Skip to content

knowledge(vllm-omni): 1 change(s) from intake - #415

Merged
tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-intake-db1920b95c83
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-intake-db1920b95c83

Conversation

@tzhouam

@tzhouam tzhouam commented Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Generated automatically by the Copilot knowledge service (changeset vllm-omni-intake-db1920b95c83).

op page rule
add repos/vllm-omni/components/serving/rules-minicpmo-attn-compare.md VLLM-OMNI-PR9344-MINICPM-ATTN-COMPARE

Generator: zcode:GLM-5.3 · judge: codex:gpt-6-sol:medium.
The publisher merges it only if its local gate passes on the exact merge result.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T09:41:40.143250Z 28fb676 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 28fb6768be

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +12 to +14
## VLLM-OMNI-PR9344-MINICPM-ATTN-COMPARE — MiniCPM-o 注意力后端对比:出货 profile 不锁定 CUDA Thinker 后端,实验走仅改 stage 0 的 overlay

- 触发:改动 `docs/serving/realtime_duplex_api.md` 的 `#### Compare MiniCPM-o attention backends` 小节,或 MiniCPM-o 部署 profile(如 `vllm_omni/deploy/minicpmo_4_5.yaml` 及其变体)中 CUDA stage 的 `attention_backend` 取值,或 `tests/model_executor/models/minicpmo_4_5/test_pipeline.py` 对部署 profile 的结构断言;也覆盖以采样 transcript 差异主张注意力后端缺陷、或以 `response.done` 成功主张识别质量的评审证据。

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Move the MiniCPM-o-specific rule to its model owner

This rule applies exclusively to MiniCPM-o deployment profiles, backend comparisons, and model-specific tests, but its sole index entry places it under the shared serving component. The existing owner is models/minicpm-o-4-5/, where rules-duplex.md already maintains shipping-profile attention and configuration constraints. Keeping this page under serving splits that model contract across unrelated owners and leaves it absent from the model's own knowledge entrypoints. Move the rule to that model owner and update its nearest index. Root AGENTS.md explicitly requires that “model-specific rules stay with that model owner.”

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L12-L14

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@tzhouam
tzhouam merged commit 2feddd6 into main Oct 25, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant