Skip to content

kb init(jiuwenswarm): modules - #275

Merged
tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/init-jiuwenswarm-modules
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/init-jiuwenswarm-modules

Conversation

@tzhouam

@tzhouam tzhouam commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

kb init stage modules for jiuwenswarm (openJiuwen-ai/jiuwenswarm).

  • Upstream pin: f0a69728c96b5961d993449f1a901cbd2f4dac5b
  • Knowledge base: 7386f28c4d8b91a7d28567cb942dcc66daca02bb
  • Model spend (accounted): $3.40

Human-merged. Rules were screened by the docs redundancy filter, checked at the pin, and given an advisory verdict; fail rules are already removed.

Coverage:

metric before after
modules routed 57.5% 100.0%

Notes:

  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/: entry_points 'jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/desktop_app.py' is not offered; left out
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/: key_files 'jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/desktop_app.py' is not offered; left out
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/: key_files 'jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/desktop_app.py' is not offered; left out
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/: key_files 'jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/desktop_app.py' is not offered; left out
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/: key_files 'jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/desktop_app.py' is not offered; left out
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/: key_files 'jiuwenswarm/channels/desktop/desktop_app.py' is not offered; left out
  • module jiuwenswarm/common/config_panel/: key_files 'jiuwenswarm/common/config_panel/config_set_handlers.py' is not offered; left out

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-30T21:12:38.942652Z 2f75216 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@tzhouam
tzhouam merged commit 0207a25 into main Sep 30, 2026
2 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2f75216598

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


| PR 描述在做什么 | 精确规则 | 第一批 live 源码 |
|---|---|---|
| runtime、AgentRuntime、session create/switch/fork、session.delete、plan mode、model… | 入口 | `jiuwenswarm/runtime/agent_definition.py`、`jiuwenswarm/runtime/context.py`、`jiuwenswarm/runtime/events.py` |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Add submodule-specific rows to the Direct map

For a review changing only jiuwenswarm/runtime/session/coordinator.py, direct_review_plan returns this agent-runtime route with quick_map_status="ok" and read_required=false, but the sole row directs the reviewer to three unrelated top-level runtime files and never exposes either the coordinator or the linked session page. Direct review policy consumes only the embedded map when its status is OK, so session changes lose the source guidance this commit intends to add; the same one-row pattern affects the multi-submodule common-core, launch, extensions, and Symphony owners. Add prefix/subtopic-specific rows that expose the appropriate child page and live sources.

AGENTS.md reference: knowledge/AGENTS.md:L16-L16

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +12 to +15
- [启动与多实例管理](launch/_index.md)
- [Gateway 与频道](gateway-channels/_index.md)
- [公共基础模块与配置](common-core/_index.md)
- [登录鉴权与免费模型](login-auth/_index.md)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Populate the required component-index context

This new components/_index.md is only a list of links, and the newly added owner indexes similarly contain links plus a generated Direct block. The applicable page contract requires every index to explain when to consult it, what is excluded, and when each entry applies; component indexes must additionally identify source paths, responsibility/input-output boundaries, test entry points, and affected upper-level features. Without that context these pages cannot establish the owner boundaries expected by the knowledge tree, even though the structural validators accept them.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L7-L11

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.


**从哪里开始读**

- `jiuwenswarm/runtime/session/coordinator.py` — RuntimeSessionCoordinator 是对外入口,提供 register_session、run_unary/submit_unary、run_stream、deliver_control、cancel_execution、c

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore the truncated architecture descriptions

This entry ends mid-identifier at c, so readers cannot tell which coordinator operation was intended. The same generation truncation appears in common-core/jiuwenswarm-common-config-panel.md (skill retriev) and symphony-orchestration/jiuwenswarm-symphony-evolution.md (a sentence ending after a comma); restore all three sentence endings before publishing these pages as architecture guidance.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant