You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Update documentation to reflect 2D multi-level graph approach
- Replace 3D spherical model with hierarchical graph navigation
- Update priority system to focus on visibility and resource allocation
- Change positioning from spherical coordinates to multi-level graph structure
- Update diagrams to show Strategic > Project > Feature > Task hierarchy
- Reflect current 2D implementation with dynamic levels of detail
- Remove outdated spherical terminology throughout documentation
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ Visit http://localhost:3000 to see the working application!
68
68
### Graph Structure
69
69
Work is modeled as interconnected **nodes** (outcomes, tasks, milestones) connected by **edges** (dependencies, relationships). Contributors—both human and AI—participate as first-class citizens in this graph.
70
70
71
-
### Spherical Priority Model
72
-
Items exist in 3D space where priority determines distance from center. High-priority work gets full resources at the center, while experimental ideas start at the periphery with minimal resources, migrating inward as they prove value.
71
+
### Multi-Level Graph Navigation
72
+
Work is organized in interconnected graphs at different levels of detail. Browse from strategic goals at the top level down through projects, features, and individual tasks. The system dynamically shows the appropriate level of detail based on what you're exploring.
73
73
74
74
### Democratic Prioritization
75
75
Anyone can propose ideas and assign personal priority. The community validates through anonymous rating. Ideas that gain support naturally migrate toward higher priority and more resources—no executive approval required.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/detailed-overview.md
+62-51Lines changed: 62 additions & 51 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -36,41 +36,53 @@ graph TD
36
36
end
37
37
```
38
38
39
-
### The Spherical Priority Model
39
+
### Multi-Level Graph Navigation
40
40
41
-
Work items exist in a 3D spherical space where priority determines distance from center. This creates natural resource allocation and visibility.
41
+
Work is organized as interconnected graphs at different levels of detail. Users can navigate from high-level strategic goals down through projects and features to individual tasks, with the system dynamically showing appropriate detail levels.
Each node has three priority dimensions that combine into a computed priority determining its position in the sphere.
156
+
Each node has three priority dimensions that combine into a computed priority determining its visibility and resource allocation across the graph hierarchy.
145
157
146
158
```mermaid
147
159
graph TB
@@ -155,17 +167,15 @@ graph TB
155
167
C --> CALC
156
168
157
169
CALC --> CP[Computed Priority<br/>0.0 - 1.0]
158
-
CP --> R[Radius = 1 - Priority]
159
-
160
-
R --> POS[Spherical Position<br/>radius, theta, phi]
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/philosophy.md
+8-8Lines changed: 8 additions & 8 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -64,18 +64,18 @@ GraphDone treats AI agents as first-class collaborators in the work graph. Human
64
64
-**Anonymous contribution**: Reduce social pressure while maintaining quality through peer review
65
65
-**Background opportunities**: Even low-priority ideas get resources and visibility
66
66
67
-
## The Spherical Model
67
+
## The Multi-Level Graph Model
68
68
69
-
GraphDone organizes work in a spherical coordinate system where priority determines distance from center:
69
+
GraphDone organizes work as interconnected graphs at different levels of detail where priority determines visibility and resource allocation:
70
70
71
-
-**Center**: Highest priority outcomes with full resource allocation
72
-
-**Inner spheres**: Important work with substantial support
73
-
-**Outer spheres**: Experimental and background projects with idle resources
74
-
-**Periphery**: New ideas and personal initiatives with minimal but real support
71
+
-**Strategic Level**: High-level goals and vision with maximum visibility
72
+
-**Project Level**: Major initiatives and features with substantial resources
73
+
-**Feature Level**: Specific capabilities and components with focused attention
74
+
-**Task Level**: Individual work items with targeted effort
75
75
76
-
Ideas migrate inward through demonstrated value and community support. This creates a natural innovation pipeline where breakthrough concepts can prove themselves organically rather than requiring initial executive buy-in.
76
+
Ideas gain visibility and resources through demonstrated value and community support. This creates a natural innovation pipeline where breakthrough concepts can prove themselves organically rather than requiring initial executive buy-in.
77
77
78
-
Executives and managers influence the system by placing "priority flags" that create gravity wells, but they don't control the entire structure. Individual contributors can always establish their own small gravity wells on the periphery.
78
+
Executives and managers influence the system by setting strategic priorities that cascade through the levels, but they don't control the entire structure. Individual contributors can always create new nodes at any level and let the community validate their importance.
0 commit comments