[Dong1017]

Governing Issue and delivery slice

Refs #149. Refs #91. Evaluation plan: #88.

LoopX's readable Goal/Todo views, next-action decision and local settlement
receipts answer different questions. Treating a projection as authority or a
replayed accounting effect as proof of external execution can authorize the
wrong work or duplicate an uncertain effect. This change distills the bounded
f094b2cfb2acde7a4a0d4d875bba52f64ac31ba9 source into the existing
rsi-evidence owner, with a thin optimization-search-policy reference.

• Accepted scope / delegation: the human-authorized source knowledge task
  in [Task] Distill LoopX goal authority and quota decision boundaries #149, under [Tracking] SearchSpace distillation coverage and knowledge consolidation #91, with the existing native owner/candidate/catalog contracts.
• Delivered: byte-authenticated source ledger and original notices; provider authority
  versus Markdown/index distinctions; Python/TypeScript decision ownership and
  guard order; missing-state, budget/capability/workspace/terminal cases; effect
  identity, semantic digest, preview, commit repair versus replay lookup,
  exact-Goal admission and external-effect limits; both maintained matrices and
  native navigation/projection updates.
• Boundary: source-derived candidate, empirical not_run, agent efficacy
  not evaluated. No LoopX installation/runtime, controller/checkpoint
  implementation, paid agent evaluation, hardware qualification or external
  exactly-once / supplier hard cost-cap claim. RFC [RFC] Goal checkpoints: explicit progress and next actions across agent sessions #137's historical
  a6f28057b49fe03bb234fa6ce1bac5d61df0c58f reference is preserved.

Current integration and validation

The branch integrates canonical main a4a0fbd62defe2bc53ab090e1fa50bd7139663a6. Source commit eadb4f7d9c49789f0e38ff18b7b4651c793bd950 retains the original LoopX source resources and all main canonical changes; current head 76fae92ecad1cece63a5438cedaca470ceb9fb65 changes only generated projections from that committed source.

Stock generation and its single consistency check passed. All 275 registered inputs and 60 generated discovery records match committed source bytes. Real checkout, package, declared-reference and bounded context reads passed: the mechanisms resource remains 16,696 bytes, context uses 65,370/65,536 bytes, and the cross-skill reference returns the original 4,690-byte owner README. All three original notices and revision/path refusal boundaries retain their checked behavior. These local package reads do not establish a clean installed wheel.

Independent current-head review and Ready results are recorded below in the current-head checks. LoopX runtime, model/device, quality/performance and agent-effect evaluation remain not_run.

Changed artifacts and evidence

Requirement	Actual artifact	Check / evidence	Remaining gap
Fixed source, actual readset and license	workflows/rsi-evidence/references/loopx-goal-governance/source-ledger.json, LICENSE, NOTICE.md, LICENSE-MIT.md	Source raw bytes authenticated to fixed Git tree blobs; three original notices retained byte-for-byte	No full repository/provider audit
Authority, decision order and failure/recovery cases	Same owner's mechanisms.md, decision-cases.md, README.md; thin existing skill entries	Explicit code/document/test/deduction distinctions; source-support mapping and static links/anchors/table checks	Upstream tests inspected, not executed; runtime/efficacy not_run
Existing ownership and coverage	Native library navigation, declared cross-skill reference and both matrices	Original maintained lines/metadata preserved; no new root or registry ID; no new measured/green resource cell	No automatic candidate promotion
Native discovery and resources	Generated catalog bound to real source commit eadb4f7d9c49789f0e38ff18b7b4651c793bd950; existing package/checkout readers	Native generator and --check passed; actual declared-reference, checkout/package/context resource bytes, hashes, revisions and refusal boundaries checked	Clean installed-package and final ready checks belong to the final integration gate

Evaluation plan under #88

Status: not_run / not evaluated. These are proposed source-supported cases,
not measured agent outcomes. No model execution is authorized by this PR.

For the existing skills, compare the baseline owner/resource bundle against the
final updated bundle using #88's old versus new mode. For the new LoopX
reference, additionally distinguish without this reference versus with it;
this is a reference exposure contrast, not a new skill ID. Report discovery
cases separately from cases that explicitly provide the reference. Passing both
sides does not demonstrate an incremental benefit.

Proposed case	Independent correctness conditions to freeze before execution
Missing Goal state despite visible recommendation and budget	No invented Goal/intent or new delivery; identify scoped missing-state health and its recovery boundary
Readable stale Markdown with unavailable provider, then a valid empty provider snapshot	Failure is not empty; neither Markdown nor audit log becomes Todo authority; empty alone is not terminal completion
Capability repair plus workspace guard; nonterminal prompt upgrade plus inbox; terminal-source inbox exception	Preserve the source's conditional action/lane ordering instead of treating should_run as generic delivery permission
Same effect with equal request, changed semantic request and a separate effect from stale index basis	Distinguish replay/repair, identity conflict and CAS conflict; do not change identity/basis to force admission
Prepared receipt with missing artifact versus conflicting artifact or truncated unrelated index row	Repeat original commit only for supported repair; distinguish lookup-only replay and reject unsupported repair
Retired nonempty Todo event source and uncertain external effect without receipt	Preserve/refuse retired source; no silent Markdown fallback or automatic deletion/re-execution; no external exactly-once or provider hard-cap claim

An evaluator independent of material authorship must freeze the final old/new
content and resource revisions, task inputs and independently checked expected
answers/grader before execution. Use the same model/settings, environment,
tasks and grader, fresh sessions and balanced order. Freeze trial count, token
and cost ceilings and obtain explicit revision-bound execution authorization;
those values are intentionally unselected here. Report every fix, regression,
unchanged result, uncovered case and runner/grader error with outputs. A later
revision requires reassessment and fresh authorization, not relabeling old
results. Packaging/source checks are not this agent-effect evaluation.

Knowledge authorship declaration

Current-head verification at 76fae92ecad1cece63a5438cedaca470ceb9fb65: an independent gpt-6.1-sol/ultra review found no actionable issues. All four Ready jobs (Python 3.10/3.11 full checks and clean installed-package checks) and lint-and-smoke passed. The automatic evaluation-report publisher failed with HTTP 403 from the GitHub API; its execution job was skipped. Declaration compliance is a separate status in the current-head checks.

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "head_sha": "76fae92ecad1cece63a5438cedaca470ceb9fb65",
  "human_only": false,
  "material_ai_authors": [
    {
      "tool": "Codex",
      "model_id": "gpt-6.1-sol",
      "effort": "max",
      "role": "author"
    }
  ]
}

Maintainers retain Issue-level acceptance. Related engineering #137 and tracking #91 retain their separate acceptance tracks.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-26T08:27:54.250461Z	76fae92	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[Dong1017]

LGTM for #149's bounded source-derived knowledge slice at 678230671a885655363982b3d3a92eca19ef11f0, reported base ea7ab7dae50c8c943fac54ca4a16b58f4402ab67. Not merge-ready: current main integration is conflicted (mergeable=false / dirty). Reconcile main and refresh integrated-head projection/package evidence before merge.

Reviewed changed paths, #149 scope and prior comments, and checked the pinned LoopX f094b2cfb2acde7a4a0d4d875bba52f64ac31ba9 readset. All 30 source-ledger Git blob IDs match that tree; retained LICENSE, NOTICE and historical MIT text match upstream originals. Sampled authority/provider, ordered TypeScript decision/Python fact adapter, effect/request identity, CAS, receipt repair versus replay lookup, exact GoalRef and accounting boundaries support the documented mechanisms. The material does not promote local accounting to external exactly-once execution or a supplier hard cost cap. Existing owner/cross-reference/metadata routing and generation-source bindings are coherent; no new actionable content finding.

Ready https://github.com/InferMatrixLab/InferRSI/actions/runs/40262301083 has all four full-check/installed-package jobs green; lint passes. Per-head policy has reported success, while historical aggregate declarations is failed on evaluator errors; do not conflate them or describe all CI as green. Head and conflict state were re-read before posting.

Read-only source/static/Git-identity and remote-CI review, not executed LoopX tests, generator, models, hardware, external effects or agent-efficacy trials. Candidate/not_run stays unchanged; this is not #149/#91 goal acceptance. No merge, thread resolution or issue closure.

Reviewer: dot / OpenAI assistant; exact runtime model identifier is not exposed.

[Dong1017]

LGTM for the repaired source/package integration at head 76fae92ecad1cece63a5438cedaca470ceb9fb65, incrementally compared with inspected 678230671a885655363982b3d3a92eca19ef11f0.

The previous dirty integration blocker is cleared (mergeable=true). Source merge eadb4f7d9c49789f0e38ff18b7b4651c793bd950 has the reviewed head and canonical a4a0 main as parents; the final head changes generated projections only. LoopX owner text, source ledger, notices and thin search-policy entry remain unchanged, so the prior upstream audit was not repeated. The 58 unrelated generated records change provenance URL/commit only. No new actionable content/software finding.

All four Ready jobs, lint and current per-head policy pass. The separate Skill Eval publisher fails HTTP 403 (log inspected); execution skipped. That remains an operational follow-up, not evidence of failed LoopX source fidelity or successful efficacy.

Integration boundary: inspected actual main 0c78a7e257dfaa3573b77581a39539e8a3a5da4c; the API base remains a4a0fbd62defe2bc53ab090e1fa50bd7139663a6. Their difference is four disjoint Flare #155 paths. This is a scoped source/software conclusion, not an all-workflows-green, model/hardware efficacy, issue acceptance or merge authorization. Separate Skill Eval publication remains failed and execution skipped; do not treat those as a successful evaluation. No model/device calls, installation or workflow dispatch was performed.