Skip to content

test: add test for MIG mixed mode#8249

Merged
ganeshkumarashok merged 1 commit intomainfrom
runzhen/mig2
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

test: add test for MIG mixed mode#8249
ganeshkumarashok merged 1 commit intomainfrom
runzhen/mig2

Conversation

@runzhen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@runzhen runzhen commented Apr 8, 2026

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add a test case for MIG mixed mode.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds an e2e scenario to validate NVIDIA MIG mixed strategy behavior (resource-type-specific advertising like nvidia.com/mig-1g.10gb) on Ubuntu 24.04 GPU nodes, and updates the shared GPU scheduling validator to work with arbitrary GPU resource names.

Changes:

  • Extend ValidateGPUWorkloadSchedulable to accept a resourceName parameter and use it for both readiness wait and pod resource limits.
  • Update existing GPU e2e scenarios to pass "nvidia.com/gpu" explicitly.
  • Add a new Ubuntu 24.04 MIG Mixed scenario that validates MIG instance creation, resource advertising for nvidia.com/mig-1g.10gb, and workload schedulability.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
e2e/validators.go Generalize GPU workload scheduling validator to support MIG-specific resource names.
e2e/scenario_gpu_managed_experience_test.go Update validator call sites and add a new MIG Mixed scenario covering MIG resource advertising + scheduling.
e2e/scenario_gpu_daemonset_test.go Update daemonset scenario to use the new validator signature.

Comment thread e2e/scenario_gpu_managed_experience_test.go
@ganeshkumarashok ganeshkumarashok merged commit a61b49a into main Apr 8, 2026
32 of 35 checks passed
@ganeshkumarashok ganeshkumarashok deleted the runzhen/mig2 branch April 8, 2026 17:26
timmy-wright pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants