Revert flood of changes by miratcan#58
Open
PeterN wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
The translations were done using AI under my guidance. I take full responsibility for them. I personally reviewed every page before, and I stand behind the quality of the work. If the concern is that the source English manual is outdated, that's a fair point, but it's a different issue than translation quality, and reverting 306 files at once doesn't distinguish between the two. If there are specific pages or terms you think are wrong, point them out and I'll fix them. Calling it "slop" without pointing to a single example isn't really an evaluation. Can we find a middle ground here, maybe reviewing this page by page instead of a blanket revert? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@miratcan decided to automate changing the wiki with "AI" slop. The original PR was very clearly the work of an "AI" tool.
We do not know if the translations were translated by a human by hand.
We do not know if the translations are correct.
The English manual is known to be out of date, so bulk translating out of date material is not really useful.