Extract the duplicated positive integer field validation into a shared helper#187
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
solid — in it goes 🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #96
Summary
This PR consolidates the repeated numeric validation logic used across multiple forms into a single reusable utility. The new helper provides a consistent, typed interface for validating integer inputs while preserving the existing validation rules and user-facing behavior.
The change reduces duplication, improves maintainability, and increases confidence through dedicated unit tests.
Problem
Numeric validation was implemented independently in multiple locations:
src/app/services/new/page.tsxsrc/app/services/[serviceId]/edit/page.tsxsrc/app/usage/page.tsxAlthough the validation requirements differ slightly between forms, the underlying parse-and-validate logic was largely duplicated.
This duplication increases maintenance overhead and creates the risk of validation behavior drifting over time.
Solution
Introduced a shared validation utility:
The helper exposes typed validation functions that return structured results:
or
This approach centralizes validation logic while allowing each form to preserve its existing acceptance criteria.
Changes
New Validation Utility
Created:
src/lib/validateNumber.tsAdded:
parseNonNegativeInt()parsePositiveInt()Features:
Form Updates
Updated:
src/app/services/new/page.tsxsrc/app/services/[serviceId]/edit/page.tsxsrc/app/usage/page.tsxChanges include:
Replacing inline validation logic with shared helper functions
Preserving existing accepted ranges:
priceStroops):>= 0>= 1Maintaining existing submission behavior and payload structure
Surfacing validation errors through existing
TextFielderror propsTesting
Added:
src/lib/__tests__/validateNumber.test.tsUpdated affected page tests to verify:
Edge Cases Covered
Validation tests include:
Validation
Executed:
npm run lint npm run typecheck npm test npm run buildAcceptance Criteria
Benefits