Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 9 additions & 3 deletions content/generator_construction.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,13 +1,19 @@
---
title: Construction of Generators
description: How to construct a generator from a generating set
author: Martin Brandenburg
authors:
- Martin Brandenburg
- Daniel Schepler
---

## Construction of Generators

::: Lemma
In a category let $S$ be a generating set which is [strongly connected](/category-property/strongly_connected) (between any two objects in $S$ there is a morphism). If the coproduct $U \coloneqq \coprod_{G \in S} G$ exists, then it is a generator.
In a category let $S$ be a generating set which is [strongly connected](/category-property/strongly_connected) (between any two objects in $S$ there is a morphism). If the coproduct $U \coloneqq \coprod_{G \in S} G$ exists, then it is a generator. Moreover, if $S$ is an extremal generating set, then $U$ is an extremal generator.
:::

_Proof._ This is a straight forward generalization of [this result](/category-implication/generator_via_coproduct). We remark that the assumption about $S$ implies that each inclusion $G \to U$ has a left inverse. Now let $f,g : A \rightrightarrows B$ be two morphisms with $f h = g h$ for all $h : U \to A$. If $G \in S$, any morphism $G \to A$ extends to $U$ by our preliminary remark. Thus, $fh = gh$ holds for all $h : G \to A$ and $G \in S$. Since $S$ is a generating set, this implies $f = g$. <span class="qed">$\square$</span>
_Proof._ We remark that the assumption on $S$ implies that each coprojection $i_G : G \to U$ has a left inverse. Now let $f,g : A \rightrightarrows B$ be two morphisms with $f \circ \bar a = g \circ \bar a$ for all $\bar a : U \to A$. If $G \in S$, any morphism $G \to A$ extends to $U$ by our preliminary remark. Thus, $f \circ a = g \circ a$ holds for all morphisms $a : G \to A$ with $G \in S$. Since $S$ is a generating set, this implies $f = g$.

Similarly, for the case where $S$ is an extremal generating set, suppose we have a morphism $f : A \to B$ such that $f \circ {-} : \Hom(U, A) \to \Hom(U, B)$ is a bijection. In particular, because it is injective and $U$ is a generator, we can conclude that $f$ is a monomorphism, so $f \circ {-} : \Hom(G, A) \to \Hom(G, B)$ is injective for each $G \in S$. Now suppose $b \in \Hom(G, B)$ for $G \in S$. Then $b$ extends to a morphism $\bar b : U \to B$. By assumption, there exists $\bar a : U \to A$ such that $f \circ \bar a = \bar b$. Composing with the coprojection $i_G : G \to U$, we see
$$f \circ \bar a \circ i_G = \bar b \circ i_G = b.$$
This shows that $f \circ {-} : \Hom(G, A) \to \Hom(G, B)$ is also surjective for each $G \in S$. Since $S$ is an extremal generating set, this implies $f$ is an isomorphism. <span class="qed">$\square$</span>
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions content/subcategories.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -116,3 +116,9 @@ $$
$$

is a composition of faithful functors, hence faithful. <span class="qed">$\square$</span>

::: Lemma 10
Any fully faithful functor reflects extremal generating sets (and therefore, by duality, it also reflects extremal cogenerating sets). In other words, if $U : \C \to \D$ is a fully faithful functor, and $S$ is a set of objects such that $U(S)$ is an extremal generating set of $\D$, then $S$ is an extremal generating set of $\C$.
:::

_Proof:_ Under the given assumptions, we can factor $\C \to (\Set^+)^S$, $X \mapsto (\Hom_\C(G, X))_{G\in S}$, as being isomorphic to the composition of $U : \C \to D$ followed by $Y \mapsto (\Hom_\D(UG, Y))_{G\in S}$, using the assumption on $U$ to identify $\Hom_\D(UG, UX)$ with $\Hom_C(G, X)$ naturally in $X$. In this composition, the first is fully faithful and therefore also conservative; and the second is assumed to be faithful and conservative. Therefore, the composition is also faithful and conservative. <span class="qed">$\square$</span>
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions content/thin_extremal_generator.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
---
title: Thin Category with an Extremal Generator
description: A result restricting which thin categories can have an extremal generator
author: Daniel Schepler
---

# Thin Category with an Extremal Generator

::: Lemma
Suppose $G$ is an object of a thin category. Then $G$ is an extremal generator if and only if for every object $X$, either $X \cong G$ or every morphism with codomain $X$ is an isomorphism.
:::

_Proof._ ($\Rightarrow$) Since the category is thin, $\Hom(G, X)$ is either a singleton or empty. In the first case, let $f \in \Hom(G, X)$. Then $f \circ {-} : \Hom(G, G) \to \Hom(G, X)$ is automatically a bijection since $\Hom(G, G) = \{ \id_G \}$ is also a singleton, implying that $f$ is an isomorphism.

In the second case, suppose we have a morphism $g : Y \to X$. Then $g \circ {-} : \Hom(G, Y) \to \Hom(G, X)$ is a function with empty codomain, so it is automatically a bijection, implying that $g$ is an isomorphism.

($\Leftarrow$) Since the category is thin, any object is automatically a generator. Now suppose we have a morphism $f : X \to Y$ such that $f \circ {-} : \Hom(G, X) \to \Hom(G, Y)$ is a bijection. Then by assumption, either $Y \cong G$ or every morphism with codomain $Y$ is an isomorphism. In the first case, $\Hom(G, Y)$ is non-empty, so $\Hom(G, X)$ is also non-empty. We also have $\Hom(Y, G)$ is non-empty. Therefore, $\Hom(Y, X)$ is non-empty, and the (necessarily unique) morphism $Y \to X$ is automatically an inverse to $f$. In the second case, $f$ is already a morphism with codomain $Y$ so it is an isomorphism. <span class="qed">$\square$</span>

::: Corollary
For a poset $P$, the corresponding thin category has an extremal generator if and only if $P$ is non-empty and it has at most one non-minimal element. In particular, if this is the case, then either the poset is discrete, in which case any element gives an extremal generator; or otherwise, there is exactly one non-minimal element which is the unique extremal generator.
:::

_Proof._ In a thin category coming from a poset, the condition in the previous lemma that every morphism with codomain $X$ is an isomorphism is equivalent to the corresponding element of the poset being minimal. <span class="qed">$\square$</span>
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/Ab_fg.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: abelian
proof: This follows from the fact for abelian groups and the fact that subgroups of finitely generated abelian groups are also finitely generated.

- property: generator
proof: The group $\IZ$ is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor to $\Set$.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The group $\IZ$ is an extremal generator since it represents the forgetful functor to $\Set$ which is faithful and conservative.

- property: essentially countable
proof: Every finitely generated abelian group is isomorphic to a group of the form $\IZ^n / U$, where $n \in \IN$ and $U$ is a subgroup of $\IZ^n$. Since $\IZ^n$ is Noetherian as a $\IZ$-module, $U$ is finitely generated, hence the category $\Ab_\fg$ has only countably many objects up to isomorphism. Furthermore, for any objects $A \cong \IZ^n / U$ and $B \cong \IZ^m / T$, the hom-set $\Hom(A,B)$ is countable. Indeed, precomposition with the quotient map yields an injection $\Hom(A,B) \hookrightarrow \Hom(\IZ^n, B) \cong B^n$, and $B^n$ is countable.
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/Ban.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ satisfied_properties:
proof: The trivial Banach space $\{0\}$ is a zero object.
check_redundancy: false

- property: cogenerator
proof: The Hahn-Banach theorem implies that $\IC$ is a cogenerator.
- property: extremal cogenerator
proof: >-
The Hahn-Banach theorem implies that $\IC$ is a cogenerator. We claim that it is in fact an extremal cogenerator. Thus, suppose $f : X \to Y$ is a morphism such that ${-} \circ f : \Hom(Y, \IC) \to \Hom(X, \IC)$ is bijective on the underlying sets. Then for any non-zero $x \in X$, by the Hahn-Banach theorem, there exists $\varphi \in X^*$ such that $|\varphi| = 1$ and $\varphi(x) = |x|$. Since $|\varphi| = 1$, we see that $\varphi$ is a morphism $X \to \IC$ in $\Ban$; so by the assumption, there exists a morphism $\psi : Y \to \IC$ such that $\varphi = \psi \circ f$. Therefore, $|x| = |\psi(f(x))| \le |f(x)|$; and conversely, since $f$ is a morphism, $|f(x)| \le |x|$. On the other hand, if $x = 0$, then certainly $|f(x)| = |x| = 0$. This shows that $f$ is isometric and therefore a regular monomorphism (see below). On the other hand, since $\IC$ is a cogenerator and ${-} \circ f$ is injective, we have $f$ is also an epimorphism. Hence, $f$ is an isomorphism.

- property: CIP
proof: This is immediate from the concrete description of coproducts and products.
Expand Down
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/Cat.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -27,8 +27,11 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: semi-strongly connected
proof: Every non-empty category is weakly terminal (by using constant functors).

- property: generator
proof: 'The <a href="/category/walking_morphism">walking morphism</a> $I$ is a generator: Assume that $F,G : \C \rightrightarrows \D$ are functors that agree when being precomposed with any functor from $I$. This means that $F(f) = G(f)$ for all morphisms $f : X \to Y$ in $\C$. By comparing the domains and applying this to $f = \id_X$, we see that $F(X) = G(X)$ for all objects $X$. And we just saw that $F,G$ also agree on morphisms.'
- property: extremal generator
proof: >-
The <a href="/category/walking_morphism">walking morphism</a> $I$ is a generator: Assume that $F,G : \C \rightrightarrows \D$ are functors that agree when being precomposed with any functor from $I$. This means that $F(f) = G(f)$ for all morphisms $f : X \to Y$ in $\C$. By comparing the domains and applying this to $f = \id_X$, we see that $F(X) = G(X)$ for all objects $X$. And we just saw that $F,G$ also agree on morphisms.

In fact, $I$ is an extremal generator: suppose $F : \C \to \D$ is a functor which induces a bijection $\Mor(\C) \to \Mor(\D)$. By considering the images of identity morphisms in $\C$, we see that $F$ is injective on objects; and then by considering the preimages of identity morphisms in $\D$, we see that $F$ is surjective on objects. By assumption, $F$ is also bijective on morphisms, so $F$ is an isomorphism of categories.

- property: infinitary extensive
proof: '[Sketch] This is straight forward from the fact that <a href="/category/Set">$\Set$</a> is infinitary extensive: A functor $\C \to \coprod_i \D_i$ yields full subcategories $\C_i \subseteq \C$ (the preimages of $\D_i)$ with $\C = \coprod_i \C_i$.'
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions database/data/categories/Delta.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: strongly connected
proof: For all $n,m$ there are morphisms $[n] \to [0] \to [m]$.

- property: generator
proof: The ordered set $[0] = \{0\}$ is a generator.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The ordered set $[1] = \{0 < 1\}$ is an extremal generator, even for <a href="/category/PreOrd">$\PreOrd$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: cogenerator
proof: The ordered set $[1] = \{0 < 1\}$ is a cogenerator, even for <a href="/category/Pos">$\Pos$</a>.
- property: extremal cogenerator
proof: The ordered set $[1] = \{0 < 1\}$ is an extremal cogenerator, even for <a href="/category/Pos">$\Pos$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: skeletal
proof: 'If $f : [n] \to [m]$ is an isomorphism, then $n + 1 = m + 1$ by comparing the cardinalities, hence $n = m$.'
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/FI.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: left cancellative
proof: This is trivial.

- property: generator
proof: The one-point set is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor $\FI \to \Set$.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The one-point set is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor $\FI \to \Set$, which is faithful and conservative.

- property: essentially countable
proof: Every finite set is isomorphic to some $\{1,\dotsc,n\}$ for some $n \in \IN$.
Expand Down
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/FS.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: right cancellative
proof: This is trivial.

- property: cogenerator
proof: 'We prove that $\{0,1\}$ is a cogenerator: The surjective maps $X \to \{0,1\}$ correspond to the non-empty proper subsets of $X$. If $a,b \in X$ are elements that have the same image under each surjective map $X \to \{0,1\}$, it therefore means that they lie in the same non-empty proper subsets of $X$. This implies $a=b$: If $X = \{a\}$, this is trivial. Otherwise, use the subset $\{a\}$.'
- property: extremal cogenerator
proof: >-
We prove that $\{0,1\}$ is an extremal cogenerator. First, to prove it is a cogenerator: The surjective maps $X \to \{0,1\}$ correspond to the non-empty proper subsets of $X$. If $a,b \in X$ are elements that have the same image under each surjective map $X \to \{0,1\}$, it therefore means that they lie in the same non-empty proper subsets of $X$. This implies $a=b$: If $X = \{a\}$, this is trivial. Otherwise, use the subset $\{a\}$.

Now, suppose we have a surjective map $f : X \to Y$ of finite sets such that ${-} \circ f : \Hom(Y, \{0,1\}) \to \Hom(X, \{0,1\})$ is bijective. That means that $f^* : P(Y) \to P(X)$ is bijective on non-empty proper subsets, and it certainly also maps $\varnothing \mapsto \varnothing$ and $Y \mapsto X$. Therefore, since the <a href="/functor/power_set_contravariant">contravariant powerset functor</a> is conservative, that implies $f$ is an isomorphism.

- property: coequalizers
proof: We construct coequalizers as in <a href="/category/FinSet">$\FinSet$</a> (or $\Set$) and observe that the universal property still holds when we restrict to surjective maps.
Expand Down
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions database/data/categories/FiltVect.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ satisfied_properties:

- property: cogenerator
proof: It is straightforward to check that the vector space $K$ equipped with the maximal filtration $F^n(K) \coloneqq K$ is a cogenerator.
check_redundancy: false

- property: extremal cogenerating set
proof: >-
Let $K_n$ denote the vector space $K$ equipped with the filtration such that $F_m(K) = K$ for $m < n$ and $F_m(K) = 0$ for $m \ge n$; and similarly, let $K_\infty$ denote the vector space denoted with the filtration such that $F_m(K) = K$ for each $m$. Then $K_n$ represents the functor mapping $(V, F)$ to $F_n(V)^\perp$, i.e. the space of functionals on $V$ whose kernels contain $F_n(V)$. Also, $K_\infty$ represents the functor sending $(V, F)$ to the dual $V^*$; and the canonical epimorphism $K_\infty \twoheadrightarrow K_n$ corresponds under the Yoneda embedding to the natural inclusion $F_n(V)^\perp \hookrightarrow V$. We claim that $\{ K_n : n \in \IZ \} \cup \{ K_\infty \}$ is an extremal cogenerating set of $\FiltVect_K$.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

denote the vector space denoted (Typo)

$F_n(V)^\perp \hookrightarrow V$ (Typo, it should be the dual space)


First, the set includes $K_\infty$, which we have already seen above is a cogenerator of $\FiltVect_K$. Now, suppose we have a morphism $f : (V, F) \to (W, F')$ such that ${-} \circ f : \Hom((W, F'), K_\infty) \to \Hom((V, F), K_\infty)$ is a bijection. This implies that $f^* : W^* \to V^*$ is an isomorphism of the dual vector spaces. But since $K$ is a cogenerator of $\Vect_K$ and $\Vect_K$ is balanced, in fact $K$ is an extremal cogenerator of $\Vect_K$; so from $f^*$ being an isomorphism, we conclude $f : V \to W$ is an isomorphism of vector spaces.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use display math for ${-} \circ f : \Hom((W, F'), K_\infty) \to \Hom((V, F), K_\infty)$

  1. this avoids the broken formula (cf. Fix word breaks in katex formulas #135, my bad this is not fixed yet)
  2. it gives the text more space to breathe
  3. it is easier to read

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

`But since $K$ is a cogenerator of $\Vect_K$ and $\Vect_K$ is balanced, in fact $K$ is an extremal cogenerator of $\Vect_K$; so from $f^*$ being an isomorphism, we conclude $f : V \to W$ is an isomorphism of vector spaces.``

Let's not repeat linear algebra here. Just use that the dual vector space is conservative.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(In fact I wanted to link to the functor page but then realized it currently doesn't exist...)


It remains to show that if $f$ also induces a bijection ${-} \circ f : \Hom((W, F'), K_n) \to \Hom(V, F), K_n)$ for each $n$, then $f$ induces an isomorphism of the filtrations. For this step, we may assume without loss of generality that $f = \id_V : V \to V$. By the observations above, this then reduces to showing that if $S_1^\perp = S_2^\perp$ where $S_1 \coloneqq F_n(V), S_2 \coloneqq F_n'(V)$ are subspaces of $V$ such that $S_1^\perp = S_2^\perp$, then $S_1 = S_2$. However, if we had $x \in S_1 \setminus S_2$, then starting with a basis of $S_2$, adjoining $x$, and then extending to a basis of $V$, we see that there is a functional $\varphi \in V^*$ such that $\varphi |_{S_2} = 0$ and $\varphi(x) = 1$. But then $\varphi \in S_2^* \setminus S_1^*$, giving a contradiction. This shows $S_1 \subseteq S_2$; and similarly $S_2 \subseteq S_1$.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use display math for ${-} \circ f : \Hom((W, F'), K_n) \to \Hom(V, F), K_n)$

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

However, if we had $x \in S_1 \setminus S_2$, then starting with a basis of $S_2$, adjoining $x$, and then extending to a basis of $V$, we see that there is a functional $\varphi \in V^*$ such that $\varphi |_{S_2} = 0$ and $\varphi(x) = 1$. But then $\varphi \in S_2^* \setminus S_1^*$, giving a contradiction. This shows $S_1 \subseteq S_2$; and similarly $S_2 \subseteq S_1$.

Let's not repeat linear algebra here. Let's just write "it is well-known from linear algebra that a subspace is determined by its orthogonal complement in the dual vector space" (or something like that).


- property: finitely accessible
proof: >-
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions database/data/categories/FinOrd.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: semi-strongly connected
proof: Every non-empty totally ordered set is weakly terminal (by using constant maps).

- property: generator
proof: The one-point finite ordered set is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor $\FinOrd \to \Set$.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The ordered set $\{0 < 1\}$ is an extremal generator, even for <a href="/category/PreOrd">$\PreOrd$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: cogenerator
proof: The ordered set $\{0 < 1\}$ is a cogenerator, even for <a href="/category/Pos">$\Pos$</a>.
- property: extremal cogenerator
proof: The ordered set $\{0 < 1\}$ is an extremal cogenerator, even for <a href="/category/Pos">$\Pos$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: equalizers
proof: Take the equalizer in $\FinSet$ and restrict the order.
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions database/data/categories/FinSet.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: essentially countable
proof: Every finite set is isomorphic to some $\{1,\dotsc,n\}$ for some $n \in \IN$.

- property: generator
proof: The one-point set is a generator since it represents the forgetful functor $\FinSet \to \Set$.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The one-point set is an extremal generator even in <a href="/category/Set">$\Set$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: cogenerator
proof: The two-element set is a cogenerator.
- property: extremal cogenerator
proof: The two-element set is an extremal cogenerator even in <a href="/category/Set">$\Set$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: semi-strongly connected
proof: Every non-empty finite set is weakly terminal (by using constant maps).
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/FinVect_c.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: essentially countable
proof: Every object is isomorphic to $K^n$ for some $n \in \IN$, and $\Hom(K^n,K^m) \cong M_{m \times n}(K)$ is a countable set.

- property: generator
proof: The forgetful functor $\FinVect_K \to \Set$ is faithful and represented by $K$. Hence, $K$ is a generator.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The one-dimensional vector space $K$ is an extremal generator even in <a href="/category/Vect">$\Vect_K$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: split abelian
proof: This follows directly from the corresponding fact for <a href="/category/Vect">$\Vect_K$</a>.
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/FinVect_f.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: locally finite
proof: Each hom-set $\Hom(K^n,K^m) \cong M_{m \times n}(K)$ is finite by assumption.

- property: generator
proof: The forgetful functor $\FinVect_K \to \Set$ is faithful and represented by $K$. Hence, $K$ is a generator.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The one-dimensional vector space $K$ is an extremal generator even in <a href="/category/Vect">$\Vect_K$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: split abelian
proof: This follows directly from the corresponding fact for <a href="/category/Vect">$\Vect_K$</a>.
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions database/data/categories/FinVect_u.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ satisfied_properties:
- property: essentially small
proof: Every object is isomorphic to $K^n$ for some $n \in \IN$, and $\Hom(K^n,K^m) \cong M_{m \times n}(K)$ is a set.

- property: generator
proof: The forgetful functor $\FinVect_K \to \Set$ is faithful and represented by $K$. Hence, $K$ is a generator.
- property: extremal generator
proof: The one-dimensional vector space $K$ is an extremal generator even in <a href="/category/Vect">$\Vect_K$</a>. Now apply Lemma 10 <a href="/content/subcategories">here</a>.

- property: split abelian
proof: This follows directly from the corresponding fact for <a href="/category/Vect">$\Vect_K$</a>.
Expand Down
Loading