Fixed missing leafref linking#2424
Merged
Merged
Conversation
michalvasko
requested changes
Sep 17, 2025
Member
michalvasko
left a comment
michalvasko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No problem, just minor issues.
This patch fixes the problem of missing leafref linking in case of using leafref within union types
steweg
force-pushed
the
bugfix/leafref_link_union
branch
from
03ebf07 to
7a49388
Compare
michalvasko
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2025
michalvasko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2025
This patch fixes the problem of missing leafref linking in case of using leafref within union types
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch fixes the problem of missing leafref linking in case of using leafref within union types