, 1, dev_num,
 			   SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ, &buf);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = sdw_transfer(bus, &msg);
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ sdw_bwrite_no_pm(struct sdw_bus *bus, u16 dev_num, u32 addr, u8 value)
 
 	ret = sdw_fill_msg(&msg, NULL, addr, 1, dev_num,
 			   SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE, &value);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	return sdw_transfer(bus, &msg);
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ int sdw_bread_no_pm_unlocked(struct sdw_bus *bus, u16 dev_num, u32 addr)
 
 	ret = sdw_fill_msg(&msg, NULL, addr, 1, dev_num,
 			   SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ, &buf);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = sdw_transfer_unlocked(bus, &msg);
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ int sdw_bwrite_no_pm_unlocked(struct sdw_bus *bus, u16 dev_num, u32 addr, u8 val
 
 	ret = sdw_fill_msg(&msg, NULL, addr, 1, dev_num,
 			   SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE, &value);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	return sdw_transfer_unlocked(bus, &msg);
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ static int sdw_program_device_num(struct sdw_bus *bus)
 				 * dev_num
 				 */
 				ret = sdw_assign_device_num(slave);
-				if (ret) {
+				if (ret < 0) {
 					dev_err(bus->dev,
 						"Assign dev_num failed:%d\n",
 						ret);
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static int sdw_slave_clk_stop_prepare(struct sdw_slave *slave,
 
 	ret = sdw_write_no_pm(slave, SDW_SCP_SYSTEMCTRL, val);
 
-	if (ret != 0)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&slave->dev,
 			"Clock Stop prepare failed for slave: %d", ret);
 
@@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
 	if (status[0] == SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) {
 		dev_dbg(bus->dev, "Slave attached, programming device number\n");
 		ret = sdw_program_device_num(bus);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret < 0)
 			dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave attach failed: %d\n", ret);
 		/*
 		 * programming a device number will have side effects,
@@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
 
 		case SDW_SLAVE_ALERT:
 			ret = sdw_handle_slave_alerts(slave);
-			if (ret)
+			if (ret < 0)
 				dev_err(&slave->dev,
 					"Slave %d alert handling failed: %d\n",
 					i, ret);
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
 			attached_initializing = true;
 
 			ret = sdw_initialize_slave(slave);
-			if (ret)
+			if (ret < 0)
 				dev_err(&slave->dev,
 					"Slave %d initialization failed: %d\n",
 					i, ret);
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
 		}
 
 		ret = sdw_update_slave_status(slave, status[i]);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret < 0)
 			dev_err(&slave->dev,
 				"Update Slave status failed:%d\n", ret);
 		if (attached_initializing) {