chore(ci): BanGD 评审升级到工具 main 最新 (aa60007)#116
Conversation
v1/v1.0.0 tag 仍钉在旧 commit 70740458, 落后于工具仓库 main (已合入对抗式验证、eval 语料、precision cases 等)。将 workflow pin 直接指向 main 最新 aa60007, 让后续 PR 用上新版 bangd。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 51 minutes and 11 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🐯 BanGD 数据库内核评审整体风险:🟢 低 变更总结:这个 PR 属于 CI/CD 层级的工具版本管理变更。它将 BanGD 评审工作流引用的工具 commit 从
未发现需要从架构层面改进的问题。 本次评审消耗 token:共 10675 tokens(输入 4728,输出 1083,缓存命中 4864,缓存写入 0)|维度 [performance, compatibility]|对抗式复核 3 票/条,过滤疑似误报 0 条 |
@
背景
BanDB workflow 此前 pin 在
@70740458 # v1.0.0, 但 BanGD 工具仓库的v1/v1.0.0tag 仍停在该旧 commit, 而工具main已前进到aa60007(合入对抗式验证、eval 语料、precision cases 等 #13–#18)。导致近期 PR(如 #112)用的是旧版 bangd。改动
.github/workflows/bangd-review.yml: pin70740458 (v1.0.0)→aa60007(工具 main 最新)备注
v1/v1.0.0tag 落后于 main, 建议后续在工具仓库重新打 tag, BanDB 再改回 pin tag 更稳。🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@