provide an explicit 'match all' index value to SurfaceId#1899
provide an explicit 'match all' index value to SurfaceId#1899brownd1978 wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
|
Hi @brownd1978,
which require these tests: build. @Mu2e/write, @Mu2e/fnalbuild-users have access to CI actions on main. ⌛ The following tests have been triggered for 7320f72: build (Build queue - API unavailable) |
|
☀️ The build tests passed at 7320f72.
N.B. These results were obtained from a build of this Pull Request at 7320f72 after being merged into the base branch at ab8dbf1. For more information, please check the job page here. |
RobMina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are a few other call sites in KKFit.hh, CentralHelixFit_module.cc, and KinematicLineFit_module.cc that should be updated -1 -> allIndices_.
There is a stale comment in SurfaceId.hh "Negative value is a wild card" that should be updated.
The same pattern is also used in EventNtuple (and possibly other repos), which should be updated after this PR lands.
|
Thanks for your comments Rob, I updated the PR. |
|
On second thought, I think changing this to |
Provide an explicit 'match all' value to avoid the implicit 'magic number' value for matching all indices.