Point to the WCAG 2.2 definition of image of text#2433
Merged
daniel-montalvo merged 1 commit intoJul 24, 2026
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for act-rules ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
daniel-montalvo
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2026
Collaborator
|
@WilcoFiers @dan-tripp-siteimprove I think this is editorial and can be merged with just two approvals. |
daniel-montalvo
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2026
daniel-montalvo
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving, this clarifies the meaning of the paragraph.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current sentence essentially points to SC 2.5.3 Label in Name twice: in /TR and in Understanding.
That might not be intentional for "image of text". I'm suggesting pointing to the "image of text" glossary entry in WCAG 2.2, but it would be important to double-check with authors if this was indeed the intent.
This was raised as part of the review of w3c/wcag-act-rules#431.
Need for Call for Review: Unclear to me.
<< choose one of the following and remove the rest >>
<< check Process Document on Call for Review >>
This can be merged with 1 approval << choose reason: editorial changes to website/test code, adding new contributor, other (explain). >>
This will not require a Call for Review << choose reason(s): editorial changes (including to the applicability, expectation or examples section), changes to assumptions, background, accessibility support, change to website/test code (not rule), other (explain). >>
This will require a 1 week Call for Review << small changes affecting a small number of examples, if in doubt do not use this. >>
This will require a 2 weeks Call for Review << new rule, or substantial changes affecting a large number of examples, if in doubt, use this. >>
Pull Request Etiquette
When creating PR:
developbranch (left side).After creating PR:
Rule,DefinitionorChore.[ ] If your PR is for a new rule with an Accessibility Support note, or for updating the Accessibility Support note of an existing section, make sure to open a corresponding Accessibility Support issue.When merging a PR:
How to Review And Approve