Enforce co-partitioning for sort merge and symmetric hash joins#23480
Open
gene-bordegaray wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
core
gene-bordegaray
commented
Jul 11, 2026
| .map(|exec| Arc::new(exec) as Arc<dyn ExecutionPlan>) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn hash_partitioned_exec( |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
using hash to prove that co-partitioning dows work fro an accepted partitioning type
Contributor
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Distribution::KeyPartitionedrequirements before general Range satisfaction #23451Rationale for this change
Partitioned sort merge and symmetric hash joins process matching child partition indexes together. Independent
KeyPartitionedrequirements do not express that cross-child invariant.What changes are included in this PR?
SortMergeJoinExecand partitionedSymmetricHashJoinExecAre these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
None.