Skip to content

knowledge(vllm-omni): 1 change(s) from intake - #410

Merged
tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-intake-11da117e84e2
Oct 24, 2026
Merged

tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-intake-11da117e84e2

Conversation

@tzhouam

@tzhouam tzhouam commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Generated automatically by the Copilot knowledge service (changeset vllm-omni-intake-11da117e84e2).

op page rule
add repos/vllm-omni/models/qwen3-tts/rules.md VLLM-OMNI-PR9320-ROCM-SELECT-PREFLIGHT

Generator: zcode:GLM-5.3 · judge: codex:gpt-6-sol:medium.
The publisher merges it only if its local gate passes on the exact merge result.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-24T17:07:23.871198Z 69bb4f9 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 69bb4f9303

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +263 to +265
## VLLM-OMNI-PR9320-ROCM-SELECT-PREFLIGHT — AMD CI GPU lane 必须用显式 ROCm 选择器并预检精确收集数

- 触发:修改 `.buildkite/amd/test-amd-ready.yml` / `test-amd-merge.yml` 的 GPU lane pytest 选择器、`.buildkite/amd/scripts/assert-pytest-collection.sh`、`tests/buildkite/` 的 lane 断言,或测试文件上的 `rocm`/`cuda`/`nvidia_only`/`MI325`/`cards_N` 平台标记与 `tests/helpers/tests/test_check_test_marks.py` 的静态标记检查。

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Route the cross-model AMD lane contract to the CI owner

For changes to AMD pipeline selectors or shared marker validation, this rule is stored under the wrong owner: its trigger covers shared Buildkite infrastructure and multiple models, not Qwen3-TTS implementation. The repository’s routing table sends Buildkite/hardware-lane reviews to ci/rules.md, while existing AMD pipeline contracts live in rules-amd-ci.md; neither routes readers to this new section. Consequently, CI-focused reviews following the prescribed owner-scoped navigation will miss the new collection and marker safeguards. Move the shared contract to the CI/AMD owner and update its routing, retaining only model-specific constraints or a link here. This violates the nearest-owner requirement in root AGENTS.md.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L12-L17

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@tzhouam
tzhouam merged commit 7add596 into main Oct 24, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant