Simple Galaxy Gate: Updated ABG gate IDs to reverse order (Gamma → Beta → Alpha).

[do-gamer]

Summary by Sourcery

Reverse the configured ABG gate ID order and clarify ABG-related comments to better reflect the special handling of these gates.

Enhancements:

• Reverse the ABG gate ID list to prioritize Gamma over Beta and Alpha when resolving gate access.
• Improve documentation comments around ABG gate handling to describe wildcard behavior and accessibility checks more accurately.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Reorders the ABG gate IDs to iterate Gamma → Beta → Alpha instead of Alpha → Beta → Gamma, and clarifies comments to reflect that ABG IDs are treated as a special wildcard group for map lookup and travel routing.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Reordered ABG gate ID list to change the priority of ABG gate traversal from Alpha-first to Gamma-first and updated associated comments for clarity.	Changed ABG_IDS constant values from List.of(51, 52, 53) to List.of(53, 52, 51) to reverse the traversal order. Updated the comment for ABG_IDS to document the new Gamma, Beta, Alpha ID ordering. Clarified the comment in findMapInfo to describe map ID 0 as a special wildcard case for ABG gates. Adjusted the comment in getMapForTravel to describe that the loop checks for any accessible ABG gate from the current map rather than implying a specific Alpha/Beta/Gamma order.	src/main/java/dev/shared/do_gamer/module/simple_galaxy_gate/config/Maps.java src/main/java/dev/shared/do_gamer/module/simple_galaxy_gate/SimpleGalaxyGate.java

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:

• If the iteration order of ABG_IDS is now significant (Gamma → Beta → Alpha), consider either renaming the constant or expanding the comment to state explicitly that the list is ordered by priority to make this dependency clear to future readers.
• The special handling for map ID 0 as an ABG wildcard is currently split between Maps and SimpleGalaxyGate; consider centralizing this logic (e.g., a helper in Maps) so the behavior for ID 0 cannot drift between call sites.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- If the iteration order of `ABG_IDS` is now significant (Gamma → Beta → Alpha), consider either renaming the constant or expanding the comment to state explicitly that the list is ordered by priority to make this dependency clear to future readers.
- The special handling for map ID 0 as an ABG wildcard is currently split between `Maps` and `SimpleGalaxyGate`; consider centralizing this logic (e.g., a helper in `Maps`) so the behavior for ID 0 cannot drift between call sites.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="src/main/java/dev/shared/do_gamer/module/simple_galaxy_gate/config/Maps.java" line_range="35" />
<code_context>
     }

-    public static final List<Integer> ABG_IDS = List.of(51, 52, 53); // Alpha, Beta, Gamma gate IDs
+    public static final List<Integer> ABG_IDS = List.of(53, 52, 51); // Gamma, Beta, Alpha gate IDs
     private static List<MapInfo> ggMaps;
     private static double mapCenterX = Defaults.MAP_CENTER_X;
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Reversing ABG_IDS ordering may break any callers that rely on positional semantics instead of set membership.

Any positional access like `ABG_IDS.get(0)` will now return Gamma instead of Alpha. In this file you only use `contains`, so order doesn’t matter here, but please either (a) rename this to make the ordering/priority explicit (e.g. `ABG_PRIORITY_ORDER`), or (b) search for and verify any index-based uses of `ABG_IDS` elsewhere still behave correctly after this change.
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[do-gamer]

@dm94 Tested and ready to merge.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud