Skip to content

knowledge(vllm-omni): 2 change(s) from refine - #394

Merged
tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-refine-c4e569cf99e7
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-refine-c4e569cf99e7

Conversation

@tzhouam

@tzhouam tzhouam commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Generated automatically by the Copilot knowledge service (changeset vllm-omni-refine-c4e569cf99e7).

op page rule
add repos/vllm-omni/models/qwen-image/rules.md VLLM-OMNI-PR9272-QWEN21-IDLE-KV-GRAPHS
add repos/vllm-omni/models/minimax-h3/rules-audio-vae-determinism.md VLLM-OMNI-PR8802-AUDIO-JIT-DETERMINISM

Generator: zcode:GLM-5.3 · judge: codex:gpt-6-sol:medium.
The publisher merges it only if its local gate passes on the exact merge result.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-23T04:59:27.081017Z 9200758 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@tzhouam
tzhouam merged commit 3b7d1a2 into main Oct 23, 2026
3 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 920075852f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

updated: 2026-10-23
type: rule
tags: [vllm-omni, models, diffusion]
sources: ["PR #8802"]

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Defer the audio rule until its source PR merges

The knowledge-service source contract in doc/architecture/SPEC/kb_service.md:92-96 limits PR evidence to merged PRs, but the new page's only source, upstream PR #8802, is still open as of this snapshot. Publishing its proposed optimized_execution(False) implementation as an active rule can make future reviews enforce branch-only behavior that may change or never reach main; keep this out of the active knowledge tree until the PR is merged.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

type: rule
tags: [vllm-omni, models, diffusion]
sources: ["PR #5887", tests/e2e/accuracy/test_qwen_image.py, "PR #6110", vllm_omni/diffusion/models/qwen_image/qwen_image_transformer.py, "PR #5586", "PR #7513", "PR #8699"]
sources: ["PR #5887", tests/e2e/accuracy/test_qwen_image.py, "PR #6110", vllm_omni/diffusion/models/qwen_image/qwen_image_transformer.py, "PR #5586", "PR #7513", "PR #8699", "PR #9272"]

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Defer the decode-graph rule until its source PR merges

The knowledge-service source contract in doc/architecture/SPEC/kb_service.md:92-96 limits PR evidence to merged PRs, while the newly appended source, upstream PR #9272, is currently open. The added active rule therefore treats proposed symbols and lifecycle behavior such as release_idle_entries as established knowledge before they exist on upstream main, which can misroute subsequent reviews if the patch changes or closes; ingest it only after merge.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant