Skip to content

docs: add internal service reconciliation to OBS.11a recovery examples#24

Open
detail-app[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
detail/fix-docs/docs-add-internal-service-reconciliation-to-obs-11-2ccb2f
Open

docs: add internal service reconciliation to OBS.11a recovery examples#24
detail-app[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
detail/fix-docs/docs-add-internal-service-reconciliation-to-obs-11-2ccb2f

Conversation

@detail-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@detail-app detail-app Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

The OBS.11a invariant only mentioned "claimed outbox residue" as an example
of an explicit recovery diagnostic that can synthesize terminal failure.
This was incomplete after commit ed8554e added new behavior where stale
internal service rows can be reconciled as failed via
superseded_internal_service_record or internal_service_runtime_missing_after_stale_window.

An agent reading only OBS.11a might incorrectly conclude that stale internal
service reconciliation is prohibited from synthesizing terminal failure,
since it wouldn't recognize these new diagnostics as valid exceptions.

Introduced by commit ed8554e (@VanL)


Doc Drift PRs can be configured here.

@detail-app detail-app Bot requested a review from VanL June 1, 2026 15:47
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.40%. Comparing base (06d8db5) to head (551f473).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #24      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.37%   80.40%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         160      160              
  Lines       29641    29641              
==========================================
+ Hits        23824    23833       +9     
+ Misses       5817     5808       -9     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.40% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 5 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 06d8db5...551f473. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants