Update PR template to mention coding assistant attribution

[mbien]

minimal LLM guidelines for contributors

• LLM/coding assistant attribution in commits and PR description via Assisted-by tag
• updated paperwork check

see discussion on dev list: https://lists.apache.org/thread/qhr3mfxg5wsv89d80nxzdd63ldjth07p

ASF guidelines: https://apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html
inspired by: https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html#attribution

---

^Add meaningful description above

Click to collapse/expand PR instructions

By opening a pull request you confirm that, unless explicitly stated otherwise, the changes -

• are all your own work, and you have the right to contribute them.
• are contributed solely under the terms and conditions of the Apache License 2.0 (see section 5 of the license for more information).

LLMs, Commit messages and PR description:

• Please make sure (eg. git log) that all commits have a valid name and email address for you in the Author field.
• LLM assisted commits should be attributed with an Assisted-by: MODEL_NAME MODEL_VERSION line appended to the commit message.
  • Please mention coding assistance in the PR description too (eg. by adding the same Assisted-by line from above)
  • Please describe the changes in your own words - we'd like to know you understand the changes being made!

If you're a first time contributor, see the Contributing guidelines for more information.

If you're a committer, please label the PR before pressing "Create pull request" so that the right test jobs can run.

PR approval and merge checklist:

1. Was this PR correctly labeled, did the right tests run? When did they run?
2. Is this PR squashed?
3. Are author name / email address correct? Are co-authors correctly listed? Do the commit messages need updates?
4. Does the PR title and description still fit after the Nth iteration? Is the description sufficient to appear in the release notes?

If this PR targets the delivery branch: don't merge. (full wiki article)

[neilcsmith-net]

Looks good, thanks! Hadn't taken in you planned to change the checker too, but makes sense.

[ebarboni]

LGTM too

[mbien]

there is also the problem that CLI created PRs completely ignore the template and won't see any of this. But lets start somewhere. One step at a time.

[matthiasblaesing]

Makes sense to me. Thank you!

[mbien]

planning to merge this on monday, after that we can get some pending PRs in using the tags