You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Separate coastal aggregates and confluence units in HydroBASINS–SWORD FACC validation #233
The adopted bifurcation correction preserves facc_total. Track reference pairing independently of channel allocation.
The read-only delta/tidal audit reconstructed one area/Pfaf-consistent HydroBASINS level-6 feature for all 575 frozen records. Original feature/pour-point join IDs were not retained in the recovered reference CSV. Of 285 misses above 20%, 252 use COAST=1 aggregate polygons. These can combine independent watersheds and multiple pour points; aggregate UP_AREA is not an individual mouth's drainage area. The 28 selected worst cases comprise 23 coastal aggregates and five branch/confluence comparison-unit conflicts.
Example: 44220100015 receives Tonle Sap and Mekong parents. The frozen reference is 88,253.8 km², and the adjacent Mekong unit is 665,658.8 km². Their combined 753,912.6 km² is close to unchanged candidate facc_total 751,289.059 km². This is a diagnostic, not a replacement reference selected by model fit.
Follow-up:
Preserve all 6,262 original rows and raw scores.
Attach feature identity, COAST, pour-point multiplicity and pairing evidence.
Build a separately versioned per-river reference roster from actual pour-point catchments, with pairing rules independent of candidate area.
Continue evaluating facc_total only; never split it or adjust SWORD widths to fit reference areas.
Local evidence: output/facc_detection/conservation_followup_20261026/delta_adoption_audit/references/ and REVIEW.txt. Related: #232. This follow-up does not block adoption of the conservative bifurcation budget correction.
Activity