Skip to content

Use explicit 3.0 version in logo#297

Open
camillobruni wants to merge 2 commits intoWebKit:JetStream3.0from
camillobruni:2026-03-25_update_logo
Open

Use explicit 3.0 version in logo#297
camillobruni wants to merge 2 commits intoWebKit:JetStream3.0from
camillobruni:2026-03-25_update_logo

Conversation

@camillobruni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@camillobruni camillobruni commented Mar 25, 2026

This makes it easier to spot minor fixes in the future.

  • Add resources/JetStreamLogo.src.svg as editable svg
  • Exported new logo to resources/JetStream30Logo.svg

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Mar 25, 2026

Deploy Preview for webkit-jetstream-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a558be5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/webkit-jetstream-preview/deploys/69c3fa353a72a400085aaeed
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-297--webkit-jetstream-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@danleh danleh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with nit. Lets also update the main branch afterwards (this PR goes to the 3.0 branch directly)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tiny typography nit: Could you very slightly reduce the letter spacing around the . in 3.0?

@kmiller68
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I don't have super strong feelings about this but one downside is that incremental updates require touching up the logo. I kinda prefer the paragraph at the top so we can quickly roll out the number.

@camillobruni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It would be in sync with speedometer where we did the same change (though the "logo" is just text):

It would just eliminate an easy source of error if we ever do an incremental dot-release.

@kmiller68
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It would just eliminate an easy source of error if we ever do an incremental dot-release.

What easy source of error are you thinking? That we copy the wrong branch?

I guess I'd prefer to make this change in 3.1 (if needed).

@camillobruni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Mostly about accidentally using the wrong minor version without noticing since the log doesn't feature the number immediately. It's a bit less of an issue with jetstream since it does mention the minor version in the text.

In the past these two were pretty easy to confuse (since it's only in the tab title).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants