chore(evaos): version agent tools for v2.1.36#710
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 27 minutes Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
evaOS review status: completedPR: #710 - chore(evaos): version agent tools for v2.1.36 evaOS review completed for this PR head. Automation note: agents should wait for this comment to reach PR URL: #710 Review URL: #710 (review) |
![evaos-code-review-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/4184532?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Walkthrough
PR: #710 - chore(evaos): version agent tools for v2.1.36
Head: 28064de5b1418151c94a52f6175fbd1d5dc6073c into evaos/beta-rc-20260612. Review event: COMMENT.
Provider: GLM/Z.ai through ZCode (zcode-glm, zcode, model GLM-5.2).
Estimated review effort: 1/5 (~10 min)
Changed Files
| File | Status | Churn | Purpose | Risk |
|---|
Review Signal
No validated inline findings.
Dropped findings before posting: 0. High-severity findings: 0.
Risk Taxonomy
No finding categories.
Validation and Proof
1 required validation/proof recommendation(s) selected from changed files.
- required: TypeScript/web build or CI proof - Runtime TypeScript/web files or package/config files changed. Proof: npm run build; typecheck; focused Vitest; green GitHub check.
Proof status: sufficient - PR metadata mentions acceptable proof for each required validation recommendation.
Profile validation hints: Do not ask for broad local suites when remote CI or fast-smoke proof is the right gate.
Profile proof expectations: Look for focused app smoke, packaged resource checks, or CI artifact proof when relevant.
Related Context
Related issues/PRs: #709, #698, #707, #623.
Suggested labels: none.
Suggested reviewers: none from current metadata.
Review Settings Preview
- Profile: assertive
- Enabled sections: Review summary (inline_review); Walkthrough (inline_review); Changed-files table (walkthrough); Effort estimate (walkthrough); Related issues/PRs (walkthrough); Suggested labels (suggestion_only); Review status comment (sticky_status)
- Path instructions:
apps/eva-desktop-mac/**- Check macOS identity, helper path, TCC identity, and packaged resource shape risk. - Path instructions:
scripts/**- Treat release, packaging, and artifact-shape changes as high risk. - Label suggestions: workbench, macos, regression-hardening
- Reviewer suggestions: none
- Suggestion behavior: suggestions only; labels and reviewers are not auto-applied.
- Roadmap-only settings: auto-apply labels; auto-request reviewers; required status checks
Pre-merge checklist
- Inline comments target current RIGHT-side diff lines.
- No secret-like content survived into posted inline comments.
- REQUEST_CHANGES is only used when eligible P0/P1 findings survive validation.
- Required behavior proof is present or not applicable.
- Labels and reviewers are suggestions only; the bot did not auto-apply them.
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
1 participant
Summary
0.2.0to0.2.1dist, macOS helper/bundle identities, and Workbench version unchangedWhy this is release-critical
The immutable
evaos-desktop-bridge-openclaw-v0.2.0tag resolves to the pre-#709 GUI commit. The v2.1.36 verifier correctly binds both the immutable component tag and the whole vendored bridge source digest to the exact Workbench candidate commit. Although the agent-tools subtree itself did not change, #709 changed the surrounding bridge source, so the old component tag cannot safely attest the current release head.This metadata-only patch creates a clean superseding GUI commit that can be immutably tagged as
evaos-desktop-bridge-openclaw-v0.2.1for the isolated staging rollout and exact-head Mac-control canary.Validation
npm testinresources/evaos-beta/bridge/agent-tools/openclaw-plugin: 37 tests passednode scripts/evaosBetaReleaseGate.js audit-config: passedgit diff --check: passedBoundaries
Release tracker: #623